Archive

Archive for September, 2011

Updates on Libyan war/Stop NATO news: September 30, 2011

September 30, 2011 4 comments

====

Libya: Over 9,000 NATO Combat Flights, 24,346 Sorties

With Libya Still Smouldering, BRICS Opposes NATO States On Military Operations Against Syria

Rasmussen On Chicago Summit: Libya To Join Global NATO Network

NATO Missile System Interim Capability By May Summit: Chief

Exploiting R2P To Bomb Nations, Overthrow Regimes Unacceptable: Russian Foreign Ministry

Russian Envoy Accuses NATO Of Gross Violation Of UNSC Kosovo Resolution

NATO: Afghan Civilian Deaths Caused By Air Strikes Up 19 Percent

Afghan War: NATO 2011 Death Toll Continues To Rise

Pakistani Parties Show Rare Unity In Opposition To U.S. Threats

Video/Song: “Humanitarian NATO”

Obama, Uzbek President Discuss Afghan War Supply Routes

Clinton: Uzbekistan Key Supply Hub For Afghan War

Czech Republic: 225,000 Attend 18-Nation “NATO Days”

Estonia Pursues “Total Defense” Against Russia

Adjutant General Of Illinois Receives Polish Army Medal

Germany Hosts Warplanes For NATO Response Force 2012 Exercise

NATO, Oil/Gas: GUAM Ministerial Held During Eastern Partnership Summit

NATO Trains Azerbaijan’s Officer Corps

====

Libya: Over 9,000 NATO Combat Flights, 24,346 Sorties

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_09/20110930_110930-oup-update.pdf

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 30, 2011

NATO and Libya
Allied Joint Force Command NAPLES, SHAPE, NATO HQ

Over the past 24 hours, NATO has conducted the following activities associated with Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR:

Air Operations

Since the beginning of the NATO operation (31 March 2011, 06.00GMT) a total of 24,346 sorties, including 9,082 strike sorties, have been conducted.

Sorties conducted 29 SEPTEMBER: 110

Strike sorties conducted 29 SEPTEMBER: 42

====

With Libya Still Smouldering: BRICS Oppose NATO States On Military Operations Against Syria

http://rt.com/politics/russia-un-security-council-libya-resolutions-769/

RT
September 30, 2011

With Libya still smoldering, Russia rejects UN resolution on Syria
Robert Bridge

-European member states of the Security Council, with implicit support from the United States, were hoping to “fast-track” this latest resolution, which calls for the immediate imposition of a weapons embargo and other sanctions against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.
Russia, Brazil, China, India and South Africa, however, which together make up the so-called BRICS economic bloc, spoke out against the document, expressing concerns that the Western countries may use this resolution to carry out another military operation.

Russia, wary of more military intervention, has rejected the latest version of a UN Security Council draft resolution on Syria, where the government of President Bashar al-Assad is cracking down on violent anti-government protests.

The four European member states of the UN Security Council, Britain, France, Germany and Portugal, were hoping to put the draft resolution to a vote on Friday, but Russia rejected the document.

During consultations held in the UN on Thursday, Russia’s UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin said he was “disappointed” with the provisions of the draft resolution, in which he says the proposals made by Russia were not taken into account.

“I’m not optimistic,” Churkin said before the meeting. “And we are not the only ones in this position.”

China has also threatened to use its veto power, as a permanent member of the council, against any UN resolution against Syria that leaves room for “punitive measures.”

There is also disagreement over whether violence by protesters should be given the same importance as that by the government.

India’s UN envoy Hardeep Singh Puri said there must include a reference to violence by “extremist elements” in any resolution.

Initially, the European member states of the Security Council, with implicit support from the United States, were hoping to “fast-track” this latest resolution, which calls for the immediate imposition of a weapons embargo and other sanctions against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Russia, Brazil, China, India and South Africa, however, which together make up the so-called BRICS economic bloc, spoke out against the document, expressing concerns that the Western countries may use this resolution to carry out another military operation.

Indeed, with Libya still smoldering from its ongoing civil war, which saw forces loyal to ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi battling anti-government forces, who received heavy aerial support courtesy of NATO fighter jets and cruise missiles, Russia and others states are taking extra precautions in handling the Syrian crisis.

Churkin said members of the UN Security Council had “a good discussion” and Russia is expecting a new edition of the resolution to be presented soon.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton demanded that Syria “take every possible step” to protect US diplomats after supporters of President Bashar al-Assad tried to attack US ambassador Robert Ford in Damascus.
Amid rising US-Syrian tensions, Damascus earlier accused the United States of inciting “armed militias” into violence against its army, which is trying to contain a six-month anti-government movement.

====

Rasmussen On Chicago Summit: Libya To Join Global NATO Network

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/opinions_78600.htm

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 30, 2011

Towards NATO’s Chicago Summit
Speech by NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen at the European Policy Centre, Brussels

-I would like the summit to reaffirm our commitment to the Euro-Atlantic integration of our partners here on this continent. But also to send a strong signal to countries across the Mediterranean, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. That we continue to share an interest in the stability and security of their region. And I hope that by the time of our Chicago summit, a new, democratic Libya will be among our partners in the region.

…I was particularly happy to accept the European Policy Centre’s invitation to speak to you today. Because it gives me an early chance to set out my vision of the Alliance’s future. And to look ahead with you to the NATO Summit, in Chicago, next May.

As I said NATO is busier than ever…

Although the [Libyan] mission is not yet complete, it has already shown that NATO can make a difference…Operation Unified Protector has shown that…NATO is the indispensable alliance.

We must make sure that it remains the indispensable Alliance. Especially at a time when nothing can be taken for granted.

The backdrop to our NATO summit in Chicago is the global economic crisis. And there is no contradiction between being concerned about the economy and being concerned about security. Because economy and security are interlinked. Huge deficits and growing debt make nations vulnerable. Therefore, sound fiscal policies are also sound security policies. Both require that we get the most out of every euro, pound and dollar that we spend on defence and security.

Security is not an optional extra – even in times of austerity. It’s not a luxury – it’s a vital necessity. Because security problems don’t wait while we come to terms with our economic difficulties. And they certainly don’t solve themselves.

…And the argument for transatlantic commitment is more compelling than ever.

So in Chicago, I am confident that you will see a NATO Alliance demonstrating its strong solidarity even in difficult economic times…

We are an Alliance committed to transatlantic solidarity and cooperation…

In fact, the Libya operation shows the strength and the solidarity of our Alliance even in the middle of an economic crisis…

NATO acted within 6 days – faster than ever before. And we acted successfully. All Allies took part, directly or indirectly, through our common command structure and common funding.

In Libya, European Allies and Canada took the lead. In Afghanistan, the United States has been the leading nation from the start. And in Kosovo, Germany is currently playing the leading role.

These are all demanding operations. NATO’s operational flexibility allows each and every Ally to play to its particular strengths…

It is this operational flexibility that allows the Alliance to carry out several different operations at the same time. And to do so effectively.

In Libya, European Allies and Canada provided most of the assets. But the success of that operation depended on unique and essential capabilities which only the United States could offer. Capabilities such as drones, surveillance and intelligence assets.

Missile defence is a case in point…

That brings me to the final element of my vision for NATO – an Alliance that is even better connected to its partner nations and the rest of the international community.

Libya has been another demonstration of the importance of NATO’s network of partnerships. At the start of the Libya crisis, many said we had an image problem in the Arab world. But our operation proves the contrary…

Our security is best assured through a wide network of partnerships with countries and organisations around the globe…

We aim to deepen political dialogue and practical cooperation with the United Nations. The European Union is another unique and essential partner for NATO. And we will continue to promote the Euro-Atlantic integration of countries in the Western Balkans and to our East.

Finally, building on the success of our Libya operation, the Alliance should also be much better connected with its southern neighbours – across the Mediterranean and into the Middle East and Gulf regions…

That is my vision for NATO. An Alliance that is committed, capable, and connected. And in Chicago next May, we can help transform that vision into reality.

[M]issile defence. Poland, Romania and Turkey have already agreed to host key elements of this system. And my goal for Chicago is that we declare an interim operational capability for NATO’s territorial missile defence…

Finally – partnerships. I would like the summit to reaffirm our commitment to the Euro-Atlantic integration of our partners here on this continent. But also to send a strong signal to countries across the Mediterranean, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. That we continue to share an interest in the stability and security of their region. And I hope that by the time of our Chicago summit, a new, democratic Libya will be among our partners in the region.

====

NATO Missile System Interim Capability By May Summit: Chief

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-09/30/c_131170077.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 30, 2011

NATO missile defense to get interim capability by next May

BRUSSELS: NATO leaders will announce an interim operational capability for the military alliance’s missile defense system in Europe at the Chicago summit in May, 2012, the head of NATO said on Friday.

“Poland, Romania and Turkey have already agreed to host key elements of this system. And my goal for Chicago is that we declare an interim operational capability for NATO’s territorial missile defense. We will then be able to receive early warning of missile launches directed against us,” Anders Fogh Rasmussen said during a think tank breakfast meeting.

NATO’s vision on missile defense cooperation has been rejected by Russia that warned NATO’s moves would undermine its nuclear deterrent, upset the balance of power and trigger a new arms race in Europe.

====

Exploiting R2P To Bomb Nations, Overthrow Regimes Unacceptable: Russian Foreign Ministry

http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?pg=6&id=276995

Interfax
September 30, 2011

Interference in internal affairs must not be covered by concept of protecting civilians – Lukashevich

MOSCOW: Attempts to justify foreign interference in internal affairs by compliance with the concept of the responsibility to protect civilians are unacceptable, said Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich.

“We cannot side-step the polemics [at the 66th session of the UN general Assembly] on the concept of responsibility for the protection [of civilians], which some speakers cited while justifying the use of force in internal conflicts, including in Libya,” he said at a press briefing in Moscow on Friday.

“Russia is convinced that using this concept as a cover for interference in internal affairs and for regime change in the UN member-states is unacceptable,” he said.

====

Russian Envoy Accuses NATO Of Gross Violation Of UNSC Kosovo Resolution

http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?pg=2&id=277104

Interfax
September 30, 2011

Rogozin accuses NATO of gross violation of UNSC resolution on Kosovo

MOSCOW: In another conflict in Kosovo, NATO has openly sided with Pristina and acted in breach of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution, said Russia’s Ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin.

“In this situation, NATO has unequivocally sided with Pristina,” he said in an interview with the Rossiya 24 television channel on Friday.

During the conflict, soldiers from the NATO Force for Kosovo used firearms against the Serbs, he said.

“Essentially, it was shooting against a peaceful civilian demonstration. This is absolutely against all of the norms written down in the UN Security Council Resolution No. 1244,” the ambassador said.

====

NATO: Afghan Civilian Deaths Caused By Air Strikes Up 19 Percent

http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2011/09/29/civilian-deaths-caused-airstrikes-isaf

Pajhwok Afghan News
September 29, 2011

Civilian deaths caused by airstrikes up: ISAF

KABU: Civilian deaths caused by NATO-led airstrikes increased from 57 to 67, or by 18 percent, over the past eight months, compared to the same period in 2010, a spokesman for the International Security Assistance Force said on Thursday.

A day earlier, the United Nations said that Afghanistan had emerged as more insecure during the current year, with a sharp spike in security incidents and the number of civilian casualties, civilian displacement and complex suicide attacks.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in his report to the Security Council that the number of security incidents during the first eight months of the year was nearly 40 percent higher than in the corresponding period of 2010.

Civilian casualties, at an all-time high for the first half of the year, rose by five percent in the June-August period compared with last year, with militants linked to three quarters of the deaths and injuries, the UN report said.

====

Afghan War: NATO 2011 Death Toll Continues To Rise

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-09/30/c_131168434.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 30, 2011

4 ISAF armymen killed in Afghanistan: news release

KABUL: Three NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) service members were killed in an attack and another died in a non-battle related injury in Afghanistan, according to ISAF press releases issued on Thursday.

“Three International Security Assistance Force service members died following an improvised explosive device (IED) attack in southern Afghanistan yesterday,” an ISAF news release issued on Thursday said.

On Wednesday, another three ISAF soldiers were also killed in an IED attack in eastern Afghanistan, a former news release said.

In a separate Thursday statement, the ISAF said “an International Security Assistance Force service member died as a result of a non-battle related injury in southern Afghanistan today”.

Both Thursday news releases read as usual, “It is ISAF policy to defer casualty identification procedures to the relevant national authorities.”

Afghan Taliban has launched massive IED attacks against ISAF and Afghan national security force in recent years.

The fatalities of NATO-led forces this year, according to iCasualties, have been registered 463 till Thursday, out of which 397 killed in IED attacks, 342 of which from the United States and 34 from the United Kingdom.

Forty nine countries are contributing 130,000-strong forces in Afghanistan with over 90,000 of them American mainly stationed in the east and south, followed by 9,500 from UK mainly based in southern Afghanistan.

====

Pakistani Parties Show Rare Unity In Opposition To U.S. Threats

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2011-09/29/c_131168356.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 29, 2011

Pakistani parties show rare unity to U.S. threats
By Tahir Khan

ISLAMABAD: Politically divided and insurgency-hit Pakistan is showing rare unity at a time when top U. S. military leaders are issuing threatening statements of unilateral military action in Pakistan’s tribal region against the armed militant groups…

Pakistani leaders have complained that senior U.S. officials have unleashed verbal attacks on its intelligence agencies that they supported Taliban-linked groups in recent attacks on the U.S. embassy and a military base in Afghanistan.

Pakistan angrily rejected U.S. claims as unfortunate and also dismissed the threats of unilateral action as contrary to the spirit of bilateral cooperation in the war on terror.

…The U.S. routinely uses unmanned aircraft to target the hideouts of suspected militants in the Waziristan region, bordering Afghanistan.

…Pakistani leaders said that the CIA had created the Haqqanis and had been once the U.S. “blue-eyed boys”.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani said this week that several countries have contacts with the Haqqanis and rejected as unfair the U.S. policy of singling out Pakistan. As there is no let-up in the U.S. pressure on Pakistan and its leaders are issuing threats of strikes, Pakistanis have shown unity to meet any challenge. The prime minister has called an All-Parties Conference (APC) to get support from all political and religious parties at the critical juncture of Pakistan’s history.

Nearly 60 political leaders, including the main opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif, will attend the conference. Top military leaders and the ISI chief will brief the leaders and will respond to their questions about what measures have been taken to defend the country.

Tribesmen in Waziristan and other regions have also declared support to the Pakistani government and elders have vowed armed resistance if the United States launched any attack, a tribal elder who attended a meeting in Miranshah, the center of North Waziristan, this week said. Two nationalist groups in southwestern Balochistan province have refused to attend the APC. They cited political differences over the government policies in Balochistan for decision to stay away from the APC but said they would strongly oppose any U.S. military intervention.

It is the third time in three years that the government has called an APC to adopt a united stand to what the majority believes is the aggressive U.S. posture towards its close ally, which has lost nearly 30,000 civilians and about 5,000 security personnel in bomb blasts, suicide attacks and military operations since late 2001.

…Thursday’s APC was convened as Pakistani political and military leaders have realized gravity of the situation.

Pakistanis are annoyed at the U.S. allegations against its military and security organizations, who had been the main target of the militant groups.

FOCUS ON FRIENDS AND REGIONAL COUNTRIES

Pakistan has approached its close friends and regional countries in the wake of continued U.S. threats and sent its intelligence chief to Saudi Arabia to win its support in the current circumstances. Pakistan is happy over the recent supportive statements from time-trusted friend China, and the Iranian Interior Minister Mohammad Najar threw support to Pakistan when he met President Asif Ali Zardari on Wednesday.

Pakistan Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar warned this week that the United States will lose its close ally if it continued allegations against her country and its security agencies.

Pakistani analysts, foreign experts, defense experts and the media are also advising the government to review its foreign policy vis-a-vis the United States and to promote ties with friendly and regional countries. They also ask the government to reject conditional U.S. aid and focus on trade, not aid. The united stand in Pakistan to U.S. threats would send a strong message to the American military that coercive tactics will not work as the whole Pakistani population is in rare unity.

There are no positive signals coming from Washington to ease tensions and the outgoing Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen said in his latest statement on Wednesday that the Americans will now take a tougher line against Pakistan. Senior Republican U.S. senator, Senator Lindsey Graham, has warned that U.S. lawmakers might support military options beyond drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal regions.

He said options available include using U.S. bomber planes within Pakistan. These threatening American statements have forced the government to show unity and win the support of the opposition parties, and a tough and united response is likely at the end of the APC later Thursday.

====

“Humanitarian NATO”
Bob A. Feldman

====

Obama, Uzbek President Discuss Afghan War Supply Routes

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=20119\30\story_30-9-2011_pg7_7

Reuters
September 29, 2011

Obama, Uzbek leader discuss Afghan supply routes

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama and Uzbekistan’s President Islam Karimov discussed the Central Asian country’s role as a supply route for US troops in Afghanistan, a US official said on Thursday, amid growing concern about the stability of Pakistan as a transit point.

The White House said Obama spoke to Karimov late Wednesday to congratulate the former Soviet republic on its 20th anniversary of independence and that they talked about shared interests in a ‘secure and prosperous’ Afghanistan.

Obama’s outreach to Karimov, who has faced US criticism in the past over his human rights record, came as the United States and Pakistan are locked in a diplomatic crisis over US accusations linking Pakistan’s chief intelligence agency to attacks on Americans in Afghanistan. The rising tensions between Washington and Islamabad, at times awkward partners in the fight against militancy, have raised questions about Pakistan’s role as a major US supply route for its forces fighting in Afghanistan. That has sent US officials scrambling to consider expanding alternatives to reduce reliance on Pakistan.

====

Clinton: Uzbekistan Key Supply Hub For Afghan War

http://en.trend.az/regions/casia/uzbekistan/1938648.html

Trend News Agency
September 30, 2011

U.S: Uzbekistan greatly assists U.S. military cargo transportation to Afghanistan

Baku: Uzbekistan greatly assists the U.S. by transporting U.S. military cargo to Afghanistan via the so-called Northern Distribution Network, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Thursday, Itar-TASS reported.

Supplies for the U.S. troops are transported through this network to Afghanistan by transit from the Baltic countries through Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

Tashkent greatly assists the Northern Distribution Network, Clinton said.

“We appreciate our ties with Uzbekistan,” she said. “Certainly, we would like to intensify our relations in all spheres.”

Earlier on Thursday, Clinton held talks with Uzbek Foreign Minister Elyor Ganiev, who was on a visit to Washington.

Clinton said that the U.S. thinks that the continuation of a dialogue with Uzbek officials is significant.

====

Czech Republic: 225,000 Attend 18-Nation “NATO Days”

http://praguemonitor.com/2011/09/26/record-225000-people-saw-nato-days-%C4%8Dr

Czech News Agency
September 26, 2011

Record 225,000 people saw NATO Days in ČR

-This year’s NATO Days were participated in by 18 countries. Israel, Norway, Sweden and Turkey took part for the first time.

Mosnov, North Moravia: A record number of 225,000 people attended the two-day NATO Days and Czech Military Air Force Days held at Leos Janacek airport in Mosnov, on Saturday and Sunday, event spokesman Jaromir Krisica told CTK Sunday.

He said 185,000 people came to the event last year.

NATO Days are the biggest aviation-military-security event in Central Europe, according to the organisers.

