Home > Uncategorized > Partners Across the Asia-Pacific: NATO Reinforces Pentagon’s Shift to East

Partners Across the Asia-Pacific: NATO Reinforces Pentagon’s Shift to East

Stop NATO
September 25, 2012

Partners Across the Asia-Pacific: NATO Reinforces Pentagon’s Shift to East
Rick Rozoff

On September 24 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization granted Iraq the second Individual Partnership and Cooperation Programme under the auspices of the bloc’s latest military collaboration and integration framework, partners across the globe.

The latter program (for which the substantives are occasionally capitalized), NATO’s latest, incorporates to date eight nations in the broader Asia-Pacific region (including West Asia, the Middle East) that have supplied troops for the U.S.-led military organization’s war in Afghanistan under International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) command or are subsumed under NATO consultative arrangements and training programs like the Afghanistan-Pakistan-ISAF Tripartite Commission, the NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan and the NATO Training Mission – Iraq.

The partners across the globe currently are Afghanistan, Australia, Iraq, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, Pakistan and South Korea. Among the 50 nations providing NATO with troop contingents for the war in South Asia are additional Asia-Pacific states not covered by other international NATO partnership formats like the Partnership for Peace (22 nations in Europe, the South Caucasus and Central Asia), the Mediterranean Dialogue (seven nations in North Africa and the Middle East, with Libya to be the eighth) and the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, which targets the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates).

Those states – Malaysia, Singapore and Tonga – are likely the next candidates for the new global partnership, as are Latin American troop contributors like El Salvador (present) and Colombia (announced). The inclusion of the last will mark the expansion of NATO, through memberships and partnerships, to all six inhabited continents.

In the past two years there has been discussion about NATO establishing a collective partnership arrangement, which could include individual partnerships as well, with the ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which are, in addition to Malaysia and Singapore, mentioned above, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand.

During the NATO summit in Chicago this May, Secretary General Rasmussen met with what were identified as 13 partners across the globe.

Regarding the new partnership agreement with Iraq, the NATO website reports that it follows and builds upon the eight-year NATO Training Mission-Iraq, which was employed to train thousands of Iraq officers, soldiers and oil police, and “inaugurates a full-fledged partnership.”

The Alliance further stated, “The signing of the partnership accord marks the formal accession of Iraq to NATO’s ‘partnerships family,’” which will create the basis for the Western alliance “assisting Iraq as it builds a modern security sector which can cooperate with international partners.”

That is, the NATO-trained Iraq armed forces are being recruited into the Western military axis’ international nexus.

Four days earlier NATO signed an Individual Partnership and Cooperation Programme with South Korea in Brussels which, the NATO press release on the occasion stated, “follows seven years of progressive engagement from a dialogue that was initiated in 2005.”

In June NATO Secretary General Rasmussen hosted prime minister of New Zealand John Key at NATO headquarters in Brussels, where the two signed the same agreement.

The first Individual Partnership and Cooperation Programme was signed with Mongolia this March. (Though an agreement with the same title was signed with Switzerland in the same month.) That country borders China and Russia; in fact, of the eight current partners across the globe, three – Mongolia, Pakistan and Afghanistan – share borders with China and two others, Japan and South Korea, are its near neighbors.

In conjunction with the U.S., NATO is striving to assemble the remnants of defunct or dormant Cold War-era military blocs in the Asia-Pacific region, all modeled after NATO itself – the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO), the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and the Security Treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the United States of America (ANZUS) – to replicate in the East against China what NATO expansion has accomplished in Europe over the past 13 years in relation to Russia: its exclusion, isolation and encirclement by military bases, naval deployments and interceptor missile installations.

The U.S. has recruited Japan, South Korea and Australia into its global sea- and land-based missile shield grid, with a recent report indicating the Pentagon plans to add the Philippines to the list with the deployment there of an Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance mobile system of the sort already stationed in Japan, Israel and Turkey.

Following Mongolia, New Zealand, South Korea and Iraq, NATO intends to sign Individual Partnership and Cooperation Programme accords with its remaining partners across the globe: Afghanistan, Australia, Japan and Pakistan.

Like South Korea with its neighbor to the north, Japan is embroiled in a showdown with China, and Afghanistan and Pakistan are involved in armed conflicts, with NATO waging a nearly 11-year war in Afghanistan and periodic incursions and attacks across the border in Pakistan.

The formal consolidation of military partnerships with the above nations will provide NATO the rationale for direct participation in hostilities in the Asia-Pacific region as a manifestation of the bloc’s repeated claims to being a global military force.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. September 26, 2012 at 10:24 pm

    Hi Ross,

    Rasmussen did not travel to New Zealand. John Key did a tour in Europe and it was announced that he would meet with Rasmussen in Brussel. New Zealand was not aware it had signed a NATO partnership until it was a done deal in secret during John Key’s Europe tour in June of this year.

    Regards

    Evelien

    Here is my blogpost on it before it came out he signed the partnership: http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/john-key-goes-to-europe/

    • richardrozoff
      September 26, 2012 at 10:45 pm

      You’re right. I had trusted to memory and was in error.
      The mistake is all the worse as I had written correctly about the venue at the time:

      NATO: From the North Atlantic to the South Pacific

      • September 26, 2012 at 11:26 pm

        No problem, I watch John Key and his Wall street connected antiks everyday and have done so for the last 5 years.

        If you need any information about NZ’s politics and how we are being roped right back into the evil empire let me know. I’m happy to find out and get this info to the wider public.

        Yesterday it was announced the NZ SAS needs a bigger “training” facility to be built by a foreign “designer”. I’m reading first US bases in 2015 built by Haliburton et all.

        http://aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com/2012/09/26/a-new-sas-training-facility-can-you-say-haliburton-mercenaries-and-the-first-us-bases-in-2015-south-of-auckland/

      • richardrozoff
        September 27, 2012 at 1:19 am

        Thanks for the link.
        New Zealand’s special forces serving under NATO command in Afghanistan is proof enough, even before Hillary Clinton’s visit to the country two years ago which seemed to have clinched the deal.

  2. September 27, 2012 at 10:02 pm

    Wondered if you came across this deployment to Tonga, coming after the PACRIM exercise? Here’s some screenshots of the article

    • richardrozoff
      September 27, 2012 at 11:36 pm

      Thank you for the information, which is new to me.
      You’ll recall that British troops were sent to Tonga two years ago to train at least 300 local soldiers for deployment to Afghanistan to serve under NATO’s International Security Assistance Force. I believe Tonga is the penultimate nation (of 50) to do so, El Salvador being the last – unless Colombian troops are there now.

      • September 28, 2012 at 4:39 am

        Tonga is in an dilemma, since it is a recipient of China aid and using their forces in NATO operations. Here’s another interesting article by Wayne Madsen : “Hillary Clinton’s plan For PATO to replace NATO”.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 506 other followers

%d bloggers like this: