Top Marine In Japan: U.S. Could Retake Diaoyus/Senkakus From China
Stars and Stripes
April 11, 2014
Top Marine in Japan: If tasked, we could retake the Senkakus from China
By Jon Harper
WASHINGTON: If the Chinese invaded the Senkaku Islands, U.S. Marines in the Pacific could recapture them, the commander of Marines in Japan said Friday.
The Senkakus have been administered by Japan for decades, but China now claims sovereignty over them. Amid other heated territorial disputes with its neighbors, China has deployed naval assets near the Senkakus in recent months.
During his recent trip to Asia, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel reiterated the U.S. position that the Senkakus fall under the scope of the U.S. defense treaty with Japan, and the U.S. would be obliged to come to the aid of its Japanese ally if the islands were attacked by a foreign power.
Hagel’s comments came after Adm. Samuel Locklear III, the commander of all U.S. forces in the Pacific, told lawmakers last month that the Navy and Marines don’t have enough transportation assets in the region to carry out amphibious operations in a contested environment.
“If we were directed to take the Senkakus, could we? Yes. [But] to tell you how it would take place or would it take place or any of that would be pure speculation,” Lt. Gen. John Wissler, the commander of the III Marine Expeditionary Force based in Japan, said at a breakfast with defense reporters in Washington.
“They’re not real big,” he said. “I think sometimes people get this idea that the Senkakus look like the island of Okinawa or, you know, any of the other major islands. It’s a very, very small collection of small islands.”
Wissler suggested that U.S. naval and air assets could take out the Chinese forces on their own, and a forcible entry probably wouldn’t be required.
“You wouldn’t maybe even necessarily have to put somebody on that island until you had eliminated the threat, so to speak. And that’s where that whole integration of our full capabilities as a Navy-Marine Corps team would be of value,” he said.
…
For peace, against war: literary selections 
If Senkaku/Diaoyu is a very very small collection of Islands, then the question is begged what the US and Japan wants to “take” it for if not a forward base for further military plans.
This hypothesis could be proven wrong when Senkaku/Diaoyu is declared a joint China Japan national park to demonstrate the desire for peace. Somewhat like the DMZ is a people’s park on Korea, maybe this park will be for families or sport fishermen.
The war in the Pacific was already fought with great loss of life, US atomic bombing and mass destruction of Japan. Stop this Asian pivot, let the people of Asia form their own agreements and give peace a chance. Be peace leaders.
LikeLike
The U.S really overshoot their ability on everything, the fact is they are a diminishing power, so how they come to the conclusion abouth taking this and taking that is quite laughable. All they have left is rhetoric at best.
LikeLike
Notice the reference to Okinawa, which has been a bone of contention for decades as the USA ruins the land belonging to the people and refuses any redress or to leave. Now the USA can pretend to help Japan after its actions “to save our boys” at the end of WW2 and its efforts to get rid of Japan’s “no more war” constitution, just to counter China’s claims, legitimated after WW2.
LikeLike