Visitors could see military aircraft, including an AWACS plane and the U.S. B-52 strategic bomber, as well as other military and rescue equipment.

The performances by two aerobatics groups, the four-member Baltic Bees and the eight-member Turkish Stars, were among the biggest attractions.

“The visitors could see at the airport 246 pieces of equipment, including almost 90 planes,” said Zbynek Pavlicek, head of the Jagello 2000 association, the event’s chief organiser.

The Saturday programme included the ceremonial admission of the Czech Republic to the AWACS early warning system.

This year’s NATO Days were participated in by 18 countries. Israel, Norway, Sweden and Turkey took part for the first time.

====

Estonia Pursues “Total Defense” Against Russia

http://news.err.ee/politics/9467f47e-46c1-46fe-b4d6-a7afe1e00fbf

Estonian Public Broadcasting
September 29, 2011

Laar Ponders How to Make Most of Defense Capability
Kristopher Rikken

-With an increase in Russian forces along the western borders and a reported dropoff in military capability in Estonia’s southern neighbors, military topics have been more prominent recently. Head of Laar’s advisory board, retired Lt. Col. Leo Kunnas minced no words, saying that the priority for the next ten years is to increase combat capability in light of developments in Russia. He said the three gaps that must be closed are coastal defense, medium range air defense, and armored maneuvering capability.

Defence Minister Mart Laar has emphasized the need for Scandinavian-style total defense, in which all of society participates in countering security threats.

His remarks came at the opening of the ABCD defense policy conference in Tallinn on September 29.

The Nordic model is not incompatible with NATO, which, as Laar also said in an opinion piece in Postimees on September 27, will remain one of the two pillars of defense, the other being the reserves based on general compulsory military service.

At the conference, Laar said the Nordics “realized long ago” that military forces alone were not enough but that the entire civilian sector should participate in national defense.

…”Instead we need 21st century total defense – a truly broad-based approach to security, where government agencies, private sector and civic society engage in cooperation for national defense.”

Held since 2006, the Annual Baltic Conference on Defence is organized by the Defense Ministry and the Estonian think tank International Center for Defense Studies.

Total defense has been a hallmark of Estonian defense policy. A more specific ten-year strategy is currently being prepared at the Defense Ministry, and despite Laar’s focus on intangible and asymmetric threats at the conference, there is a good deal of thinking going on about concrete military scenarios. 

With an increase in Russian forces along the western borders and a reported dropoff in military capability in Estonia’s southern neighbors, military topics have been more prominent recently. Head of Laar’s advisory board, retired Lt. Col. Leo Kunnas minced no words, saying that the priority for the next ten years is to increase combat capability in light of developments in Russia. He said the three gaps that must be closed are coastal defense, medium range air defense, and armored maneuvering capability.

Defense spending has risen to a promised 2 percent in next year’s budget, but with the recession having slightly shrunk the economy, Laar has voiced concern about how to make that money go further.

====

Adjutant General Of Illinois Receives Polish Army Medal

http://www.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=1&RecNum=9763

Illinois Government News Service
September 29, 2011

Illinois’ Top Military Officer Receives Prestigious Polish Army Medal
Illinois Adjutant General William Enyart Honored With Polish Army’s Highest Award to a Foreign Officer

-Aside from military-to-military and military-to-civilian exchanges and co-training, the Illinois National Guard also co-deploys troops with Polish forces, first to Iraq and now to Afghanistan.

WARSAW, Poland: Illinois Governor Pat Quinn’s top military officer, Maj. Gen. William L. Enyart, the Adjutant General of Illinois, received the Polish Army Medal during an official visit to Poland last week. U.S. Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs Thomas Lamont accompanied Enyart to the ceremony, which included a military parade, a performance by a Polish Army band, and a “dress and review” march in which 100 Polish soldiers saluted and honored the officer.

In receiving the Gold grade of the medal, Enyart joins a short list of American generals to receive the award including former Army Chief of Staff Gen. (ret.) George W. Casey, former Central Command Commander and current CIA Director Army Gen. (ret.) David Petraeus, African Command Commander Army Gen. Carter Ham, and Marine Gen. John R. Allen, the Commander of International Security Assistance Force- Afghanistan and United States Forces – Afghanistan.

The medal was signed by Polish Minister of National Defense Obrony Narodowej and was approved by the Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski.

Enyart commands the 13,000-member Illinois National Guard, which has maintained a State Partnership Program with Poland since 1993. Aside from military-to-military and military-to-civilian exchanges and co-training, the Illinois National Guard also co-deploys troops with Polish forces, first to Iraq and now to Afghanistan. The Illinois National Guard’s Bilateral Embedded Support Team (BEST) has approximately 20 servicemembers serving with a Polish brigade in Afghanistan today. Poland has served as a staunch ally of the United States in Europe and throughout the world.

====

Germany Hosts Warplanes For NATO Response Force 2012 Exercise

http://www.usafe.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123273779

U.S. Air Forces in Europe
September 29, 2011

Exercise Brilliant Arrow hits bulls-eye on international relations
by Senior Airmen Ethan Morgan and Jerilyn Quintanilla
100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs

ROYAL AIR FORCE MILDENHALL, England: Germany hosted Exercise Brilliant Arrow, an international multi-service exercise designed as a live flying and command post exercise, Sept. 12 – 23.

Exercise Brilliant Arrow 2011 provided force integration and mission readiness training in preparation for NATO Response Force 2012.

Military Services from Germany, Belgium, Turkey, Lithuania and the United States were among the participating countries. More than 30 aircraft and 1,200 people, operating from 15 different locations, made for a diverse and elaborate operation.

The exercise is specially designed to enhance the professional preparation of multinational air forces…

Editor’s note: Information courtesy of Lutwaffe press office was used in this article.

====

NATO, Oil/Gas: GUAM Ministerial Held During Eastern Partnership Summit

http://en.trend.az/news/politics/1938689.html

Trend News Agency
September 30, 2011

GUAM countries’ foreign ministers define organizational priorities
S. Agayeva

-GUAM was established by Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine in 1997 during the EU presidential summit in Strasbourg.

Baku: The 15th meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers of GUAM was held in Warsaw during the “Eastern Partnership” summit.

The ministers discussed a further deepening of regional cooperation, even at the sectoral level, the GUAM Secretariat said in a statement on Friday.
The meeting’s participants stressed an increase in mutual trade and considered priority tasks for cooperation in GUAM, including prospects for deepening cooperation with the European Union.

Following the meeting, the “Warsaw Declaration of GUAM Council of Foreign Ministers on cooperation prospects and European integration” was signed and the “GUAM Action Plan to enhance sectoral cooperation” approved.
The next meeting’s venue and date for the Ministerial Council will be decided via diplomatic channels.

GUAM was established by Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine in 1997 during the EU presidential summit in Strasbourg. In 1999 Uzbekistan joined the organization for four years.

At the organization’s first summit in Kiev in 2006 it was decided that GUAM was to have the new name “Organization for Democracy and Economic Development – GUAM.”

====

NATO Trains Azerbaijan’s Officer Corps

http://en.trend.az/news/politics/1938585.html

Trend News Agency
September 30, 2011

Azerbaijani officers to attend NATO events
K. Zarbaliyeva

Baku: Azerbaijani officers will take part in a NATO courses on peacekeeping operations in Germany on Oct. 3-7, the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry reported.

Another group of Azerbaijani officers will attend courses on military exercises in Germany.

A courses on logistics troops will be held in Baku on Oct. 3-7. The courses will be led by mobile instructor teams of the NATO Combined Forces Command in Brunssum.

Azerbaijani Armed Forces’ officers will take part in the NATO standardization courses in Poland on Oct. 4-12 and the budget management training in Belgium on Oct. 5-7.

====

Categories: Uncategorized

Aristophanes: Rescuing Peace

September 30, 2011 Leave a comment

Anti-war essays, poems, short stories and literary excerpts

Aristophanes
From Peace
Unknown translator

HERMES
Ah! ah! you are a long way yet from reaching the gods, for they moved yesterday.

TRYGAEUS
To what part of the earth?

HERMES
Eh! of the earth, did you say?

TRYGAEUS
In short, where are they then?

HERMES
Very far, very far, right at the furthest end of the dome of heaven.

TRYGAEUS
But why have they left you all alone here?

HERMES
I am watching what remains of the furniture, the little pots and pans, the bits of chairs and tables, and odd wine-jars.

TRYGAEUS
And why have the gods moved away?

HERMES
Because of their wrath against the Greeks. They have located War in the house they occupied themselves and have given him full power to do with you exactly as he pleases; then they went as high up as ever they could, so as to see no more of your fights and to hear no more of your prayers.

TRYGAEUS
What reason have they for treating us so?

HERMES
Because they have afforded you an opportunity for peace more than once, but you have always preferred war. If the Laconians got the very slightest advantage, they would exclaim, “By the Twin Brethren! the Athenians shall smart for this.” If, on the contrary, the latter triumphed and the Laconians came with peace proposals, you would say, “By Demeter, they want to deceive us. No, by Zeus, we will not hear a word; they will always be coming as long as we hold Pylos.”

TRYGAEUS
Yes, that is quite the style our folk do talk in.

HERMES
So that I don’t know whether you will ever see Peace again.

TRYGAEUS
Why, where has she gone to then?

HERMES
War has cast her into a deep pit.

TRYGAEUS
Where?

HERMES
Down there, at the very bottom. And you see what heaps of stones he has piled over the top, so that you should never pull her out again.

TRYGAEUS
Tell me, what is War preparing against us?

HERMES
All I know is that last evening he brought along a huge mortar.

TRYGAEUS
And what is he going to do with his mortar?

HERMES
He wants to pound up all the cities of Greece in it…But I must say good-bye, for I think he is coming out; what an uproar he is making!
He departs in haste.

TRYGAEUS
Ah! great gods let us seek safety; I think I already hear the noise of this fearful war mortar.
He hides.

WAR enters, carrying a huge mortar
Oh! mortals, mortals, wretched mortals, how your jaws will snap!

TRYGAEUS
Oh! divine Apollo! what a prodigious big mortar! Oh, what misery the very sight of War causes me! This then is the foe from whom I fly, who is so cruel, so formidable, so stalwart, so solid on his legs!

WAR
Oh! Prasiae! thrice wretched, five times, aye, a thousand times wretched! for thou shalt be destroyed this day.
He throws some leeks into the mortar.

TRYGAEUS to the audience
This, gentlemen, does not concern us over much; it’s only so much the worse for the Laconians.

WAR
Oh! Megara! Megara! utterly are you going to be ground up! what fine mincemeat are you to be made into!
He throws in some garlic.

TRYGAEUS aside
Alas! alas! what bitter tears there will be among the Megarians!

WAR throwing in some cheese
Oh, Sicily! you too must perish! Your wretched towns shall be grated like this cheese. Now let us pour some Attic honey into the mortar.
He does so.

*****

TRYGAES
Yes, certainly. So therefore, Hermes, my friend, help us with your whole heart to find and deliver the captive and we will celebrate the great Panathenaea in your honour as well as all the festivals of the other gods; for Hermes shall be the Mysteries. the Dipolia, the Adonia; everywhere the towns, freed from their miseries, will sacrifice to Hermes the Liberator; you will be loaded with benefits of every kind, and to start with, I offer you this cup for libations as your first present.

HERMES
Ah! how golden cups do influence me! Come, friends. get to work. To the pit quickly, pick in hand, and drag away the stones.

LEADER OF THE CHORUS
We go, but you, cleverest of all the gods, supervise our labours; tell us, good workman as you are, what we must do; we shall obey your orders with alacrity.
They begin to lift the stones.

TRYGAEUS
Quick, reach me your cup, and let us preface our work by addressing prayers to the gods.

HERMES
Libation! Libation! Silence! Let us offer our libations and our prayers, so that this day may begin an era of unalloyed happiness for Greece and that he who has bravely pulled at the rope with us may never resume his buckler.

TRYGAEUS
Aye, may we pass our lives in peace, caressing our mistresses and poking the fire.

HERMES
May he who would prefer the war, oh Dionysus…

TRYGAEUS
Be ever drawing barbed arrows out of his elbows.

HERMES
If there be a citizen, greedy for military rank and honours, who refuses, oh, divine Peace! to restore you to daylight…

TRYGAEUS
May he behave as cowardly as Cleonymus on the battlefield.

HERMES
If a lance-maker or a dealer in shields desires war for the sake of better trade…

TRYGAEUS
May he be taken by pirates and eat nothing but barley.

HERMES
If some ambitious man does not help us, because he wants to become a General, or if a slave is plotting to pass over to the enemy…

TRYGAEUS
Let his limbs be broken on the wheel, may he be beaten to death with rods!

*****

PEACE is drawn out of the pit. With her come OPORA and THEORIA.

TRYGAEUS
Oh! venerated goddess, who givest us our grapes, where am I to find the ten-thousand-gallon words wherewith to greet thee? I have none such at home. Oh! hail to thee, Opora, and thee, Theoria! How beautiful is thy face! How sweet thy breath! What gentle fragrance comes from thy bosom, gentle as freedom from military duty, as the most dainty perfumes!

TRYGAEUS
Oh! hateful soldier! your hideous satchel makes me sick! it stinks like the belching of onions, whereas this lovable deity has the odour of sweet fruits, of festivals, of the Dionysia, of the harmony of flutes, of the tragic poets, of the verses of Sophocles, of the phrases of Euripides…

TRYGAEUS
Listen, good folk! Let the husbandmen take their farming tools and return to their fields as quickly as possible, but without either sword, spear or javelin. All is as quiet as if Peace had been reigning for a century. Come, let everyone go and till the earth, singing the Paean.

LEADER OF THE CHORUS to PEACE
Oh, thou, whom men of standing desired and who art good to husbandmen, I have gazed upon thee with delight; and now I go to greet my vines, to caress after so long an absence the fig trees I planted in my youth.

TRYGAEUS
See, how their iron spades glitter and how beautifully their three-pronged mattocks glisten in the sun! How regularly they align the plants! I also burn to go into the country and to turn over the earth I have so long neglected. Friends, do you remember the happy life that Peace afforded us formerly; can you recall the splendid baskets of figs, both fresh and dried, the myrtles, the sweet wine, the violets blooming near the spring, and the olives, for which we have wept so much? Worship, adore the goddess for restoring you so many blessings.

CHORUS singing
Hail! hail! thou beloved divinity! thy return overwhelms us with joy. When far from thee, my ardent wish to see my fields again made me pine with regret. From thee came all blessings. Oh! much desired Peace! thou art the sole support of those who spend their lives tilling the earth. Under thy rule we had a thousand delicious enjoyments at our beck; thou wert the husbandman’s wheaten cake and his safeguard. So that our vineyards, our young fig-tree woods and all our plantations hail thee with delight and smile at thy coming.

Categories: Uncategorized

Updates on Libyan war/Stop NATO news: September 29, 2011

September 29, 2011 2 comments

====

Libya: 24,236 NATO Air Missions, 9,040 Combat Sorties

Libya: NATO Air Strikes Destroy Central Sirte

NATO Continues To Bombard Sirte, Though Resistance Holds Out

U.S. Warplanes In Iraq Till 2020; $3 Billion F-16 Deal Signed

Defense Minister: Turkey Mulls Ground Operations In Iraq

Skopje: Turkey Backs Macedonia’s NATO, EU Integration

UN Security Council Session On Kosovo: West Versus The Rest

NATO Deploys Armored Vehicles Against Kosovo Serbs

Tensions Remain At Serbia-Kosovo Border

Video And Text: NATO Provoking New Balkans, European, World Conflict – Russian Envoy

Russian Ambassador On NATO Firing At Kosovo Serbs: Irresponsibility Of This Sort Leads To War

U.S. Condemns “Violent Attack By Serb Mob” On NATO Troops

UN Security Council To Meet On Kosovo Violence

Kosovo Protected War Crimes Witness Found Dead In Germany

Kosovo: Another War Crimes Witness Fears For His Life

Women, Children Among 19 Killed In NATO-Led Afghan Operation

Five NATO Soldiers Killed In Afghanistan

More U.S. Military Actions In Pakistan Possible: Senator Graham

U.S.-Pakistan Crisis: Watershed Or Waterloo?

Pakistan: U.S. Seeks Scapegoat For Failed Afghan Policy

NATO Acknowledges First Strike Interceptor Missile Plans

U.S. ABM Options: Destabilizing Pre-Emptive Strike, Retaliation, Interception

Georgia Prepared To Host U.S.-NATO Interceptor Missile Radar

Tense Atmosphere At NATO-Russia Talks On Missile Shield

Netherlands To Join NATO Interceptor Missile System

NATO Implements Second Layer Of Continental Missile Shield

U.S.-Led Team Wins European Theater Interceptor Missile Contract

Netherlands Extends Libya War Mission

40 Aircraft: Attack Helicopter In Scotland Ahead Of Major NATO Exercise

NATO Formalizes Complete Absorption Of Bulgaria

U.S. Marks 19th Anniversary Of Restructuring Bulgarian Military For NATO

Florida: Pentagon Trains Balkans, Caucasus, Eastern European Navies

Poland Slams Belarus For Foreign Minister’s No-Show At Eastern Partnership Summit

Eastern Partnership: EU Targets “Frozen Conflicts,” “Color” Changes

20 Million Tons Of Azeri, Kazakh Oil For Caspian-Baltic Pipelines

Bryza: U.S. To Protect Caspian Energy Infrastructure

British Energy Minister: Caspian Gas To Europe Soon As Possible

West Completes Caspian Energy War Plans

====

Libya: 24,236 NATO Air Missions, 9,040 Combat Sorties

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_09/20110929_110929-oup-update.pdf

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 29, 2011

NATO and Libya
Allied Joint Force Command NAPLES, SHAPE, NATO HQ

Over the past 24 hours, NATO has conducted the following activities associated with Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR:

Air Operations

Since the beginning of the NATO operation (31 March 2011, 06.00GMT) a total of 24,236 sorties, including 9,040 strike sorties, have been conducted.

Sorties conducted 28 SEPTEMBER: 96

Strike sorties conducted 28 SEPTEMBER: 30

====

Libya: NATO Air Strikes Destroy Central Sirte

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/28/56895822.html

Itar-Tass/Voice of Russia
September 28, 2011

Sirte destroyed by NATO raid


Photo: EPA

Fresh NATO air raids have all but destroyed the central part of Gaddaf’s home city Sirte, where his loyalists are still holding out.

The anti-Gaddafi side is bringing in troops to reinforce its siege of the Mediterranean port.

====

NATO Continues To Bombard Sirte, Though Resistance Holds Out

http://www.cadenagramonte.cu/english/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7292:nato-bombs-sirte-resistance-persists-in-some-fronts&catid=3:world&Itemid=14

Prensa Latina
September 28, 2011

NATO Bombs Sirte; Resistance Persists in Some Fronts           

Tripoli: NATO warplanes strengthened on Wednesday air raids over Sirte backing the rebels´ land offensive, although those loyal to leader Muammar Gaddafi continue resisting in this city and two other southern strongholds.
Reports coming from Sirte, Gaddafi´s hometown, noted that pro-Gaddafi forces controls the downtown of the city despite NATO´s four-day-in-a-row air raids.

