Video: European Missile System Component Of First Strike Strategy
RT
September 16, 2011
AMD ‘un-resets’ Washington’s relations with Moscow
====
Or second video screen at:
http://rt.com/news/amd-moscow-race-russia-683/
====
Ship-based Standard Missile-3 launch (Missile Defense Agency)
The recent spike in activity has highlighted Washington’s commitment not only to press ahead with the European missile defense shield project, but also to extend and reinforce it, despite indicating two years ago that it wanted to abandon the scheme. That is the view of Rick Rozoff, an international affairs expert from the “Stop NATO” movement.
Rozoff adds that American claims of a threat from North Korea or Iran are purely fictitious.
“What we’re talking about is a potential adjunct to a first-strike system,” the expert says. “This means that in the event the US and its NATO allies would launch what they would describe as a ‘pre-emptive’ strike – but in reality a first strike – against a nation like Russia, an integrated missile defense system will be in place to ensure that any missiles surviving this ‘pre-emptive’ attack would be knocked out by kinetic interceptor missiles,” he explains.
“It is not defensive,” Rick Rozoff concludes, meaning that from the geographical standpoint, the positioning of the rockets makes no sense as they will not effectively intercept threats from either Pyongyang or Tehran.
For peace, against war: literary selections 
In my opinion, UN has to be disbanded, so that Planetary Consciousness can establish JUST
Collective Body to protect equally Planet EARTH with ALL living creations from the ACTIONS due to lack of REASON of a FEW Human(oid) REJECTS.
To start with, Ban: Ban Ki Moon!
LikeLike
Great stuff, Rick! There is really no way for Washington to explain away this AMD system as if it is purely to prevent an attack from Iran/NK, even if they presented a threat (which they don’t).
Let’s not even mention the fact that the system doesn’t even work properly!
What a joke!
LikeLike