Rebels have captured many territories but are still facing a strong pro-Gaddafi resistance, according to numerous contradictory press reports that differ from the deliberately conflicting and triumphalist statements of the National Transitional Council though.

A NTC military source claimed that the rebels fully controlled the harbor in Sirte and some downtown areas as part of a strategy to advance from the eastern periphery and join the brigades deployed in the western flank.

Despite the fact that the NTC claimed that Bani Walid succumbed to its attacks, the rebels only control some outlying neighborhoods, but pro-Gaddafi artillery response prevents them from approaching the city´s downtown, where locals support Gaddafi.

Sabha, which was also declared as “liberated” a week ago, is still not fully controlled by the rebels, who are not backed by the people, even though they set up a NTC headquarter in the Al-Gurtha neighborhood and checkpoints in the roads that lead to the city´s downtown.

====

U.S. Warplanes In Iraq Till 2020; $3 Billion F-16 Deal Signed

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/28/501364/main20112723.shtml

CBS News/Associated Press
September 28, 2011

U.S.: Iraq inks $3B deal for F-16 fighter jets

-The deal has been in the works for years, but was shelved in February when Iraq decided to spend more on food rations for its poor before buying the fighter jets. In August, however, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki announced Iraq would buy 32 fighter jets — twice as many as originally planned.
-Iraq has said its air force is not ready to protect its air space alone, and the country’s top-ranked military officer last year said U.S. help may be needed until 2020.

BAGHDAD – Iraq has signed an estimated $3 billion deal to buy 18 fighter jets from the United States, officials said Tuesday…

The F-16s aren’t expected to arrive in Iraq until next fall at the earliest, and more likely not until 2013 — meaning U.S. troops may still be asked to patrol the country’s skies and train its air force for months, if not years, to come.

But U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Michael Ferriter called the F-16 deal “a game-changing capability.”

Iraq has said its air force is not ready to protect its air space alone, and the country’s top-ranked military officer last year said U.S. help may be needed until 2020.

Iraq’s Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told The Associated Press in an interview on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly in New York that the importance of the deal is “for the world to know that Iraq is an ally of the United States in the region.”

The deal has been in the works for years, but was shelved in February when Iraq decided to spend more on food rations for its poor before buying the fighter jets. In August, however, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki announced Iraq would buy 32 fighter jets — twice as many as originally planned.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh cited a recent push to revive the F-16 deal “because the country’s security is important, and the air force is the backbone for Iraq’s defense.”

The jets come with a package to train Iraqi pilots for up to 18 months and is valued at $3 billion, according to another senior U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the security deal. Al-Dabbagh said $1.4 billion has already been transferred as a partial payment.

Ferriter said it’s still up to Iraq’s government to decide if it wants U.S. forces to do some of the training, or leave it all to private contractors.

Zebari, the Iraqi foreign minister, said “the idea, the policy, is to reach some training mission arrangements, agreement” with the United States.

At least some of the training — including English-language classes — will be done in the United States, he said.

Washington is especially concerned about Iran’s extended influence in Baghdad and instability throughout the region. Negotiations to keep a few thousand American troops in Iraq next year are ongoing, although officials on both sides say little progress has been made.

====

Defense Minister: Turkey Mulls Ground Operations In Iraq

http://en.trend.az/regions/met/turkey/1938445.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

Minister: Turkey considers launching ground raid in northern Iraq
A. Taghiyeva

Baku: Turkey is considering launching a ground raid in northern Iraq, and if the country’s security forces decide that a ground raid is necessary the authorities will take appropriate action, the Anadolu news agency quotes the Turkish Defense Minister Ismet Yilmaz as telling journalists on Thursday.

Air strikes were conducted after [an] attack in southeastern Turkey on Aug. 17, in which nine Turkish servicemen were killed.

These were the first strikes by Turkey in northern Iraq in more than a year.

====

Skopje: Turkey Backs Macedonia’s NATO, EU Integration

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-258365-pm-erdogan-supports-macedonias-eu-nato-bid.html

Zaman
September 29, 2011

PM Erdoğan supports Macedonia’s EU, NATO bid

-Erdoğan is going to visit several cities in Macedonia as his visit coincides with the 20th anniversary of Macedonia’s independence and the 10th anniversary of the Ohrid Framework Agreement, the [NATO-EU-U.S.] peace deal signed by the government of the Republic of Macedonia and ethnic Albanian representatives on Aug. 13, 2001. The agreement ended an armed conflict between the National Liberation Army and the Macedonian security forces…

İSTANBUL: Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has said Macedonia will enter the European Union soon and that Turkey supports its integration into NATO during a trip to the country this week.

Answering questions in Skopje on Thursday at a joint press conference with Macedonian Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski, Erdoğan said the country is likely to enter the EU before Turkey since its accession process is proceeding quickly.

Turkey’s prime minister said he sees Macedonia as an important actor for maintaining peace, stability and prosperity in the Balkans. Erdoğan said Turkey hoped Macedonia would become a NATO member as soon as possible.

Erdoğan was critical of the Greek government’s attitude, which has been blocking the country’s NATO membership over a name dispute. Greece does not allow Macedonia to be called the Republic of Macedonia because of its own region of Macedonia. Greece claims that Macedonia, if it keeps the name, might territorially claim the Greek northern province of Macedonia.

“Turkey has always supported Macedonia, particularly its bid to integrate into Euro-Atlantic institutions, since it gained its independence, and will continue to do so,” Erdoğan told a press conference before he left Ankara for Macedonia.

Turkey, a NATO member which became one of the first countries to recognize Macedonia by its constitutional name, is a staunch supporter of Skopje becoming a member of NATO. Macedonia gained independence from Yugoslavia with little bloodshed in 1991.

Erdoğan, who is visiting Macedonia from Sept. 29-30 as a guest of PM Gruevski, said Turkey and Macedonia shared a common history and culture for almost six centuries. The prime minister will meet with ethnic Turks living in Macedonia and listen to their expectations and demands.

Erdoğan is going to visit several cities in Macedonia as his visit coincides with the 20th anniversary of Macedonia’s independence and the 10th anniversary of the Ohrid Framework Agreement, the [NATO-EU-U.S.] peace deal signed by the government of the Republic of Macedonia and ethnic Albanian representatives on Aug. 13, 2001. The agreement ended an armed conflict between the National Liberation Army and the Macedonian security forces…

The agreement also included provisions for altering the official languages of the country, with any language spoken by over 20 percent of the population becoming co-official with the Macedonian language on a municipal level. Currently, only Albanian with an approximate 25 percent of the population fulfils this criterion.

Upon arrival to Macedonia, Erdoğan visited Skopje Alexander the Great Airport, constructed by the Turkish firm TAV Construction, together with his Macedonian counterpart. Erdoğan is accompanied by Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdağ and Education Minister Ömer Dinçer.

Meanwhile, İstanbul Mayor Kadir Topbaş is in Skopje, a sister city of İstanbul, to meet with his counterpart, Trifun Kostovski. Erdoğan and Topbaş will attend a graduation ceremony at the International Balkan University on Friday.

====

UN Security Council Session On Kosovo: West Versus The Rest

http://en.rian.ru/world/20110929/167243844.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 29, 2011

UN Security Council fails to agree on Northern Kosovo

SARAEVO: Member states of the UN Security Council failed to find a common approach to the situation in Northern Kosovo, the Belgrade-based Tanjug news agency said on Thursday.

At Russia’s request, the Security Council gathered for emergency consultations in New York late on Wednesday to discuss the recent flare-up of tension in Kosovo.

Four NATO soldiers and seven Serb protesters were wounded on Tuesday in clashes between locals and the military at the disputed Kosovo northern border crossing with Serbia known as Jarinje. The incident disrupted a regular round of consultations between Belgrade and Pristina.

“Most UN Security Council members showed they understood the severity of the situation [in Kosovo],” diplomatic sources told Tanjug.

Western countries in the UN Security Council believe the situation in northern Kosovo is under control, and the EULEX and KFOR security forces are acting in line with their UN mandate. They said the Kosovo issue should be solved only through dialog with the mediation of the European Union.

The United States condemned the incident, describing it as a “violent attack by a Serb mob,” and called on all the sides to remain calm and resume dialog.

The Russian Foreign Ministry expressed concern about the rising tensions in Kosovo, saying that “indulging the Kosovo-Albanian side promotes the growth of its aggression, its unwillingness to seek compromise solutions and to consider the legitimate interests of all ethnic groups living in Kosovo.”

The ministry also reiterated its appeal to the international presence to “strictly stick to the principle of neutrality status.”

Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic met with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in New York on the sidelines of the 66th UN General Assembly in New York and provided him with all information about the border incident, the BETA news agency said.

—————————————————————————-

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=29&nav_id=76609

Tanjug News Agency
September 29, 2011

Security Council again without common stance on Kosovo

NEW YORK: The UN Security Council finished consultations late Wednesday without a common stance on the situation in northern Kosovo, Tanjug has learned.

In the closed-doors meeting held at Russia’s request, Western countries reiterated their earlier position that the problems in northern Kosovo could only be solved through dialogue, with the mediation of the EU, said the sources.

Western countries in the UN Security Council believe the situation in northern Kosovo is under control, and EULEX and KFOR are acting in line with the mandate given to them by the UN.

Most UN Security Council members showed they understood the severity of the situation in the Serbian province, the sources said.

The consultations were held at the request of Russia, which expressed concern Tuesday over the violence against the Serb population permitted by the international KFOR troops, at the same time urging KFOR and EULEX to remain strictly status-neutral.

The consultations followed a confrontation which erupted Tuesday at the Jarinje administrative crossing between KFOR troops and local Serbs, in which 11 people were wounded – seven Serbs and four KFOR members.

====

NATO Deploys Armored Vehicles Against Kosovo Serbs

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=29&nav_id=76616

B92
September 29, 2011

KFOR starts demolishing alternative road

KOSOVSKA MITROVICA: KFOR troops exited their base at the Jarinje checkpoint and blocked the road with two armored cars on Thursday.

They have started demolishing an alternative Kosovska Mitrovica-Raška road with dredgers.

The two KFOR armored vehicles are parked only several hundred meters from the Jarinje checkpoint, a B92 reporter has said.

The situation in Kosovo is otherwise peaceful. Serbs reinforced a barricade in Kosovska Mitrovica last night.

Kosovo police arrested a Serb under suspicion of taking part in an incident in Kosovska Mitrovica yesterday, when three persons were injured, Kosovo police Spokesman Besim Hoti.

====

Tensions Remain At Serbia-Kosovo Border

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/29/56935628.html

Voice of Russia
September 29, 2011

No calm at Serbian-Kosovo border
Lyudmila Morozova

The UN Security Council has held closed-door consultations on the situation in northern Kosovo but its member states have once again failed to work out a single stand. On September 28th, Russia initiated an emergency session following clashes between locals and troops of the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR) near the Yarine checkpoint at the administrative Serbia-Kosovo border. 

What is meant here is a conflict at two checkpoints controlled by the northern Kosovo Serbs. Back in July this year, the self-proclaimed republic’s Albanian authorities attempted to get them under control but failed in their endeavors. Today, the support of NATO forces and European police finally helped the Albanians appoint their customs and police officers at the two disputed checkpoints of Yarine and Brnyak. In response, the local Serbs blocked both of them, says head of the Institute of Europe’s group of ethno-political conflicts Dr. Pavel Kandel:

“The Serbs are opposed to the presence of Kosovo customs officers there and naturally try to force them out. The Kosovo authorities, in their turn, seek to bring their own officials to the checkpoints, thus making the best use of KFOR peacekeepers’ support and tearing off northern Kosovo from Serbia. It is quite natural that the indignant local Serbs arranged a demonstration resulting in clashes with the KFOR and subsequent injuries,” Pavel Kandel explains.

Seven Serbs and four KFOR servicemen were injured in the incident. In response to accusations of violence on the part of NATO, the peacekeepers were said to have only shot for self-defense purposes.

Speaking at the latest Russia-NATO Council session, Russian envoy to the Alliance Dmitry Rogozin demanded an inquiry into the shooting of Kosovo Serbs near the Yarine checkpoint. “Irresponsibility of this sort leads to a war,” the official said.

====

Video And Text: NATO Provoking New Balkans, European, World Conflict – Russian Envoy

http://rt.com/news/kosovo-nato-conflict-603/

RT
September 28, 2011

NATO provoking another conflict in Balkans – Rogozin

Video

The NATO peacekeeping force KFOR has sent more troops to the Serbian-Kosovo border following bloody clashes there. But as Russia’s envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin told RT, the alliance is creating a new conflict in the region.

“It’s another mistake that NATO is making by provoking another conflict in the Balkans,” Dmitry Rogozin said.

According to witnesses, KFOR has deployed armored vehicles, sandbags and barbed wire around the Jarinje border crossing, about 100 km (60 miles) from Kosovo’s capital, Pristina, on Wednesday.

“It seems my NATO colleagues don’t have a clue what the consequences of their involvement in the conflict could be,” Dmitry Rogozin said. “Instead of taking a neutral position in accordance with the UN Security Council resolution, they took the side of Kosovo-Albania. Basically, NATO is blocking the only road of life between the Kosovan Serbs and Serbia. It’s the international peacekeepers who are involved in the civil conflict in the north of the region.”

NATO reinforced the border a day after clashes which left 16 Kosovo Serbs and four KFOR members injured.

Milan Jakovljević, the director of Kosovska Mitrovica Health Center, said six people sustained serious injuries from live rounds and one person had been taken to the ophthalmology ward due to eye problems caused by tear-gas, Serbian radio and television broadcaster B92 reported.

Both sides blame each other for starting the violence, in which rubber bullets and tear-gas were used by NATO forces.

It is believed the clashes took place when alliance peacekeeping forces tried to dismantle a roadblock set up by Serbs. NATO’s spokesperson insists that KFOR troops had fired on Serb protesters in the Mitrovica region in response to an attack by the crowd.

Meanwhile, according to Rogozin, NATO does not want to discuss the situation in Kosovo or to investigate the latest bloody accident. 

“They are hiding behind formal phrases that mean nothing,” he said.

“We are witnessing outright lies about what kinds of measures have been used against the civilian population in Kosovo. We have been told that only rubber bullets and tear-gas were used. But according to the information from the hospital, all the injured have gunshot wounds. And physicians from Mitrovica complained about the bombardment of ambulances, which were transporting the wounded from the conflict zone,” Rogozin told Interfax news agency.

Russia has demanded that NATO creates a commission to investigate what happened in the region.

“I have just asked for an objective investigation into what the so-called NATO peacekeepers are doing in Kosovo. But they just ignored my question,” Rogozin said. “If NATO is concerned about its reputation they should stop this immediately, become neutral again, and investigate the crimes that have taken place against the civilians in northern Kosovo,” he added.

He stressed that Russia would support and protect civilians, and would also protect decisions made by the UN Security Council. 

John Laughland of the Paris-based Institute for Democracy and Cooperation agrees the deployment of KFOR troops has reactivated a ‘frozen conflict.’

“If they took away their newly sent force from the borders between the northern Kosovo and the rest of Serbia, then yes, I do think that the region would go back to being peaceful,” John Laughland told RT.

====

Russian Ambassador On NATO Firing At Kosovo Serbs: Irresponsibility Of This Sort Leads To War

http://www.itar-tass.com/en/c32/235813.html

Itar-Tass
September 28, 2011

Ambassador demands investigation of NATO’s firing at Kosovan Serbs

BRUSSELS: Russia’s ambassador to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin has issued a demand that NATO officials investigate the incident, in which NATO forces opened fire at Kosovan Serbs near the Jarinje check-post in Kosovo.

He wrote about his demand at his Twitter microblog.

“I’ve demand an investigation of the fact of fire by NATO servicemen at Kosovan Serbs, who protested against the blocking of the administrative border between Kosovo and Serbia,” Rogozin said.

“What I’ve heard in response is apologies only,” he said. “Irresponsibility of this sort leads to a war.”

Earlier, a demand to investigate the incident was made by Serbia’s President Boris Tadic, who had a telephone conversation with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen.

Tuesday, KFOR servicemen made an attempt to pull down the barricades that the Kosovan Serbs had put up in front of the Jarinje check-post. They opened fire with rubber bullets and used teargas after the Serbs had thrown several stones at them.

In retaliation, the Serbs hurled a few improvised bombs at the troops.
The incident left four KFOR soldiers and seven Serbs wounded.

====

U.S. Condemns “Violent Attack By Serb Mob” On NATO Troops

http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n260507

Focus News Agency
September 29, 2011

US condemns violence in Kosovo

Washington: The United States on Wednesday condemned what it called a “violent attack by a Serb mob” against NATO peacekeepers at a checkpoint in northern Kosovo, calling for calm from Pristina and Belgrade, AFP reported.

The State Department said that nine members of the alliance’s KFOR peacekeeping force were injured in Tuesday’s incident on the disputed border. An earlier toll said four peacekeepers were hurt.

“The United States condemns the violent attack by a Serb mob against the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR) on September 27th,” it said in a statement.

“We encourage the governments of Kosovo and Serbia to remain committed to the EU-facilitated dialogue process, to encourage calm, and to find agreements that improve the lives of the ordinary citizens in both countries,” it said.

Those talks – the latest round in a six-month bid by the European Union to help settle friction between the two neighbors – were shelved on Wednesday.

====

UN Security Council To Meet On Kosovo Violence

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/28/56888906.html

Voice of Russia
September 28, 2011

Russia calls for discussion on Kosovo

       
Russia hopes the NATO contingent in Kosovo will prevent separatist violence against the Kosovo Serbs.

The Russian NATO Ambassador was speaking about this Wednesday after the Alliance refused to discuss regional instability from the Kosovo crisis on its joint council with Russia.

Two weeks ago, there were clashes and casualties after the separatist authorities seized two crossing points from Serb-populated northern Kosovo to southern Serbia.

KFOR attacks Kosovo Serbs

Representatives of the Serbian community in Macedonia are indignant at the groundless attack of the KFOR international security force in Kosovo against Kosovo Serbs, Ivan Stoilkovic,  leader of the Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia, declared to the ITAR-TASS news agency on Wednesday.

“According to its status, KFOR is to remain neutral and protect citizens rather than get into conflicts with them,” he pointed out. “There can be no excuse for the outrageous behaviour of KFOR servicemen who tried to cold-bloodedly kill people only for being Serbian.”

The clash occurred at the security check-point on the administrative border between Serbia and the self-proclaimed republic. The Serbs were protesting against the Kosovo administration establishing control over the security check-point.

The UN Security Council will meet to discuss the Kosovo issue over clashes between KFOR troops and Serbian forces.

The UN press-service says the session will be held behind closed doors.

====

Kosovo Protected War Crimes Witness Found Dead In Germany

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/crimes-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=28&nav_id=76608

Tanjug News Agency
September 28, 2011

Protected witness in ex-KLA trial found dead

PRIŠTINA: A protected witness in the village of Klecka war crimes case was found dead, EULEX Spokeswoman Irina Gudeljević told Tanjug.

According to her, the protected witness was found dead in a park in Germany.

The German authorities are investigating the case. The protected witness was Kosovo Albanian Agim Zogaj. He was supposed to testify in the trial of ex-Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) member Fatmir Limaj and nine more persons for war crimes in Klečka. The trial is expected to begin by the end of October.

Limaj, who has been under house arrest since last week, will be tried on an indictment charging him with war crimes against civilians and prisoners of war.

The Priština District Court, headed by a EULEX judge, prolonged custody to the group of nine accused for another two months.

Limaj and other defendants are charged with murders, torture and health endangerment of Albanian and Serb civilians from Kosovo and prisoners of war.
—————————————————————————-

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/28/us-kosovo-war-crimes-idUSTRE78R5O320110928

Reuters
September 28, 2011

Kosovo war crimes witness found dead in Germany

PRISTINA: A witness in a war crimes case against a member of Kosovo’s parliament has been found dead in Germany, an EU police and justice mission (EULEX) spokesman said on Wednesday.

Ruling party parliamentarian Fatmir Limaj, who was put under house arrest last week, and nine other people arrested in March are accused of committing murder, torture and violations of the human rights of ethnic Albanians, Serbs and prisoners during Kosovo’s 1998-99 war with Serbia.

Agim Zogaj, known as witness X in the war crimes case, was found dead in a German park, said EULEX spokesman Blerim Krasniqi, adding: “The German authorities are conducting the necessary investigation to determine the circumstances of his death.”

A German police spokesman said investigators suspected that Zogaj killed himself but the investigation was still in progress and the police were waiting for the coroner’s report.

“There are no indications it was anything else,” the police spokesman said. He added an autopsy would be carried out on Thursday.

Zogaj, who was a soldier under Limaj’s command during Kosovo’s war for independence, was sent to Germany as a protected witness. Police would not confirm media reports in Kosovo that he had killed himself.

Those charged are former members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which fought Serb forces for independence.

Limaj, an ally of Prime Minister Hashim Thaci, was a leading figure in the KLA.

…Limaj was acquitted by The Hague war crimes tribunal in 2005, two years after he was indicted on similar charges.

Limaj also faces corruption charges relating to his time as transport minister in a previous government.

(Additional reporting by Joseph Nasr in Berlin; Editing by Myra MacDonald)

====

Kosovo: Another War Crimes Witness Fears For His Life

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/crimes-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=29&nav_id=76621

Beta News Agency
September 29, 2011

Witness in ex-KLA trial fears for safety, won’t testify

BELGRADE: A potential witness of the prosecution in ex-Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) commander Fatmir Limaj has said that he does not want to testify for safety reasons.

The witness informed the deputy prosecutor on Thursday, after learning of protected witness Agim Zogaj’s death, that he did not want to testify in the Klečka case for safety reasons.

“The Serbian War Crimes Prosecution believes that justice in the region is jeopardized by Agim Zogaj’s death and expresses concern over the information that Zogaj, a protected witness in the EULEX Prosecution’s case against Fatmir Limaj, was found dead in a park in Duisburg, Germany,” it was announced on Thursday.

The Serbian prosecution stressed that its 2008 investigation against Limaj and 28 more KLA members had greatly contributed to EULEX Prosecution’s case.

Aside from Limaj, the EULEX indictment charges nine more persons with war crimes against Serb and Albanian civilians in the village of Klečka in 1999.

—————————————————————————-

http://rt.com/news/kosovo-crimes-witness-dead-647/

RT
September 29, 2011

Key Kosovo war crimes witness found dead

A key witness in a war crimes trial in Kosovo has been found dead in Germany. He had apparently committed suicide.

Nicholas Hawton, an EU spokesman in Kosovo, said on Wednesday Agim Zogaj’s body was discovered in a city park in Duisburg, reports Associated Press.

Police believe that he hanged himself late on Tuesday.

Zogaj was a protected witness in the trial of Fatmir Limaj. The ethnic Albanian and former transport minister under Prime Minister Hashim Thaci is suspected of unlawfully killing and torturing Serb prisoners during the 1998-99 Kosovo war. Many of the charges were based on Zogaj’s witness statements.

Limaj, who remains an influential political figure in Kosovo, is also under investigation over alleged embezzlement of budget money during his time in the cabinet.

Last week, the former commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army was put under a month-long house arrest by a judge of the EU Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo pending his trial for war crimes. 

Limaj was cleared of similar charges by a UN court in 2005 which ruled there was insufficient evidence to convict him.

====

Women, Children Among 19 Killed In NATO-Led Afghan Operation

http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2011/09/28/19-civilians-killed-nuristan-operation-mps

Pajhwok Afghan News
September 28, 2011

19 civilians killed in Nuristan operation: MPs
By Abasin Zaheer

KABUL: Afghan and foreign forces killed 19 civilians, including women and children, during an operation on Sept. 20 in eastern Nuristan province, a parliamentarian said on Wednesday.

Militants had fled the Want Waigal district before the operation was launched, a Wolesi Jirga member from the province, Maulvi Ahadullah Mowahid, told a press conference in Kabul.

“For two days, foreign forces did not allow locals to collect the dead bodies that were eaten by animals,” the legislator alleged, claiming provincial authorities were not taken into confidence over the operations.

Mowahid said a hospital and several shops in the remote district also came under attack during the offensive, he said.

Another member of the assembly from Nuristan, Hazrat Shah Nuristani, said tribal elder Juma Gul was stabbed to death and several locals were arrested by NATO-led troops. “Such actions only widen the gap between the government and the people.”

Provincial council chief, Qazi Inayatullah Mazhabyar, said the district had been under the Taliban’s control for the past six months but the fighters left it as a result of the operation.

“The combined force came to the district, killed innocent people and once again left Want Waigal to militants,” he remarked.

====

Five NATO Soldiers Killed In Afghanistan

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/southasia/news/article_1665686.php/Five-foreign-soldiers-killed-in-Afghanistan

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
September 28, 2011

Five foreign soldiers killed in Afghanistan

Kabul: Five soldiers with the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) were killed Wednesday in separate incidents in Afghanistan, the military coalition said.

Three ISAF service members died following an improvised explosive device attack in eastern Afghanistan on Wednesday, ISAF said in a statement.

In a separate incident, one soldier died as a result of a non-battle related injury in southern Afghanistan.

ISAF did not release details about the deceased or exactly where the incidents took place.

Earlier in the day, ISAF said one soldier had died following an insurgent attack in Wardak province, bordering Kabul.

Even though military officials have projected a fragile gain, violence has erupted recently in much of Afghanistan, including the capital.

The United Nations said Wednesday Afghanistan was witnessing ‘considerable political volatility and disconcerting levels of insecurity’ with average monthly ‘security incidents’ up by 39 per cent through August, compared to the same period in 2010.

Last month was the deadliest for US and NATO allies in Afghanistan, according to an independent tally website, iCasualties.org.

At least 81 international soldiers died in Afghanistan, the highest this year, of which 70 were Americans, the highest casualties in a month for the US forces since the war started in 2001.

====

More U.S. Military Actions In Pakistan Possible: Senator Graham

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/29/us-pakistan-usa-graham-idUSTRE78S0CZ20110929

Reuters
September 28, 2011

More U.S. military action in Pakistan possible: Graham
By Missy Ryan and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON: Support is growing in the U.S. Congress for expanding American military action in Pakistan beyond drone strikes already used to target militants in Pakistani territory, a senior Republican U.S. senator says.

The comments by Senator Lindsey Graham, an influential Republican voice on foreign policy and military affairs, follow remarks by the top U.S. military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, accusing Pakistan last week of supporting the militant Haqqani network’s September 13 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

With growing calls for a tougher stance on militants accused of such high-profile attacks, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday that Washington was closer to deciding whether to label the Haqqanis a terrorist group.

Graham said in an interview on Tuesday that U.S. lawmakers might support military options beyond drone strikes that have been going on for years inside Pakistani territory.

Those options may include using U.S. bomber planes within Pakistan. The South Carolina Republican said he did not advocate sending U.S. ground troops into Pakistan.

“I would say when it comes to defending American troops, you don’t want to limit yourself,” Graham said. “This is not a boots-on-the-ground engagement — I’m not talking about that, but we have a lot of assets beyond drones.

“A perfect world … would be Afghan, Pakistan and (U.S. and NATO) coalition forces working jointly on both sides of border to deny safe havens, inside of Afghanistan and on the other side,” in Pakistan’s western tribal regions from which the Haqqani network and other militants are believed to operate, Graham said.

Graham said U.S. lawmakers will think about stepping up the military pressure. “If people believe it’s gotten to the point that that is the only way really to protect our interests, I think there would be a lot of support,” he said.

Increased U.S. military action on Pakistani soil, including the idea of U.S. soldiers crossing the porous border from Afghanistan, would be deeply unpopular in Pakistan. Pakistan viewed the U.S. military raid in May that killed al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden as a grievous breach of its sovereignty.

The tense ties between Pakistan and the United States worsened last week after Mullen, the chairman of the U.S. military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, described the Haqqani network as a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s ISI spy agency.

Graham, known as a hawk, said on Sunday that the United States must consider all options “including defending our troops” in confronting Pakistani support for militant networks active in Afghanistan.

Such remarks from the U.S. Congress, where patience has worn thin with Pakistan, have intensified speculation that the United States might resort to another cross-border raid such as the one that killed bin Laden, intensify drone attacks in Pakistan’s lawless tribal regions or send in bomber planes to attack militant hide-outs.

Lawmakers are proposing to restrict U.S. aid with stricter conditions under which Pakistan, which possesses nuclear arms but is desperately poor, can access U.S. military and economic assistance.

The unusually public criticism from Washington has provoked anger among Pakistani leaders who warn that the United States may lose a key ally in an unstable region.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Quinn; editing by Will Dunham and Anthony Boadle)

====

U.S.-Pakistan Crisis: Watershed Or Waterloo?

http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=69976&Cat=9#;

News International
September 29, 2011

Watershed or Waterloo?
Raoof Hasan

-Since the initiation of wars by the US has been part of a jaundiced but unchanging strategy of cultivating strife to keep its arms industry going and to physically occupy all sources of energy, there has been no let-up in its scope or intensity, and there will not be any. Region after region has been mercilessly subjected to US brutality.
-The manner in which governance has been abdicated; state institutions brutalised; rule of law subverted; apex court’s injunctions rubbished; parliament marginalised with its unanimous resolutions consigned to the bin; alleged acts of subversion overlooked; and crooks, criminals and those given reprieve through presidential pardons appointed at key government positions, are just some of the manifestations of a captive political leadership doing America’s job in Pakistan.

The inherent artificiality of US-Pakistan relations was bound to assert itself as it has now. After a spate of bellicose statements from the US military hierarchy directly targeting the military and the ISI, it was the COAS who showed the grit to defend Pakistan’s legitimate strategic interests. The responsibility for doing so rested on the shoulders of the political leadership, but they constitute an important component of the problem that Pakistan is faced with today.

The US is losing the war in Afghanistan just like all previous invaders have. It has lost wars in the past that it started with intention of stamping its illegitimate hegemony on various regions. In the process, it destabilised the world, causing untold mayhem and impoverished millions of people who are still struggling to cope. Since the initiation of wars by the US has been part of a jaundiced but unchanging strategy of cultivating strife to keep its arms industry going and to physically occupy all sources of energy, there has been no let-up in its scope or intensity, and there will not be any. Region after region has been mercilessly subjected to US brutality.

Today, at the receiving end of the US pounding stands Pakistan – a country that has repeatedly compromised its sovereignty considerations to serve an alien cause. I call it alien because there are numerous inherent factors that separate US interests from those of Pakistan.

The US preoccupation with establishing effective control over political and economic developments in Central Asia, to the exclusion of China, is not congruent with Pakistan’s interests while the latter’s strong relations with China and their potential to expedite Pakistan’s development are not convergent with US strategic interests.

The frenetic US endeavour to establish Indian hegemony in this region, as its proxy flag bearer, runs counter to Pakistan’s priorities. Pakistan’s desire to promote reconciliatory initiatives aimed at bringing peace to Afghanistan do not tally with the US aim of securing long-term presence in that country. Pakistan’s nuclear capability is viewed by the US as a threat to its interests and that of its principal ally in the region, India, while Pakistan and its allies view this as an essential requisite for stability in the region.

If Pakistan’s leadership thought that the US would stand down in the face of its military’s increasing assertiveness once its immediate interests had been secured, it was a fatal fallacy. US interests run permanently counter to those of Pakistan and are not likely to change with the passage of time. To force total and unconditional capitulation, the US has wantonly used its vast network of non-state militant collaborators and paid agents to destabilise Pakistan as has been evident from scores of incidents in the recent past.

It is here that one begins to understand the need for crafting the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) and the induction of a tainted and servile political leadership to replace a pliant dictator. The manner in which governance has been abdicated; state institutions brutalised; rule of law subverted; apex court’s injunctions rubbished; parliament marginalised with its unanimous resolutions consigned to the bin; alleged acts of subversion overlooked; and crooks, criminals and those given reprieve through presidential pardons appointed at key government positions, are just some of the manifestations of a captive political leadership doing America’s job in Pakistan. In this, it has been extended support by those who are complicit in endeavours to denude this country of its wealth, employing fraudulent means and push it into permanent enslavement and those who, because of an unmitigated hatred for the armed forces, would tolerate even the most corrupt and complicit government to the exclusion of the army. While it may serve their bloated egos, it is doing no service to Pakistan and its strategic interests.

It may sound trite to state that Pakistan faces its most gruesome existential challenge, but it really does. There is widespread internal strife due to the government’s inability and unwillingness to control the vitiating factors. Pakistan also confronts external threats from many directions. Across the eastern border is an unfriendly India and across its western border is a belligerent Afghanistan ruled by a US stooge who will do as commanded. Then there is this adversary garbed as an ally who is pounding Pakistan with incessant drone strikes in connivance with its political leadership and is now threatening to go for over 300 targets inside Pakistan’s territory. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s economy is on a life-support system while it is being systematically stripped of its wealth by a vast network of corrupt and complicit political mafias.

Pakistan’s ailment is discernable and there may even be doctors to write a prescription, but there is no one who would like to perform the bitter procedure. The army looks patently disinterested and the judiciary hides behind a heavy pile of cases that lie in pendency. There is no easy cure. It is a complicated operation involving numerous vital organs that need serious attention, even replacement. The system is corrupt beyond repair and those who have done the trick still have the reins in their hands.

Pakistan is precariously perched at the edge: on one side is a government that is complicit and on the other are a string of vultures with their mouths open. One false step and there is no rescue. Watershed or Waterloo? Pakistan’s plunge can only be stopped through a display of raw courage. It is time for people to stand up for their country that may not have given them anything, but that remains their only source of hope and inspiration.

The writer is a political analyst and an adviser to the PTI.

====

Pakistan: U.S. Seeks Scapegoat For Failed Afghan Policy

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=20119\29\story_29-9-2011_pg11_8

Daily Times
September 29, 2011

‘US looking for scapegoat for their failed Afghan policy’

ISLAMABAD: Pak-China Institute Chairman Mushahid Hussain Sayed, on Wednesday, said the Americans were looking for a scapegoat for their flawed and failed policy on Afghanistan.

“We should be grateful to the US administration as their blame-game and baseless accusations have united all Pakistanis. This unity and resolve by Pakistanis is reflected in today’s All-Parties Conference (APC),” said Mushahid while addressing the participants of the book-launching ceremony of Yan Lijin, a distinguished Chinese scholar among modern Chinese entrepreneurs and philosophers.

The launching ceremony of the book titled “Harmony”, held under the aegis of Pak-China Institute, was also addressed by Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir, former foreign secretary Akram Zaki, former ISI chief and chairman joint chiefs of staff committee General (retd) Ihsanul Haq and Yan Lijin.

====

NATO Acknowledges First Strike Interceptor Missile Plans

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aerospacedaily&id=news/asd/2011/09/29/03.xml&headline=Guidance%20Needed%20For%20NATO%20Missile%20Defense%20Ops

Aviation Week
September 29, 2011

Guidance Needed For NATO Missile Defense Ops
By Amy Butler

-An actual flight test pitting a German Patriot terminal defense battery against a short-range missile target is scheduled for November. During the trial, which will take place in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a U.S. Aegis cruiser will provide target tracking.
-”Many nations have capabilities that would allow us to go in and strike a missile site before it launches an attack, if NATO ever made that decision.”

NATO missile defense officials are awaiting approval of a plan to lay out guidance for unified alliance missile defense in advance of a key interim operational capability declaration for the system slated for May.

The North Atlantic Council is reviewing this plan, which includes weapons release authority, contingency response, rules of engagement and weapons control status guidelines, says U.S. Air Force Gen. Mark Welsh, who oversees American air forces in Europe. He says approval is needed by December to conduct proper testing in advance of the May milestone. Welsh is confident that with the North Atlantic Council’s approval, the interim operational capability goal is achievable.

This interim capability encompasses the exchange of data between the disparate command-and-control systems operated by NATO and the U.S.

“We have done data transfer of all types. We have worked email — which sounds minor but isn’t — [but] we have not done active voice testing yet across the system. That is the next set along with the [Internet] chat,” Welsh tells Aviation Week. “We are very close to being able to transfer an air tasking order and an airspace coordination order for missile defense across this system.”

This coordination order provides guidance to forces on which systems and shooters operate in which airspace areas; it also outlines which terminal engagement systems are responsible for acting in the event of an attack.

Welsh acknowledges that the interim milestone planned for May is one of many steps needed to stand up a NATO missile defense in Europe. “We are at step zero right now trying to build this; the first step is connectivity…We still have to prove that,” Welsh says. “The next step is once we do have that, we will have a very small capability to actually intercept and destroy an incoming missile.”

Declaration of an initial operational capability was originally planned for 2014-15, with full operational capability to follow in 2018. The general acknowledges these dates are up for debate now at NATO. But “we are not far off” that plan, he says.

An actual flight test pitting a German Patriot terminal defense battery against a short-range missile target is scheduled for November. During the trial, which will take place in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, a U.S. Aegis cruiser will provide target tracking.

[Welsh] outlines four “pillars” for missile defense: active defense (intercepting a missile); passive defense (warnings to populations and consequence management); offensive operations (including preventing a launch and/or striking a launch site); and command and control.

“There are lots of things they can do if they would look at things with a little bit broader scope than they have,” Welsh says. “Many of the nations can contribute in [various] ways, for example, in offensive operations. Many nations have capabilities that would allow us to go in and strike a missile site before it launches an attack, if NATO ever made that decision.”

====

U.S. ABM Options: Destabilizing Pre-Emptive Strike, Retaliation, Interception

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/opinion/28iht-edlet28.html

New York Times
September 29, 2011

Letters to the International Herald Tribune

In Defense of U.S. Missile Defense

Regarding “The delusion of missile defense” (Views, Sept. 21), Yousaf Butt claims, erroneously, that the U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense System depends on “essentially rigged tests, where the intercept team knew the precise timing and trajectory of the incoming missile.”

He ignores the fact that such tests must occur within a certain “window” due to air and sea traffic. In recent tests launch crews did not know when the target missile was to be launched, although they knew they were in a “period of interest.”

In a real world situation they would also know the “period of interest,” and, due to the physics of ballistic missiles, the trajectory of the target. Since 2001 the missile defense system has had an 83 percent success rate.

Moreover, despite what Mr. Butt implies, it would not be simple for our enemies to launch decoys. Even in recent test failures, the missile system’s kill vehicles accurately locked onto enemy warheads amid decoys, countermeasures and debris.

Should a missile be pointed toward the United States, the options are to inflict a destabilizing pre-emptive strike, retaliate, or intercept an attack with our Ballistic Missile Defense System.

Lt. Gen. Henry A. Obering III (ret.), Rebeccah Heinrichs, Washington General Obering is the former director of the Missile Defense Agency. Ms. Heinrichs is an adjunct fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

====

Georgia Prepared To Host U.S.-NATO Interceptor Missile Radar

http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20110929_3752.php

Global Security Newswire
September 29, 2011

Georgia Prepared to House U.S. Missile Defense Radar

Georgia is prepared to host a long-range U.S. radar system on its soil as part of NATO plans to establish a European missile defense system, the nation’s president said in an interview with Newsweek published on Monday (see GSN, Feb. 4).

The Caucasus nation is not a member of the Western alliance but it has close military ties with the United States.

President Mikhail Saakashvili said his government would be agreeable to providing information collected by the early warning X-band system with any nation, including Israel.

The Obama administration earlier this month struck a deal to deploy an X-band radar in Turkey as part of allied efforts to counter a potential ballistic missile attack from the Middle East. That arrangement, however, has not sat well with a number of senators, who have requested White House assurances that data collected by the system would be quickly shared with Israel.

Separately, Russian Ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin was expected on Wednesday to air complaints to the Russia-NATO council on alliance missile defense plans, Interfax reported.

Rogozin said NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen would use the meeting to “outline NATO’s vision of the course of missile defense negotiations between Russia and the U.S., as well as between Russia and the alliance.”

The diplomat who represents the Kremlin in missile defense negotiations with NATO said he would therefore “express certain complaints in relation to our partners that emerged during recent talks.”

Russia is also upset with the Obama administration for moving to implement its program for European missile defense while negotiations are ongoing.

Meanwhile, NATO intends to pay $3.4 million to a private consortium to spell out initial actions for a program to broaden the alliance’s existing battlefield antimissile capabilities into a system capable of protecting both military troops and civilians across the continent, Aviation Week reported .

“The results will then be taken forward for implementation in the NATO command and control network to broaden the capabilities of the NATO commander well beyond those demonstrated recently in missile defense testing between the United States and NATO elements last month,” the alliance said in a statement issued last week.

The consortium consists of Science Applications International of Virginia, TNO of the Netherlands, Qinetiq of the United Kingdom, Selex SI of Italy, EADS Astrium of France and IABG of Germany.

====

Tense Atmosphere At NATO-Russia Talks On Missile Shield

http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?pg=6&id=276611

Interfax
September 29, 2011

Russia to insist U.S., NATO take realistic approach to missile threats – envoy to NATO

BRUSSELS: Problems of negotiations on missile defense aspects were discussed in a tense atmosphere at an ambassadorial meeting of the Russia-NATO Council on Wednesday, Russian permanent envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin told Interfax.

“I presented findings by American researchers from the University of Massachusetts, which confirm the Russian Federation’s concerns that the U.S. plans of deploying its missile defense group in the northern seas and on Polish territory on the third and fourth stages will pose a real threat to the Russian strategic nuclear forces,” he said.

“If our NATO partners do not believe our Russian researchers and experts, the Defense Ministry and the Foreign Ministry, then they should at least listen to their own experts. They virtually have nothing to parry such information,” Rogozin said.

Russia will continue “to use authority, opportunities, and goodwill of our partners, researchers from Europe and the U.S., to ensure that the United States and those who support it in NATO regarding the missile defense deployment plans in Europe take an appropriate approach, which presumes that, if there are missile threats, then a system opposing them should be absolutely proportional to these risks,” he said.

“And when all plans are being sewn together and all agreements are being signed already now, including with Warsaw, on deploying U.S. missile defense elements right near Russia’s northwestern borders on the pretext of the so-called much talked-about Iranian missile threat, there should be no illusions that Russia will silently swallow such propagandistic moves. We won’t swallow this, and if we don’t obtain coherent reaction from our partners in the negotiations, we will have to resort to the best guarantee of which Czar Alexander III said calling the army and the navy Russia’s only allies,” Rogozin said.

====

Netherlands To Join NATO Interceptor Missile System

http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110928/167228879.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 28, 2011

Netherlands to join NATO missile defense program

The Netherlands will contribute to the NATO missile shield to protect Europe against missile attacks from countries such as Iran, the NRC Handelsblad newspaper said.

The Defense Ministry has approved a 250 million euro program to modernize the air-defense radar system and frigates for the sea-based defense system, the paper said.

The system will allow missiles to be spotted and tracked, NATO officials say.

====

NATO Implements Second Layer Of Continental Missile Shield

http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/news-brief-cover/1000091-second-anti-missile-shield-europe

NRC Handelsblad
September 27, 2011

Second anti-missile shield in Europe

“The Netherlands is contributing towards a missile shield,” announces NRC Handelsblad. On September 26, the country’s minister of defence announced the installation of the Smart-L radar system on the Netherlands’ four frigates and in its air defence command. These systems are part of NATO’s ALTBMD (Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence), intended to protect the territory of Europe from incoming hostile missiles.

The range of the ultra-modern systems is very high: two frigates, one in the Baltic Sea and one in the Mediterranean, would be enough to cover all of Europe’s airspace. But the project has a price: for the Netherlands, 250 million euros, which be set off against “savings for the ministry of one billion euros” writes the daily.

The Netherlands is “the first European country in NATO to contribute significantly” to NATO’s missile shield over the continent, which is independent of the shield that the United States has installed in Romania, Poland and Turkey.

====

U.S.-Led Team Wins European Theater Interceptor Missile Contract

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/09/28/04.xml&headline=U.S.-Led%20Team%20Wins%20NATO%20Missile%20Shield%20Work

Aviation Week
September 28, 2011

U.S.-Led Team Wins NATO Missile Shield Work
By Amy Svitak

PARIS: NATO has awarded a contract worth €2.5 million ($3.36 million) to a U.S.-led industry team to define the first steps of a plan that would expand NATO’s theater missile defense system to form a broader shield over the alliance’s territory and population in Europe, as well as for deployed forces.

The industry team, led by McLean, Va.-based Science Applications International Corp., comprises EADS Astrium of France, IABG of Germany, Selex SI of Italy, TNO of the Netherlands, U.K.-based Qinetiq and the British arm of Raytheon. Work under the yearlong effort is to be performed at the NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency in The Hague.

“The results will then be taken forward for implementation in the NATO command and control network to broaden the capabilities of the NATO commander well beyond those demonstrated recently in missile defense testing between the United States and NATO elements last month,” the international organization said in a Sept. 20 statement.

The NATO contract follows a November 2010 decision at the Lisbon Summit to provide the alliance with an additional layer of capability to protect Europe.

Astrium Space Transportation, the prime contractor for France’s missile defense program, has already proposed a plan to validate the underlying technology for a €1 billion missile defense system dubbed Exoguard. The unsolicited proposal aims to achieve the flight test of an in-space interceptor around mid-decade at a cost of €225 million.

====

Netherlands Extends Libya War Mission

http://www.rnw.nl/africa/bulletin/dutch-mps-extend-nato-libya-mission

Radio Netherlands
September 28, 2011

Dutch MPs to extend NATO Libya mission

A large majority of Dutch MPs has voted in favour of extending the NATO mission in Libya by another three months. Six F-16 fighter planes, a mine sweeper and more than 200 Dutch troops have participated in the mission since it began at the end of March. Dutch military personnel have also flown in AWACS radar planes.

The minority VVD and Christian Democrat (CDA) coalition decision was supported by the Labour Party (PvdA) Green Left, Christian Union and SGP in parliament. The government’s support party the Freedom Party and opposition party the Socialist Party (SP) opposed extending the military operation.

The Christian Democrats said this extension had to be the last one. But Foreign Minister Uri Rosenthal said it would be a bad sign to indicate at this stage that the mission could not be extended a third time.

The SP said the objective of the mission had been continually stretched. MP Harry van Bommel said NATO has turned into an air force for Libya’s new leaders…

There was criticism in parliament that MPs had only been informed by letter about the decision to extend the mission one day ahead of the previous mandate expiring…

====

40 Aircraft: Attack Helicopter In Scotland Ahead Of Major NATO Exercise

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-15091998

BBC News
September 28, 2011

Chinook low flying ahead of Exercise Joint Warrior

Military helicopter crews have been training in low flying over the Highlands ahead of a major UK-led Nato exercise.

A Chinook has been flying low over Loch Ness, Inverness and Ullapool as part of what the Ministry of Defence (MoD) called a medium scale exercise.

The training has been held ahead of Exercise Joint Warrior, which will take place from 3-17 October.

Joint Warrior is held twice a year, with the first staged in spring.

According to an MoD website, the sea, air and land training will mostly take place in the Highlands, Western Isles, the Borders and north east England.

The public have been told to expect large formations of fast jets.

Up to 40 Nato aircraft may take part in training simultaneously, the MoD said.

====

NATO Formalizes Complete Absorption Of Bulgaria

http://www.defpro.com/news/details/28271/?SID=be757f60109e5d96226db9e96694b3fe

Defence Professionals
September 28, 2011

Bulgaria and NATO Sign a Declaration for Concluding Integration Program into NATO

On September 27th, General Simeon Simeonov, Chief of Defence of the Republic of Bulgaria, and Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, USN, Commander, Allied Joint Force Command Naples, signed a Declaration for concluding the Program for Integration of BU Armed Forces into NATO.

“The Declaration we signed today is a confirmation that Bulgaria has accomplished the Integration Plan objectives. The Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria have gone through a period of comprehensive transformation. We have brought our regulations and procedures in line with those of NATO,” Defence Chief General Simeon Simeonov said in his address. He emphasized that the experience gathered by the Bulgarian Army will be of great importance to future joint activities and cooperation.

“The Bulgarian declared units have gone through intensive training in order to achieve interoperability with NATO forces. The certification and affirmation process has proved their readiness to participate in NATO operations. During the last several years the Bulgarian Armed Forces managed to create a pool of sufficient number of evaluators capable of conducting both national certification and NATO affirmation. Their experience is of great importance to our efforts to enhance the training of the Bulgarian declared units and make it more efficient and effective. With these units, as part of a single set of forces, Bulgaria has been successfully participating in NATO, UN and EU operations,” General Simeonov added.

In turn, Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, USN, Commander, Allied Joint Force Command Naples, said, “You have demonstrated the requisite operational capabilities necessary for inclusion in the NATO Force Structure and Integrated Air Defense System. We are honored to sign the “Declaration on the Bulgarian Armed Forces’ Integration into NATO”,” emphasized Admiral Locklear. “We are confident that the affirmation of Bulgarian units and their addition to the NATO Pool of Forces will increase the Alliance’s operational capability and significantly contribute to regional and global security,” Admiral Locklear pointed out.

Earlier today, Defence Minister Anu Anguelov met with Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, USN, Commander, Allied Joint Force Command Naples. Minister Anguelov underlined that the accomplishment of the objectives of integration and interoperability of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria into NATO is a result of the good interaction we have had for many years now. He introduced his guest to the documents, recently adopted by the National Assembly: the new National Defence Strategy, the White Paper on Defence, as well as with the Plan for the Development of the Armed Forces, elaborated on the basis of the Defence Strategy and the White Paper. Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III thanked our country for the participation of the Bulgarian military in ISAF, the deployment of the Drazki frigate to support the embargo of Libya, and the conduct of the annual Exercise BREEZE, which has improved interoperability among NATO units in the Black Sea.

Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, USN, Commander, Allied Joint Force Command Naples was received earlier today with full military honors at the Monument of the Unknown Soldier.

====

U.S. Marks 19th Anniversary Of Restructuring Bulgarian Military For NATO

http://www.sofiaecho.com/2011/09/28/1164601_us-security-assistance-programme-marks-19th-anniversary

Sofia Echo
September 28, 2011

US security assistance programme marks 19th anniversary

The Office of Defence Cooperation at the US embassy in Sofia marked the 19th anniversary of its security assistance programmes with Bulgaria with a ceremony and reception hosted by ambassador James Warlick at the US embassy on September 27 2011.

The security assistance programmes consist of the Foreign Military Financing (FMF) programme and the Combined Education and Training (CETP) programme, which incorporates the International Military Education and Training (IMET) Program, the Counter terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP), specialised training via FMF, all of which involve English-language training, as well as academics and training at the George C. Marshall Center in Garmisch, Germany. All of these programmes are made possible through U.S. Security Assistance grant funding as mandated by the US congress.

Since 1992, the Office of Defence Cooperation has spent more than 22 million dollars to train more than 1400 Bulgarian military officers, Ministry of Defence civilians and Non-Commissioned Officers (NCO) who have benefited from educational programmes and training offered under the security assistance programme.

Over the same period, Bulgaria has been allocated approximately 143 million dollars under the Foreign Military Financing (FMF) programme to assist with the modernisation of its armed forces, as well as to enhance interoperability within Nato and with US forces.

In recognition of the programme’s success, ambassador Warlick welcomed many of the Bulgarian graduates of the education and training programmes, as well as other defence officials, including SSG Deyan Madin of the 61st Mechanized Brigade in Karlovo, an honour graduate of the Warrior Leaders Course held at the US 7th Army NCO Academy in Grafenwoehr, Germany.

====

Florida: Pentagon Trains Balkans, Caucasus, Eastern European Navies

http://jacksonville.com/military/jax-air-news/2011-09-28/story/ukrainian-officers-learn-about-nas-jax-operations

Florida Times-Union
September 28, 2011

Ukrainian officers learn about NAS Jax operations
By Kaylee LaRocque
NAS Jax Deputy PAO

-Th[e] program provides cooperative relationships with maritime nations and is key to regional stability and security. MPP Det 513 works directly with Commander, 6th Fleet Headquarters in Naples, Italy coordinating, engaging and executing military to military events with Eastern European countries. These countries include: Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Turkey, Poland and the Ukraine.

Four Ukrainian naval officers and their civilian interpreter visited NAS Jacksonville Sept. 18-23 to gain insight into aviation survival and safety, search and rescue (SAR) capabilities, and squadron operations.

The group began day one with a visit to the NAS Jax Air Traffic Control Tower where they witnessed air traffic controllers directing pilots using the airfield and learned about daily operations in the tower and radar room.

The afternoon was spent visiting Hangar 1000 to learn about fleet logistics squadron missions and responsibilities at VR-62 and VR-58.

The group also visited VP-30 to learn how patrol squadron pilots are trained for the fleet…and HSM-74 and HSL-42 to talk with pilots about the capabilities and mission of the SH-60B Seahawk and the new MH-60R Romeo helicopters.

On the final day of the visit, the Ukrainian officers spent several hours “flying” the Romeo helicopter flight simulator.

The visit was sponsored through the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe, Commander 6th Fleet, Maritime Partnership Program (CNE-C6F MPP) and coordinated by Naval Reserve officers from CNE-C6F MPP Detachment 513 based at Navy Operations Support Center (NOSC) Great Lakes, Ill.

This program provides cooperative relationships with maritime nations and is key to regional stability and security. MPP Det 513 works directly with Commander, 6th Fleet Headquarters in Naples, Italy coordinating, engaging and executing military to military events with Eastern European countries. These countries include: Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Turkey, Poland and the Ukraine.

“The Ukrainian and U.S. Navies jointly participate in exercises and operations so this trip will help enhance our capabilities during these international evolutions. By learning about search and rescue procedures, it will allow our military to better assist during emergency situations for our aviators and those participating in joint operations,” said [Capt. Yurii Zabolotskyi, deputy navigator, Ukraine Aviation Squadron, Naval Aviation Brigade].

CNE-C6F MPP Det 513 is comprised of approximately 60 reservists with a variety of skill sets. Some of the unit’s personnel live and work in Europe and speak foreign languages which benefits the CNEP allowing U.S. and foreign military members better interaction and success in their missions.

====

Poland Slams Belarus For Foreign Minister’s No-Show At Eastern Partnership Summit

http://en.rian.ru/world/20110929/167247458.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 29, 2011

Poland condemns Belarus minister no-show at Eastern Partnership summit

[The Eastern Partnership program, complemented by a European Union initiative aimed at the former Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan - largely intended to replace Russian oil and gas supplies to the European Union, the world's second-largest energy consumer - will destroy the Commonwealth of Independent States, leaving Russia isolated in the so-called Former Soviet Space.]

WARSAW: Poland has criticized the refusal by the Belarusian foreign minister to attend an Eastern Partnership summit in Warsaw.

Warsaw is hosting a two-day summit (September 29-30) on the Eastern Partnership, an initiative to bring the EU’s eastern neighbors closer to the 27-nation bloc.

Belarusian Foreign Minister Sergei Martynov declined the invitation. The country will be represented at the summit by the Belarusian ambassador to Warsaw.

Belarus’ decision is yet another step toward the country’s “self imposed isolation,” Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said on Thursday.
The Eastern Partnership program, initiated by Poland and Sweden in 2008, seeks to bring the six post-Soviet countries of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine closer to the democratic and economic workings of the EU.

The summit is expected to produce a declaration on the “European aspirations” of the EU’s partners in the program.

—————————————————————————-

http://en.trend.az/regions/world/europe/1938440.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

Poland sees EU path for democratic states in East

Poland’s foreign minister says European Union membership could become more realistic for nations on the bloc’s eastern periphery in the next decade if they become “a little bit like Norway or Switzerland.”

Radek Sikorski spoke Thursday ahead of a summit on the Eastern Partnership, an initiative aimed at deepening EU integration with Georgia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Armenia and Azerbaijan, AP reported.

Sikorski said EU membership “at this point is distant” for the countries. But he urged them to adopt Western-style laws and democratic standards, saying that was their only hope for eventual membership, Kyiv Post reported.

He said, “if you become legally speaking and commercially speaking a little bit like Norway or Switzerland, then things become possible. Of course if you don’t, you won’t (join).”

—————————————————————————

http://en.trend.az/news/politics/1938047.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

Georgian President to attend the “Eastern Partnership” summit
N. Kirtskhalia

Tbilisi: Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili will participate in the summit of the “Eastern Partnership” which will be held September 29-30 in Warsaw. As reported to Trend with reference to the Georgian presidential administration, Saakashvili is already in Warsaw.

The leaders of the program participants – Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Ukraine, and EU leaders and the leaders of several EU countries will attend the summit of the “Eastern Partnership”.

The summit will begin tonight at 19.00, and a briefing will be given summit on September 30.

As stated by the president’s spokesman Manana Manjgaladze, Saakashvili will hold several bilateral meetings, including with the High Commissioner for Foreign Policy Catherine Ashton, at the summit.

As Manjgaladze noted, at the summit, along with other issues topics of regional security will be discussed. According to her, it’s planned to adopt a joint communique. “We also have the opportunity to present 27 EU member states and five countries members of the “Eastern Partnership” our vision, priorities and initiatives that will make us closer to the EU”, she said.

Georgia hopes to specifically define the date of commencement of negotiations with EU on free trade.

====

Eastern Partnership: EU Targets “Frozen Conflicts,” “Color” Changes

http://en.trend.az/news/karabakh/1938031.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

Conflicts in the region are the most concerning obstacles to progress – EU
E. Aliyev

Baku: In Warsaw, the EU and its Eastern partners will be meeting in the context of strong relationships, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton has said ahead of the Eastern Partnership summit in the Polish capital on 29-30 September, reported Trend with reference to an ENPI press release.

Addressing the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Ashton said, “We are all committed to making the Warsaw Summit a success, and to giving renewed momentum to building the closest possible relations with our Eastern partners and neighbours.”

Progress has been made on mobility, the High Representative said, citing the implementation of Visa Action Plans with Ukraine and Moldova and the new Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements with Georgia that had entered into force earlier this year. The EU aims to launch negotiations on similar agreements with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus in the near future, said Ashton.

Citing the recent Review of the Neighbourhood Policy, Ashton said the EU would provide more support to civil society in the partner countries, in particular through a new Neighbourhood Civil Society Facility. She also said the EU would establish a new European Endowment for Democracy to support democratic change in the neighbourhood.

Turning to the conflicts in the region (in Nagorno Karabakh, in Transistria, in Abkhazia and South Ossetia) the High Representative said they were “perhaps the most concerning obstacles to progress.”

“We expect our Eastern partners in the region to do their utmost to make progress towards peaceful settlement,” said Ashton, adding: “Progress here will mean progress in our relationship as a whole.”

====

20 Million Tons Of Azeri, Kazakh Oil For Caspian-Baltic Pipelines

http://en.trend.az/capital/energy/1938276.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

Minister: Azerbaijan may place up to 20 million tons of oil from eastern Caspian Sea
E. Ismayilov

Baku: Azerbaijan could easily transport 20 million tons of oil from Kazakhstan and other Caspian countries in its pipelines, Azerbaijan, Industry and Energy Minister Natig Aliyev said today.

Aliyev said the Eurasian oil transportation corridor project deserves special attention.

Azerbaijan is actively involved in the construction project of the Odessa-Brody-Plock-Gdansk oil pipeline, which is a part of the corridor. SOCAR is one of the participants of the Sarmatia international pipeline company.
At present, Ukraine and Poland agree on the issues of financing the oil pipeline construction from the European Union.

Kazakh oil may be one of the sources for this route. It may be delivered to Azerbaijan through the Caspian Sea by tankers. It is necessary to build the Eskene-Kuryk pipeline in Kazakhstan to create this system, as well as the terminals on both sides of the Caspian Sea to transport oil.

====

Bryza: U.S. To Protect Caspian Energy Infrastructure

http://en.trend.az/capital/energy/1938238.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

U.S. assists Azerbaijan in protecting Caspian energy infrastructure
N. Ismayilova

Baku: The U.S. is working with the Azerbaijani government on ensuring that the Caspian energy infrastructure is protected from a wide variety of risks, U.S. Ambassador to Baku Matthew Bryza told journalists on Thursday.

He said some problems relate to natural disasters such as big storms, some relate to technological, like a major oil problem in the Gulf of Mexico and, of course, some are caused by terrorism.

“Azerbaijan and the U.S. work together to understand these risks and extend our experience in reducing risks,” Bryza underscored.

The West is interested in cooperating with Azerbaijan in energy sphere, particularly within the Southern Corridor Project.

The Southern Corridor is a priority EU energy project. It will diversify energy supply routes and resources, and increase EU energy security. The Southern Corridor includes the Nabucco gas pipeline, Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP), White Stream, and ITGI (Turkey-Greece-Italy pipeline).

====

British Energy Minister: Caspian Gas To Europe Soon As Possible

http://en.trend.az/capital/energy/1938465.html

Trend News Agency
September 29, 2011

UK energy minister: Azerbaijani gas should be supplied to Europe as soon as possible
A. Badalova

Baku: Today the transportation of the Azerbaijani gas to the European market is an urgent issue, UK Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change Charles Hendry told journalists in Baku on Thursday.

He said this issue requires a prompt solution. “The Shah Deniz field is one of the largest gas fields, and it is very important to deliver gas from this field to the European market as soon as possible,” he said.

====

West Completes Caspian Energy War Plans

http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=156126

Azeri Press Agency
September 29, 2011

US analyst: “Moscow has less and less leverage in the energy realm”
Isabel Levine

-[T]he Absheron discovery is a potentially strategically important event for European consumers. It means that there is more confirmed alternative natural gas available in the Caspian, to be developed by Western companies and piped to Western countries…[T]he EU, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan should and will likely continue negotiations on a Trans-Caspian gas option irrespective of Russian bullying. Moscow has less and less leverage in the energy realm over all three actors and gone are the days when Russian bluster could alter the course of the winds of change on the Caspian.

Washington: APA US correspondent’s interview with Alexandros Petersen, Advisor to the European Energy Security Initiative (EESI) at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, in Washington DC. An internationally recognized scholar of grand strategy and energy geopolitics, he is the author of The World Island: Eurasian Geopolitics and the Fate of the West.

- Just recently the French Total has announced discovering a major gas field in the Caspian Sea, in Azerbaijan’s sector. What could be the Absheron field’s contribution to Azerbaijan’s energy security?

- In general, the Absheron discovery is a potentially strategically important event for European consumers. It means that there is more confirmed alternative natural gas available in the Caspian, to be developed by Western companies and piped to Western countries. Azerbaijan was already the focal point of European energy security opportunities and Absheron’s development will only confirm that top spot. Although it will take a decade or so for Absheron gas to become available, this timeline probably fits well with those of the Southern Energy Corridor projects under consideration.

- A lot is being said about the Nabucco project and Azerbaijan’s role in it, but no real steps were taken, why is that? Will the discovery of Absheron improve Nabucco’s chances?

- The real question is what are the implications for the expansion of the Southern Energy Corridor. Nabucco is just one of three major projects competing to bring gas from the Caspian to European markets through the Corridor. The first of October is in fact a milestone in moving the Corridor’s vision forward, when each of the projects: IGI, Nabucco and TAP will be submitting tariff and commercial transit terms to the Shah Deniz consortium with a view towards the consortium picking a project before the end of the year. The Absheron gas field will certainly factor into these considerations – especially as it shares stakeholders with Shah Deniz – but the consortia developing the two projects are different. For now, a Southern Energy Corridor project will probably move forward based on Shah Deniz II development. The real question is about whether the next stage will be to link in Absheron gas or build a Trans-Caspian gas option – or both.

- Russia says EU’s decision to give a mandate to the European Commission to negotiate on the legal framework for a Trans-Caspian gas pipeline with Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan as third party intervention in the Caspian Sea sector. Does this sound like there could be an energy war in the Caspian Sea?

- Russia’s reaction to the EU announcement was regrettable, not only because it was antagonistic, but because it was short-sighted. There will not be an “energy war” in the Caspian any time soon, mainly because the EU, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan should and will likely continue negotiations on a Trans-Caspian gas option irrespective of Russian bullying. Moscow has less and less leverage in the energy realm over all three actors and gone are the days when Russian bluster could alter the course of the winds of change on the Caspian.

====

Categories: Uncategorized

Theocritus: May spiders spin their slender webs over weapons of war

September 29, 2011 Leave a comment

Anti-war essays, poems, short stories and literary excerpts

Theocritus
Idylls
From Number 16
Translated by Bariss Mills

And may all our towns spoiled by enemy hands
be peopled by their former citizens
again. May they work the fertile fields,
and may countless thousands of sheep fatten
in pastures and go bleating over the plain,
and may cattle coming home in herds
warn the late traveler to hurry
on his way. And may the fallow ground
be plowed at seed-time when the cicada
sings overhead in the treetops, watching
the shepherds in the sun. And may spiders
spin their slender webs over battle-weapons,
and the battle-cry be heard no more.

Categories: Uncategorized

Updates on Libyan war/Stop NATO news: September 28, 2011

September 28, 2011 3 comments

====

NATO’s Libya War: Almost 25,000 Sorties, Over 9,000 Strike Sorties

Venezuela Condemns U.S., NATO, UN Over Libya War

NATO To Remain In “Fluid” Libya Indefinitely

NATO Decision: Polish President Signs Martial Law Bill Into Law

Syria May Fall Victim To New Cycle Of Colonial Wars: Venezuela

Russia, China Oppose NATO States’ New Draft Resolution On Syria

France Threatens Military Action Against Iran

NATO Troops Attack Kosovo Serbs

Destabilizing Balkans: Russia Upset With NATO Over Kosovo

Russia Urges NATO To Abide By UN Resolution On Kosovo

NATO Troops Fire On Serbs, Seven Wounded

Serbia Breaks Off EU Talks With Kosovo To Protest Violence

53 U.S. Drone Strikes Kill 467 In Pakistan This Year

Attacking Nuclear Pakistan Won’t Be A Cakewalk

NATO Oil Tankers Torched In Balochistan

Pakistani Bar Association: Cut NATO Supply Lines

U.S. “Reviewing Aid” To Pakistan

Afghan War: NATO Loses Over 450 Soldiers This Year

New Zealand Special Forces Soldier Killed In Afghan Firefight

Afghanistan: Most Of $70 Billion In Foreign Aid Spent On Security

Top NATO Commander In Turkey For Missile Talks

Turkish Opposition Parties Oppose NATO Missile Radar Base

Baltic Sea: NATO Warships Bring “Regional Security In Pescadia”

Death Knell For CIS: Eastern Partnership Conference In Warsaw

U.S.’s Bryza Continues 17-Year Trans-Caspian Pipeline Advocacy

====

NATO’s Libya War: Almost 25,000 Sorties, Over 9,000 Strike Sorties

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_09/20110928_110928-oup-update.pdf

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 28, 2011

NATO and Libya
Allied Joint Force Command NAPLES, SHAPE, NATO HQ

Over the past 24 hours, NATO has conducted the following activities associated with Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR:

Air Operations

Since the beginning of the NATO operation (31 March 2011, 06.00GMT) a total of 24,140 sorties, including 9,010 strike sorties, have been conducted.

Sorties conducted 27 SEPTEMBER: 100

Strike sorties conducted 27 SEPTEMBER: 35

====

Venezuela Condemns U.S., NATO, UN Over Libya War

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2011-09/28/content_13808818.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 28, 2011

Venezuela slams US, NATO’s involvement in Libya

-”It’s worth wondering: what has the no-fly zone established by the Security Council resolution become?” said Moros. “How could NATO perform more than 20,000 missions against the Libyan people if there was a no-fly zone? After the Libyan Air Force was completely annihilated, the continued ‘humanitarian’ bombing shows that the west, through NATO, intends to impose their interests in North Africa, turning Libya into a colonial protectorate.”

UNITED NATIONS: Nicolas Maduro Moros, foreign minister of Venezuela on Tuesday lashed out at the involvement of the US, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the UN in recent events in Libya.

Moros’statement came as he was addressing the general debate of the UN General Assembly at its 66th session to transmit a message from Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Frias.

“Right now there is a very serious threat to global peace: a new cycle of colonial wars, which started in Libya, with the sinister goal of refreshing the capitalist global system, within a structural crisis today, but without any limit to its consumer and destructive voracity,” Moros said.

“It is necessary to remember and to recur to our immediate memory: Venezuela, alongside the member countries of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of the Americas (ALBA), was actively advocating for a peaceful and negotiated solution to the Libyan conflict,” said Moros.

The Venezuelan foreign minister said that peaceful resolution of the Libyan situation was derailed by the US and NATO and claimed that reports of attacks on the Libyan people by the Libyan Air Force were unfounded in truth.

“However, after all, the logic of war decreed by the UN Security Council and put into practice by NATO, the armed wing of the Yankee Empire, was imposed,” he said. “The logic of war having its spearhead in transnational mass media: let us bear in mind that the ‘Libyan Case’ was brought before the Security Council on the basis of intense propaganda by the western mass media, who lied about the alleged bombing of innocent civilians by the Libyan Air Force, not to mention the grotesque media setting of the Green Square of Tripoli.”

He said that a “premeditated bunch of lies” were used to justify “military regime change policy” by NATO.

“It’s worth wondering: what has the no-fly zone established by the Security Council resolution become?” said Moros. “How could NATO perform more than 20,000 missions against the Libyan people if there was a no-fly zone? After the Libyan Air Force was completely annihilated, the continued ‘humanitarian’ bombing shows that the west, through NATO, intends to impose their interests in North Africa, turning Libya into a colonial protectorate.”

Moros said that Venezuela questions the legitimacy of the arms embargo placed on Libya through Security Council resolution 1970 and strengthened by resolution 1973.

“How can we say that an arms embargo was imposed on Libya, when it was NATO itself that introduced thousands of heavy weapons to support a violent upheaval against that country’s legitimate government?” Moros said. “The embargo was, of course, meant to prevent the Libyan government from defending its sovereignty. This shows, once again, the cruel logic of international relations, where the law only applies to the weak.”

Moros called for an immediate end to the NATO bombings in Libya.

The UN, according to Moros, must reform in order to serve its purpose.
He called the current state of the international organization a “crisis,” a point he said Venezuela has made previously.

“Since then and until now, nothing has been done: the political will of the most powerful ones has prevailed,” said Moros. “Sure, the UN, as for its current functioning, docilely pledges to their interests. For us it is obvious that the UN is not improving and will not improve from the inside.”

“If its secretary-general, along with the president of the International Criminal Court (ICC), take part in an act of war, as in the case of Libya, nothing can be expected from the current structure of this organization and there is no longer time for reforms: the UN does not accept any reform whatsoever, the illness within it is deadly,” he added.

Moros criticized the Security Council, saying that a first step to re-founding the UN as a whole would be to eliminate the permanent member category and veto power from the peace and security body. He said that the General Assembly’s power must be democratically maximized and that a comprehensive review of the UN charter, with the aim of redrafting a new one, should be imposed.

====

NATO To Remain In “Fluid” Libya Indefinitely

http://www.defense.gov/News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=65463

U.S. Department of Defense
American Forces Press Service
September 27, 2011

Libya Operations Remain Fluid, NATO Official Says
By Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone C. Marshall Jr.

WASHINGTON: NATO’s decision to extend the alliance’s mission in Libya shows its work there is not yet done, a NATO spokeswoman said today.

NATO’s North Atlantic Council extended Operation Unified Protector by 90 days during a meeting in New York last week that coincided with a meeting of the U.N. General Assembly.

“In New York, the message was clear: a new day is dawning for Libya, and the international community is rallying around the new Libya,” Oana Lungescu told reporters during a briefing at the alliance’s headquarters in Brussels.

Lungescu reiterated NATO’s commitment…

“The situation remains fluid. And while threats persist, NATO will continue…”

Col. Roland Lavoie of the Canadian air force, military spokesman for Operation Unified Protector, discussed operations against remaining forces in the country loyal to Moammar Gadhafi.

“Recent developments in Surt and Bani Walid have been our main area of attention over the last few days,” he said…

Lavoie stressed that NATO will continue to monitor ground conditions…

“Operation Unified Protector is not over yet,” he said…

====

NATO Decision: Polish President Signs Martial Law Bill Into Law

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-09/27/c_131163568.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 27, 2011

Polish president signs bill on state of emergency into law

WARSAW: Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski Tuesday signed into law a bill on the introduction of martial law, states of emergency and disaster in case of cyber threats, local media reported.

Under the new law, the president, at the motion of the government, can introduce one of the three exceptional states in case of hostile actions in cyberspace.

“This is a law which has been awaited by the Polish security system and NATO; it actually is the implementation of a NATO decision from its Lisbon summit,” said Komorowski after signing the law.

The Presidential National Security Bureau (BBN) head Stanislaw Koziej told local media that national security system should include hackers’ attacks and intentional or unintentional IT systems failure.

====

Syria May Fall Victim To New Cycle Of Colonial Wars: Venezuela

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=39844&Cr=syria&Cr1=

UN News Centre
September 28, 2011

Syria may fall victim to ‘new cycle of colonial wars’ – UN debate hears

-“Were it not for some permanent members showing a firm stance, everything would be defined within the Security Council to authorize shooting missiles and sending bombardiers against Syria.”

Syria runs the risk of falling victim to the same “new cycle of colonial wars” that was imposed on Libya, Venezuela told the General Assembly’s annual general debate today.

In a message delivered by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolás Maduro Moros, President Hugo Chávez Frías said that the real reason for military intervention in Libya this year was to take over its wealth, and that the same imperialist tactics are being exercised in Syria.

“It is intolerable that the powers of the world intend to claim for themselves the right to direct the lawful rulers to resign immediately. This was the case in Libya and they want to proceed in the same way in Syria,” he said.

Mr. Chávez called for the immediate cessation of the bombing operation in Libya, and spoke strongly against any form of intervention in Syria.

“The ‘Libyan Case’ was brought before the Security Council on the basis of an intense propaganda by the Western mass media, who lied about the alleged bombing of innocent civilians by the Libyan air force, not to mention the grotesque media setting of the Green Square of Tripoli,” he said.

“After the Libyan air force was completely annihilated, the continued ‘humanitarian’ bombing shows that the West, through North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), intends to impose their interests in North Africa, turning Libya into a colonial protectorate,” he added.

Mr. Chávez stressed that the same should not happen in Syria, and that military intervention should not be an option for the country.

“Only the Syrian people can solve their problems and decide their fate in the light of the right to self-determination of the peoples, an inalienable right in all respects,” he said.

“Were it not for some permanent members showing a firm stance, everything would be defined within the Security Council to authorize shooting missiles and sending bombardiers against Syria,” he added.

====

Russia, China Oppose NATO States’ New Draft Resolution On Syria

http://en.rian.ru/world/20110928/167223881.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 28, 2011

Russia against new draft resolution on Syria – source

United Nations: Russia is against a new draft resolution on Syria put forward by Britain, France, Germany and Portugal and backed by the United States, a diplomatic source told RIA Novosti.

“Articles on sanctions included in the new draft cannot satisfy Russia,” he said.

The scaled-down UN draft resolution sent to UN Security Council members threatens the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad with sanctions only if violence against protesters does not end.

The 15-nation Security Council “expresses its determination, in the event that Syria has not complied with this resolution, to adopt targeted measures, including sanctions,” the document reads. An earlier draft resolution called for sanctions against Assad, his family and his aides.

The new draft resolution was put forward after Russia and China threatened to veto any sanctions against the Syrian authorities.

Representatives of the UN Security Council member countries are expected to discuss the document later in the day, another source said.

Last week, the European Union stiffened its sanctions against Syria to include a ban on investment in the country’s oil industry as well as asset freezes and travel bans for a number of senior Syrian officials. Sanctions have also been imposed on a Syrian TV network and a telecom firm over their suspected links to the government.

====

France Threatens Military Action Against Iran

http://rt.com/news/military-strike-iran-france-567/

RT
September 28, 2011

France threatens military action against Iran

The French envoy to the UN has warned Iran that it risks a military strike if it continues pursuing its nuclear program.

“If we don’t succeed today to reach a negotiation with the Iranians, there is a strong risk of military action,” Ambassador Gerard Araud said on Tuesday during a panel discussion at the UN’s New York headquarters,  AFP reported.

The strike, he said, “would be a very complicated operation. It would have disastrous consequences in the region…all the Arab countries are extremely worried about what is happening.”

Last Sunday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called on Iran to “freeze the production of centrifuges,” saying that such a step would prevent fresh sanctions against it.

“In response we will abstain from imposing more sanctions, both at the UN Security Council and unilaterally,” the diplomat said in a CNN interview.

On Tuesday, Mr. Lavrov stressed the need to find a diplomatic solution to the issue.

“We don’t see any alternative to a political and diplomatic solution and taking concrete steps towards renewing of talks,” he said in an address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

Earlier this month, the UN nuclear watchdog published a report on developments after Teheran allowed an inspector to enter some of its nuclear facilities which had previously been closed. Moscow believes that Iran’s latest moves show positive changes in its attitude to the UN’s control of its nuclear program, which the international community should encourage.

On Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Salehi called on the European Union to resume nuclear talks with Tehran.

“There have been new developments with regard to Iran’s nuclear issue and also other issues,” Salehi said in a meeting with EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

Earlier this month, former US Vice President Dick Cheney said he believed Israel would attack Iran to prevent it from achieving nuclear weapons capacity.

Cheney told Newsmax TV that “Iran represents an existential threat and [the Israelis] will do whatever they have to do to guarantee their survival and their security.”

====

NATO Troops Attack Kosovo Serbs

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/28/56888906.html

Voice of Russia/Itar-Tass
September 28, 2011

KFOR attacks Kosovo Serbs

Representatives of the Serbian community in Macedonia are indignant at the groundless attack of the KFOR international security force in Kosovo against Kosovo Serbs, Ivan Stoilkovic, leader of the Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia, declared to the ITAR-TASS news agency on Wednesday.

“According to its status, KFOR is to remain neutral and protect citizens rather than get into conflicts with them,” he pointed out. “There can be no excuse for the outrageous behaviour of KFOR servicemen who tried to cold-bloodedly kill people only for being Serbian.”

The clash occurred at the security check-point on the administrative border between Serbia and the self-proclaimed republic. The Serbs were protesting against the Kosovo administration establishing control over the security check-point.

====

Destabilizing Balkans: Russia Upset With NATO Over Kosovo

http://en.ria.ru/russia/20110928/167220907.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 28, 2011

Russia ‘disappointed’ with NATO’s reluctance to discuss Kosovo

BRUSSELS: Russia is upset by NATO’s unwillingness to discuss the situation in Kosovo at NATO-Russia Council sessions, Russia’s NATO envoy said on Wednesday.

“Russia’s permanent mission to NATO is disappointed with the reluctance of its partners to discuss the situation in Kosovo at the NATO-Russia Council,” Dmitry Rogozin said in an interview with RIA Novosti.

Moscow regards the Kosovo problem as a “serious destabilizing factor in the Balkans situation, which directly affects European security,” he said.

Four NATO troops and six Serb protesters were wounded in fresh violence on the disputed Serbia-Kosovo border on Tuesday.

====

Russia Urges NATO To Abide By UN Resolution On Kosovo

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/27/56836385.html

Voice of Russia/Russian Information Agency Novosti
Septembre 27, 2011

Lavrov urges compliance with UN resolution on Kosovo

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has called on the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR) to strictly abide by UN Security Council resolution 1244.

Meeting his Serbian counterpart Vuk Jeremic in New York, Mr. Lavrov cautioned against moves fraught with further destabilization on the administrative border between Serbia and Kosovo.

Tension broke out in the middle of this month after the ethnic Albanian authorities of Kosovo deployed their customs and police officers at the Jarinje and Brnjak border crossings with the assistance of KFOR servicemen despite fierce protests from local Serbs.

====

NATO Troops Fire On Serbs, Seven Wounded

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=09&dd=27&nav_id=76572

Beta News Agency/Tanjug News Agency/B92
September 27, 2011

KFOR fires at Serbs, seven injured


KFOR troops at the Jarinje checkpoint (Tanjug)

KOSOVSKA MITROVICA: Kosovska Mitrovica Health Center Director Milan Jakovljević says seven persons who were injured at the Jarinje checkpoint earlier today have been hospitalized.

According to him, six persons sustained serious injuries from live rounds and one person has been taken to the ophthalmology ward due to eye problems caused by tear gas.

“Nobody is in a life-threatening condition so far,” Jakovljević stressed.

Jakovljević added that shots had also been fired at the ambulance but that the medical team that had been giving medical attention to the injured Serbs had not been injured.

KFOR troops threw flash bombs and tear gas and fired rubber bullets at local Serbs who gathered at the Jarinje checkpoint around 13:00 CET.

U.S. KFOR troops used tear gas early on Tuesday to disperse Serbs and remove a barricade from an alternative road that leads from Jarinje to central Serbia.

Local Serbs, who spent the night at the barricades, told Beta news agency earlier on Tuesday that the troops had been brutal, that they had used tear gas and that they tied up young men who had been present.

One of them received medical attention at the Raška hospital. Four Serbs have been arrested and later released. The U.S. troops threaten to shoot anyone who comes close to the barbed wire at the Jarinje administrative checkpoint.

KFOR troops removed the barricades made of dirt and gravel.

They have also announced that starting from Tuesday morning they will arrest anyone who uses the alternative road around Jarinje. German troops arrested and soon after released two people at the alternative road around 7:00 CET on Tuesday.

An incident broke out around 10:30 CET when several citizens threw rocks at KFOR troops who responded by using tear gas. The clash quickly ended when Leposavić Mayor Branko Ninić called on the citizens to remain calm and to peacefully fight for their legitimate requests.

The night was peaceful at the other barricades in northern Kosovo.

KFOR removed a sand barricade from Jarinje last night, but Serbs who came to the administrative checkpoint in great numbers managed to set up a new barricade on the main road leading to Rudnica and kept watch at an alternative road that connects this part of Kosovo with central Serbia.

====

Serbia Breaks Off EU Talks With Kosovo To Protest Violence

http://en.trend.az/regions/world/europe/1937542.html

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
September 28, 2011

Belgrade breaks off talks with Kosovo to protest violence

Serbia on Tuesday broke off talks held with Kosovo under European Union auspices to protest an operation by NATO peacekeepers in Kosovo against Serbs blocking a contested border, DPA reported.

“For the time being, the priority is the situation at border crossings, and for us no other topic exists,” Serbia’s chief negotiator, Borko Stefanovic, was quoted by Belgrade media as saying.

“I think in this situation it is unrealistic to talk about energy, telecommunications and regional initiatives,” he said in Brussels, where he was meeting with EU mediator Robert Cooper and US representative Philip Reeker.

The seventh round since March of EU-facilitated talks between Serbia and Kosovo to resolve issues stemming from Kosovo’s secession were scheduled without the disputed border crossings on the agenda.

The EU has set progress in the talks as a crucial condition for Serbia to be formally recognized as an EU membership candidate already this year. Belgrade officials had hoped that a date for the start of accession talks would be set at the same time.

The negotiations were already interrupted in July, when Serbia refused to lift a de-facto trade embargo on Kosovo goods.

That escalated into a trade war and tensions in northern Kosovo, when Pristina attempted to take control of border crossings in the north, one of few areas where Serbs outnumber ethnic Albanians.

Tensions in the area again erupted into violence on Tuesday, when NATO peacekeepers (KFOR) moved to dismantle roadblocks that the Serbs erected in their enclave in protest at their loss of control over the borders in mid-September.

KFOR sealed several “alternate” routes, which the Serbs had opened toward Serbia proper to circumvent controls at the official border crossings.

At least four peacekeepers and seven demonstrators were injured in clashes.

====

53 U.S. Drone Strikes Kill 467 In Pakistan This Year

http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=156006

Azeri Press Agency
September 28, 2011

4 killed in U.S. drone strike in NW Pakistan

                      
Baku: At least four suspected militants were killed and another two injured in a U.S. drone strike launched Tuesday night in Pakistan’s northwest tribal area of South Waziristan, reported local media ARY, APA reports.

According to the local media reports, two missiles were fired by a U.S. drone at a house suspected of being a militant’s hideout at the Azam Warsak area of South Waziristan which borders Afghanistan.

Details about the identities of the killed in the strike are not immediately available.

Tuesday night’s U.S. drone strike is the 53rd of its kind (counted on a daily basis) in Pakistan in 2011. To date, a total of 467 people…have reportedly been killed in such strikes.

====

Attacking Nuclear Pakistan Won’t Be A Cakewalk

http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Columns/28-Sep-2011/Pakistan-served-Miranda

The Nation
September 28, 2011

Pakistan served Miranda
By S.M. Hali

-The countries that plan wars in order to capture resources, conquer territories, or advance their strategic interests or hegemonic designs never lack noble-sounding pretexts: Self-defence, defending civilisation, rescuing threatened national minorities, and so on.
-The US, therefore, should take cognisance that attacking Pakistan won’t be a cakewalk. It is a nuclear-equipped and battle hardened country, which will defend itself or go down fighting.

The US administration has virtually read out the Miranda warning to Pakistan. Miranda is the formal warning given by the police in the United States to criminal suspects in a custodial situation before they are interrogated to make the accused aware of and remind him of his constitutional rights.

Admiral Mike Mullen, Leon Panetta and Jay Carney have virtually issued Miranda warnings to Pakistan accusing it of supporting attacks by the Haqqani network on US targets in Afghanistan, including the September 13 assault on the American Embassy and NATO headquarters in Kabul.

While briefing the US Senate, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen categorically stated: “The Haqqani network, for one, acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan’s intelligence agency.” In a similar tone, US Defence Secretary Panetta told Senators that “the presence of safe havens in Pakistan is giving the insurgents advantages they have otherwise lost.”

White House Spokesman Carney called on Pakistan to “break any link they have” with the Haqqani network. The synchronised blame game has, however, been refuted vehemently by Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Defence and Foreign Ministers and the Chief of Army Staff.

History is replete with wrongful US indictments. The US attacked both Afghanistan and Iraq with apparent UN approval, but under trumped-up charges. In the case of Afghanistan, it invoked the self-defence clause, insisting that the Taliban regime was harbouring Osama bin Laden – the purported perpetrator of the 9/11 attacks.

Despite the Taliban’s insistence that the US provide evidence pertaining to the allegations after which Osama would be tried under the Afghan law, America invaded Afghanistan that has led to the death of over 40,000 innocent civilians. But it must be understood that “self-defence”, firstly, in both international and US law, must be clearly distinguished from the use of force for revenge or punishment; States, like people, must not act as vigilantes.

Secondly, in criminal law, “self-defence” may be invoked in the face of an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. In general, the threat must be immediate and the response must not be pushed beyond what is reasonably required to repel that threat. Thus, the invasion of Afghanistan was not a legitimate act of “self-defence” by the US post-9/11.

There is no UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution that authorises it, whether alone or in coalition with other countries, to attack Afghanistan.

Between September 11 and October 7, 2001, when the Afghanistan invasion began, the Council adopted only one resolution concerning the 9/11 attacks. Resolution 1368 (September 12) condemned the attack, while Resolution 1378 (November 14) adopted – after the bombardment of Afghanistan commenced – only condemns the Taliban and supports “the efforts of the Afghan people to replace the Taliban regime!”

The countries that plan wars in order to capture resources, conquer territories, or advance their strategic interests or hegemonic designs never lack noble-sounding pretexts: Self-defence, defending civilisation, rescuing threatened national minorities, and so on.

After no weapons of mass destruction had been found to justify the invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration argued that it was legitimate to overthrow a brutal dictatorship in order to free the Iraqi people. But to allow any country to make war entirely on false pretexts means throwing out international law and replacing it with “might is right.”

Now, the US is threatening to throw its erstwhile “most non-NATO ally” Pakistan to the dogs of war. It has already violated our sovereignty on two accounts: First, by launching the drone attacks, and secondly, the May 2 attack to “eliminate” Osama. Pakistan needs to take its case to the UN; however, this step may yield no results if former US Permanent Representative to the UN John Bolton is to be believed: “There is no such thing as the UN. There is only the international community, which can only be led by the only remaining superpower, which is the United States, when it suits our interest and we can get others to go along…When the United States leads, the UN will follow.”

The US, therefore, should take cognisance that attacking Pakistan won’t be a cakewalk. It is a nuclear-equipped and battle hardened country, which will defend itself or go down fighting. It is hoped and prayed that good sense prevails in the US administration!

The writer is a political and defence analyst.

====

NATO Oil Tankers Torched In Balochistan

http://www.pakistantimes.net/pt/detail.php?newsId=25371

Pakistan Times
September 28, 2011

NATO oil tankers torched in Balochistan

QUETTA: Three NATO oil tankers were torched by unknown men in the Mastung area of Balochistan, a report said on Tuesday.

The tankers were on their way from Karachi to Quetta when unknown men riding on motorcycles fired at them.

The unknown men fled the scene after the firing. One of the drivers was injured during the attack. Upon receiving information, rescue teams of the police and levies rushed to the scene. NATO oil tankers carrying supplies to troops in Afghanistan are often targeted by militants.

====

Pakistani Bar Association: Cut NATO Supply Lines

http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=69755&Cat=5

News International
September 28, 2011

Cut Nato supply: Bar

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court Bar Association on Tuesday unanimously passed a resolution demanding that the government sever Nato forces’ supply lines in wake of US threats to Pakistan.

The House said the USA had humiliated 170 million Pakistanis whose lives, honour and property were under threat; therefore, the lawyers’ community would stand by its government in this hour of need despite having differences with it on many issues. They urged the government to give a strong message to the USA that Pakistanis were brave and would not compromise on their sovereignty. They said Pakistan should withdraw from the so-called war on terror. LHCBA president Asghar Ali Gill presided over the meeting.

====

U.S. “Reviewing Aid” To Pakistan

http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=156018

Azeri Press Agency
September 28, 2011

U.S. reviewing aid to Pakistan: White House

Baku: The White House said on Tuesday that Washington is reviewing its aid to Pakistan, urging its government to take action in cracking down on the Haqqani network, as the two countries’ relations keep deteriorating this year, APA reports quoting Xinhua.

“We obviously are always reviewing our aid programs,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters in a press gaggle, adding that the U.S. takes it seriously and discusses these matters with its Pakistani counterparts, without providing further details.

The White House remarks came at a time when U.S.-Pakistani ties have hit a new low after senior U.S. officials, including chairman of the U.S. Joint Chief of Staff Mike Mullen, publicly accused Pakistan of backing the Haqqani network which was blamed for the recent attacks on the U.S. embassy in Kabul.

Carney reiterated the U.S. position that the Haqqani network was responsible for the attacks on Sept. 13, urging the Pakistani government to take action to “deal with the things that exist there.”

On the same day, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland said that the U.S. has slowed military aid to Pakistan until desired results are seen.

Nuland said that some of the military aid cannot go forward “unless the programs that it funds go forward and until we can evaluate with Pakistan where we’re going to go together.”

U.S.-Pakistani relations had already been substantially damaged in May this year over a secret U.S. commando mission that killed al Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan without the permission from Islamabad.

The U.S. has been giving out signals that it will cut military aid to Pakistan, while shifting more focus on the civilian aid in order to ease the strong anti-American sentiment among the majority of Pakistani population.

====

Afghan War: NATO Loses Over 450 Soldiers This Year

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-09/28/c_131165042.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 28, 2011

NATO soldier killed in eastern Afghanistan

KABUL: A NATO soldier was killed Wednesday in an insurgent attack in eastern Afghanistan’s Wardak province, the military alliance said.

“An International Security Assistance Force service member died following an insurgent attack in Wardak province located in eastern Afghanistan today,” said the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in a statement.

However, the brief statement did not release the nationality of the victim under the ISAF policy.

Troops mostly from the U.S. and Turkey, within the framework of the ISAF, are stationed in Wardak province, with Maidan Shar as its capital, 35 km west of capital city of Kabul.

Over 450 NATO service members, with the majority of them Americans, have been killed in the insurgency-hit country since the beginning of this year.

====

New Zealand Special Forces Soldier Killed In Afghan Firefight

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-09/28/c_131164611.htm

Xinhua News Agency
September 28, 2011

Second New Zealand special forces soldier killed in Afghanistan

WELLINGTON: A second New Zealand special forces soldier has been killed in a military operation in Afghanistan, New Zealand Prime Minister John Key announced Wednesday.

The soldier with the Special Air Service Group (SAS) was shot while the SAS were mentoring the Afghan Crisis Response Unit during an operation in Wardak Province near Kabul, said Key.

“I am saddened by the loss of this SAS soldier, the second from the unit to die in Afghanistan. It is a reminder of the volatile and dangerous conditions that our Defence Force personnel face in Afghanistan,” said Key.

The SAS were reacting to information about a team preparing to launch an attack on Kabul.

A child and a “fighting-aged” male were also injured in the operation, which had involved 15 SAS and 50 Afghan soldiers.

====

Afghanistan: Most Of $70 Billion In Foreign Aid Spent On Security

http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2011/09/27/51pc-aid-spent-security-forces

Pajhwok Afghan News
Se5ptember 27, 2011

51pc of aid spent on security forces
By Abdul Qaddir Siddiqui

KABUL: Of the $69 billion (3.3 trillion afghanis) pledged in aid by the international community, the Afghan government has received and spent $57 billion over the past decade, the minister of economy said on Tuesday.

Fifty-one percent of the foreign aid was spent on the security sector and the rest on agriculture, rural rehabilitation and development, infrastructure, health, education and good governance, Abdul Hadi Arghandiwal said.

One main obstacle to ANDS implementation was the huge allocation to the security sector and under-funded government budget, the minister said.

Arghandiwal said other impediments included widespread unemployment, lack of funds for securing development projects implemented by foreigners and the absence of a mechanism to monitor the use of funds.

====

Top NATO Commander In Turkey For Missile Talks

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=nato-official-makes-missile-trip-to-ankara-2011-09-27

Hürriyet Daily News
September 27, 2011

NATO official makes missile trip to Ankara
Sevil Küçükkoşum

ANKARA: The visit of a senior NATO commander to Ankara on Tuesday for talks regarding a radar system in southeastern Turkey as part of the alliance’s missile shield project came as Iran increased its criticism of Turkey’s recent attitude toward Israel.

“Landing in Ankara, Turkey, for discussions on missile defense, Afghanistan, Libya, and NATO reform,” NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander in Europe John Stavridis said in a post on Twitter late Monday.

Adm. Stavridis held talks in Turkey after visits to Israel and Romania. Stavridis met with Chief of General Staff Gen. Necdet Özel and Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz. Although the admiral requested an appointment with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, he could not meet Turkey’s premier due to Erdoğan’s busy schedule. The core of the discussions was the U.S.-led NATO missile shield project, whose early-warning radar system will be deployed in Turkey.

Ankara decided to host the radar at a military facility base near Malatya as part of NATO’s defense architecture. The discussions also included Turkey’s objections to Israel’s attempt to open a representation office at NATO headquarters, the Daily News has learned.

Turkey blocked a recent Israeli attempt to open an office at NATO headquarters when Tel Aviv submitted a request in early September.

Israel has made requests to open a representation office at NATO headquarters under NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue program that was launched in 1994 with seven Mediterranean countries.

The Iranian supreme leader’s top advisor for military affairs, Maj. Gen. Yahya Rahim, played down the current tension between Turkey and Israel, characterizing it as a political gesture.

“Turkey’s gestures against the Zionists are political and they [the Turks] have maintained their relations [with the Zionist regime] behind the scenes,” he said on Monday, according to the Iranian news agency Fars.

Adm. Stavridis last visited Turkey in March to discuss Turkish participation in NATO-led operations in Libya.

Meanwhile, pro-Turkish chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives’ foreign affairs committee’s sub-committee on Europe and Eurasia Dan Burton met Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan and was scheduled to meet with President Abdullah Gül and Erdoğan when the Daily News went print.

====

Turkish Opposition Parties Oppose NATO Missile Radar Base

http://www.tehrantimes.com/world/2980-opposition-parties-oppose-nato-radar-base-in-turkey/

Tehran Times
September 28, 2011

Opposition parties oppose NATO radar base in Turkey

Opposition parties in Turkey have expressed their disagreement with the Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan government’s decision to host an early-warning radar as part of NATO’s missile defense system on the country’s soil.

The leader of Turkey’s Democratic Party (DP), Namik Kemal Zeybek, voiced his opposition to the Turkish government’s decision and warned about its negative consequences, Press TV reported on Monday.

In an interview with Turkey’s TV 8 on Friday, Zeybek said NATO’s decision to deploy its missile-tracking radar system on Turkish soil is aimed at monitoring Iran’s moves and pitting the two neighboring countries against each other.

He added that the West is seeking to cause rifts in the world of Islam as Iran has resisted its dominance in spite of heavy pressure.

This comes as other opposition parties in Turkey have similarly disagreed with the plan, expressing concerns about its negative impact on the country’s relations with its neighbors.

The Republican People’s Party (CHP), headed by Kemal Kilicdaroglu, criticized the plan and stated that it is aimed at protecting Israel in the face of Iran’s missiles.

The leader of People’s Voice Party, Numan Kurtulmus, was also among the critics of the plan, saying that Erdogan’s government opposes Israel on the one hand while agreeing to a plan that is chiefly intended to defend Israel on the other.

Another Turkish politician, Mustafa Kamalak, who is the leader of Felicity Party, has additionally pointed out that Turkey’s agreement with the deployment of a NATO missile defense system on its soil will distance it from its neighbors.

Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal recently announced Ankara’s plan to host the Western military alliance’s radar system.

The Turkish official said the plan, which would “boost NATO’s defense capacity and strengthen [Turkey's] national defense system,” is in line with the alliance’s “New Strategic Concept” adopted in a summit in Lisbon last year.

Some in Iran say that Turkey’s hosting an early-warning radar system is to protect Israel, IRNA cited the defense minister as saying on Thursday.

“Installation of the radar system is to defend the Zionist regime since this regime is on a downhill trajectory and America has been forced to get involved directly to save it,” Ahmad Vahidi said.

“We will not allow any foreign forces to threaten our interests and we will strongly confront any threat,” he added on the sidelines of a military parade marking the 31st anniversary of the start of a bloody eight-year war with Iraq.

====

Baltic Sea: NATO Warships Bring “Regional Security In Pescadia”

http://www.aco.nato.int/danexnoco-2011-concludes.aspx

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Allied Command Transformation
September 27, 2011

DANEX/NOCO 2011 CONCLUDES

After 11 days of outstanding cooperation and combined operations in Exercise DANEX/NOCO 11, the “Multinational Maritime Task Group‟ under Commander Standing NATO Maritime Group 2 (SNMG2), Rear Admiral (LH) Sinan Azmi TOSUN’s command, ensured the safe sea lines of communication so as to create sustainable regional security in “Pescadia”.

The realistic exercise scenario, took place in the artificial region of “Pescadia” (the Baltic Sea) and involved sovereign nations, illegal activities like smuggling, piracy, terrorist movement and resolving territorial disputes.

Exercise DANEX/NOCO 11 took place over two weeks and developed through a period of military and political tension into simulated hostilities.

After deterring and disrupting piracy, protecting sea lines of communication, fighting air, surface and subsurface threats with numerous international partners, SNMG2 flagship, TCG ORUCREIS, sailed to Gothenburg/SWEDEN (a Partnership for Peace (PfP) country) to conduct a port visit between 23rd and 27th of September, 2011.

====

Death Knell For CIS: Eastern Partnership Conference In Warsaw

http://en.trend.az/news/politics/1937566.html

Trend News Agency
September 28, 2011

Speaker of the Georgian Parliament goes went to Warsaw to attend the “Eastern Partnership” conference of the EU
N. Kirtskhali

Tbilisi: Chairman of Georgian Parliament David Bakradze leaves early this morning for Warsaw, where he will attend the conference as part of the “Eastern Partnership” on “The Path to European democratic society, prosperity and a strong civil society.”

According to Bakradze, Georgia attaches great importance to partnership with the EU and aims to become part of united Europe as soon as possible. “In this way, we still have much to do and our government is taking all steps for the rapid European integration”, he stressed.

On October 1, the Chairman of the Parliament of Georgia will travel to Sweden, where he will host a “EU Eastern Neighbourhood – the transition from authoritarianism to democracy” conference.

He will participate in a panel discussion on “What can and should make the EU”.

As part of his tour Bakradze also visit the UK, where he will visit the Congress of the Conservative Party at the invitation of its leaders.

====

U.S.’s Bryza Continues 17-Year Trans-Caspian Pipeline Advocacy

http://en.trend.az/capital/energy/1937832.html

Trend News Agency
September 28, 2011

U.S.: Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan should independently decide on gas cooperation with Europe
V. Zhavoronkova

Baku: Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan should independently decide on how they are going to cooperate with Europe in the energy issues, U.S. Ambassador Matthew Bryza said on Wednesday during the meeting of Caspian European Integration Business Club (CEIBC).

“Our view is very strong that is no one else’s business how Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan decide to cooperate with Europe,” he added.

He underscored that the U.S. and its European allies are very interested in diversifying the natural gas supply…

He voiced the U.S. support to Azerbaijan in the framework of bilateral [agreements], saying that the country offers strong support to the implementation of the Trans-Caspian pipeline project.

“I am very glad that this interconnection between Europe and Turkmenistan makes absolute commercial sense. It will be implemented unless one does something really strong to block it. But the European Union decided on it and stated that all its machinery will do everything possible to execute this decision,” Bryza said.

He underscored that the U.S. cares about the implementation of the whole Southern Energy Corridor…

Early in September the EU adopted a mandate to negotiate a legally binding treaty between the EU, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan to build a Trans-Caspian Pipeline System.

Later, Iran and Russia expressed a negative attitude toward this project. Tehran and Moscow think that the pipeline construction will damage the Caspian Sea environment.

The pipeline, with a length of 300 kilometers, will be laid from the Turkmen coast of the Caspian Sea to Azerbaijan, where it will be connected to the Southern Gas Corridor.

Talks between Turkmenistan and the EU and other countries on the construction of the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline have been conducted since late 1990s. Its construction is now difficult because of unresolved status of the Caspian Sea.

====

Categories: Uncategorized

José-Maria de Heredia: Drunk with dreams that brutal conquests bring

September 28, 2011 Leave a comment

Anti-war essays, poems, short stories and literary excerpts

José-Maria de Heredia
From The Trophies (1893)
Translated by John Myers O’Hara and John Hervey

The Conquistadores

As from their native eyries hawks take wing,
Spurred by the miseries they proudly share,
Bravos and chiefs from Palos de Moguer
Sail drunk with dreams that brutal conquests bring.
They seek the treasures fabulous to wring
From the far mines Cipango’s mountains bear,
The trade winds fill their sails and waft them where
Mysterious western shores lie beckoning.
Each evening for an epic dawn they yearn,
The phosphorescent seas that round them burn
Enchant their restless sleep with phantom gold;
And as from white-winged caravels they lean,
In unknown skies their wondering eyes behold
Strange stars ascend from Ocean’s depths unseen.

*****

To a Cuban Fountain

Beside the fountain, at the close of day,
I love to lie, by its sweet coolness wooed,
And from my heart rise in that solitude
Thoughts like the drops that wreathe its urn with spray.
Oft the white splendors of the moonlight play
Upon its sculptured shape and half delude;
Living it seems – fond error of my mood,
Its form endowed with charms that melt away.
O my fair Indian, the sun’s own love,
From maiden dreams awakened by the dove
That lulls thee with her vague and tender song;
Cuba, my land, beneath thy palms so fair,
Whose sweet-voiced streams murmur of passion where
Through radiant nights their music they prolong.

Categories: Uncategorized

Updates on Libyan war/Stop NATO news: September 27, 2011

September 27, 2011 1 comment

====

Sirte: Fleeing Civilians Accuse NATO Of Massacre, Genocide

193 Days Of Bombing: 24,040 NATO Sorties, 8,975 Strike Sorties

Canada Extends Libyan War Mission To End Of Year

Russia Blasts NATO For Ignoring, Undermining United Nations

U.S. Global Missile Shield Affects World Strategic Balance: Russia

Afghan Officials: NATO Forces Kill 19 Civilians

Afghan War: NATO Triples Size Of Air Base Near Iranian Border

Pentagon Deploying 800 More Trainers To Afghanistan

U.S., NATO Withdrawal To Stabilize Afghanistan: Russian Official

Pakistan Warns U.S. Against Unilateral Actions

Cuban Foreign Minister At United Nations: New U.S., NATO Military Doctrines More Aggressive Than Ever, Target Entire Planet

Four NATO Soldiers, Seven Serbs Injured In Kosovo Clash

Kosovo: NATO Removes Roadblocks, Tear Gases Serbs, Who Erect New Roadblocks

U.S. To Sell Iraq 18 F-16 Warplanes

U.S. Drone Crashes In Somalia

Drones Make War Too Easy

Israel: Top NATO/EUCOM Military Chief In Secretive Talks

U.S., Turkey Agree On Delivery Schedule For Predator Drones

Missiles, Cyprus: Top NATO Commander Arrives In Turkey From Israel

Turkish F-16s Bomb Northern Iraq

Bulgaria Provides Legionaries For NATO, EU Operations Abroad

Clinton, Georgian Counterpart Plan Further Development Of Strategic Partnership

U.S.-Polish Missile Deployment Agreement In Force

New U.S. Air Force Missile To Disable Enemy Electronics

“Enemy Airfield”: Largest Dutch War Games In 15 Years

Clinton, Georgian Foreign Minister Discuss NATO Integration

EU’s Eastern Partnership Conference Begins In Two Days

====

Sirte: Fleeing Civilians Accuse NATO Of Massacre, Genocide

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/civilians-accuse-nato-of-massacre-in-sirte-raids/story-e6frg6so-1226148378383

The Australian/The Times
September 28, 2011

Civilians accuse NATO of massacre in Sirte raids

The civilians pouring out of the besieged city of Sirte accused NATO of genocide yesterday as rebel forces called in reinforcements and prepared for a fresh assault on Muammar Gaddafi’s home town.

Long lines of civilian vehicles were leaving after a night of NATO air attacks on the town. Rebel forces fighting for the National Transitional Council added artillery and mortar fire.

The people leaving the town, many looking scared, said conditions inside Sirte were disastrous. They made claims which, if verified, are a challenge for NATO – which operates under a UN mandate to protect civilians – saying the NATO bombing raids hit homes, schools and hospitals.

“It was worse than awful,” said Riab Safran, 28, as his car was searched by rebel fighters outside Sirte. His family had slept on the beach because the houses were being bombed, he said. “They hit all kinds of buildings – schools, hospitals,” he said.

He could not distinguish between the NATO bombs and the rebels shells, he said, but believed it was a NATO bomb that destroyed his home on Saturday.

Residents said power and water had run out and petrol was 88 Libyan dinars ($72) a litre. The water shortage has produced an epidemic of diseases, according to medical staff at a clinic in the town of Harawa, 40km east of Sirte.

Additional reporting: AP

====

193 Days Of Bombing: 24,040 NATO Sorties, 8,975 Strike Sorties

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_09/20110927_110927-oup-update.pdf

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 27, 2011

NATO and Libya
Allied Joint Force Command NAPLES, SHAPE, NATO HQ

Over the past 24 hours, NATO has conducted the following activities associated with Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR:

Air Operations

Since the beginning of the NATO operation (31 March 2011, 06.00GMT) a total of 24,040 sorties, including 8,975 strike sorties, have been conducted.

Sorties conducted 26 SEPTEMBER: 102

Strike sorties conducted 26 SEPTEMBER: 34

====

Canada Extends Libyan War Mission To End Of Year

http://www.torontosun.com/2011/09/26/ottawa-extends-libya-military-mission

Toronto Sun
September 26, 2011

Ottawa extends Libya military mission
By Jessica Murphy

OTTAWA: Canada’s involvement in the NATO mission in Libya has been extended another three months.

Following a day of debate in the House of Commons, MPs voted 189-98 to keep Canada’s hand in the military mission in the North African country.

In a speech to the House, Defence Minister Peter Mackay argued it’s no time to ease pressure as Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s forces make their final stand and that Canada’s armed forces have played a key role…over the past six months.

“Canada was in at the start,” he said. “We should be there until job is done.”

Canada joined the mission last March and extended it for three months in June, with only Green Party Leader Elizabeth May opposing Canada’s continued military involvement.

NATO, which is heading the UN mandated mission, okayed a 90-day extension of the mission in Libya last week.

Fighting is still ongoing in Gadhafi’s hometown of Sirte and in other parts of south-central Libya.

Meanwhile, at the UN on Monday, Libya’s de facto prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, called on NATO to continue its mission…

-With files from Reuters

====

Russia Blasts NATO For Ignoring, Undermining United Nations

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/27/56829408.html

Voice of Russia/Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 27, 2011

Lavrov criticizes the West for ignoring UN

In his interview to “Russia 24” TV channel, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sharply criticized NATO for violating UN Security Council’s resolutions.

“This is the first time in history that UN’s resolutions are being ignored so outwardly,” Mr. Lavrov said. “Such actions undermine the UN’s authority.”

The UN Security Council’s resolution # 1970 introduced a total ban on supplying arms to any of the Libyan warring sides, Mr. Lavrov reminded. However, several countries, both European and Arab ones, have sold weapons to Libyan rebels.

There is also evidence that some Western instructors have trained Libyan oppositionists, and some servicemen from Western special forces have fought in the Libyan opposition’s formations, the Russian minister said.

====

U.S. Global Missile Shield Affects World Strategic Balance: Russia

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/27/56833667.html

Voice of Russia/Itar-Tass
September 27, 2011

Missile defense factor affects global stability – Lavrov

The deployment of missile defense elements in various parts of the world changes the configuration of international security, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday.

“This is a serious matter and verbal declarations that the buildup of global missile defense opportunities will not jeopardize strategic stability are not enough,” he said.

Mr. Lavrov called for legal guarantees that the missile defense potential will match the stated goals and will not disturb global or regional balances. This equally applies to Europe and the Asian-Pacific region.

The missile defense factor is beginning to influence the strategic situation, the Russian minister said.

————————————————————————-

http://en.rian.ru/world/20110927/167190601.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
Septmber 27, 2011

Strategic missile defense affects global security – Lavrov

The deployment of strategic missile defense systems in various parts of the world will alter the international security configuration, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday.

“Statements to the effect that the build-up of global missile defense capabilities will not undermine the foundations of strategic stability are not enough,” Lavrov told the 66th session of the UN General Assembly in New York. “The issue is far too serious.”

He reiterated Russia’s position on the issue, saying “solid legal guarantees are needed that the missile defense potential will measure up to the declared goals and not violate global and regional balances.”

“This is relevant both for Europe and the Asia-Pacific region where the missile defense factor has started affecting the strategic situation.”

Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said earlier in the day that no progress had been made in Russia-U.S. talks on the projected deployment of a U.S. missile defense system in Europe. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said last week he expected Russia and NATO to agree on missile defense at the alliance’s summit in Chicago due on May 20-21, 2012.

Russia has maintained a strong opposition to the deployment of missile-defense systems near its borders, claiming they would be a threat to its own nuclear deterrent.

NATO says it needs the shield, which will be eventually deployed in the Mediterranean, Poland, Romania and Turkey, to counter the potential threat of missile attacks from the Middle East, particularly Iran.

Russia and NATO agreed to cooperate on the so-called European missile shield during the NATO-Russia Council summit in Lisbon in November 2010. NATO insists there should be two independent systems that exchange information, while Russia favors a joint system with full-scale interoperability.

————————————————————————–

http://www.itar-tass.com/en/c32/234721.html

Itar-Tass
September 27, 2011

No progress at Russia-US missile defense negotiations

TASS-TVCHEBARKUL, Chelyabinsk region: There is no progress at the Russia-U.S. missile defense negotiations, and the United States continues the rapid implementation of its plans, Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said on Tuesday.

“No breakthroughs have been made. The American partners continue to implement their plans in the deployment of the European segment of the U.S. missile defense network,” he said.

The opinion that a NATO missile defense network is being created in Europe is erroneous, he said. “In fact, the Americans are fulfilling their own plans in Europe. Alas, these works are far ahead of the [missile defense] dialog of Russia, the United States and NATO,” he said.

Russia is ready for compromises but they must be reasonable, the deputy minister observed. “There is a certain red line, the questions of defense, and any compromises are impossible there,” he said. The Russian Defense Ministry has computed “the entire range of military and technical measures to deter threats close to the Russian borders,” he said.

Russia keeps explaining its proposals, including the sectorial defense, to the partners, among them Romania and Turkey, but to no avail, Antonov said.

“I would not say that the reset policy has come into a deadlock. I think our American and NATO partners realize that stubbornness will lead to nothing. We need solutions, we need a search. We clearly declare our problems and say why the implementation of the American plans causes our concerns, and we offer solutions. They smile at us and carry on their plans,” he said.

Earlier this month Russian military strategy expert Alexei Arbatov has called ‘a political mistake’ the deployment of the U.S. missile defense system in Europe in disregard of the opinion of Moscow.

“Such actions cannot be taken without coordination with Russia,” he told reporters on September 20.

“The U.S. course is absolutely destructive,” said Arbatov, who heads the International Security Center of the World Economy and International Affairs Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. “In fact, the Americans suggest that no matter what Russia may say they will implement their plan [of the missile defense network deployment], which has been coordinated with NATO.”

The course of U.S. President Barack Obama is practically similar with the position of the George W. Bush administration, he said. “This applies not only to missile defense but also to other aspects of the relations with Russia,” the expert noted.

The U.S. agreements with Bucharest (the deployment of an interceptor missile base by 2015) and Ankara (the deployment of a NATO missile warning radar station) “have no strategic role, because U.S. missiles based in Romania will never be able to intercept Russian intercontinental missiles, especially those based on submarines,” Arbatov said.

The expert said that the Russian aerospace defense program for the period until 2020 was a reply to the U.S. global missile defense initiative.

He does not think that the U.S. “may be interested in the new arms race, which is a suicidal act of self-exhaustion, but it wants to get on Russia’s nerves.”

Russian Permanent Representative to NATO, Presidential Envoy for Missile Defense Interaction with the Alliance Dmitry Rogozin said two weeks before West European leaders hoped that the election campaigns in the United States and Russia would have no effect on the missile defense dialog.

He told Itar-Tass on September 16 he had been visiting European capitals in the past month to listen to the response of European leaders to the message President Dmitry Medvedev sent early this year to spell out Russian ideas and concerns in the missile defense project.

“Certainly, I cannot disclose these answers fully, but I would like to say that European leaders hope for mutual understanding of Russia and the United States in the missile defense issue. They also hope that the election campaigns, which have begun in the United States and Russia, will have no effect on the missile defense dialog and will not narrow the space for maneuver in the search for consent,” he said.

“West European members of NATO are not interested in the construction of ballistic missile interception sites in Europe. Actually, they agree only to the first and second phases of the missile defense project [that is the protection from tactical missiles of the medium and shorter range]. That plan is focused on the creation of a missile defense perimeter in Southern Europe, including the deployment of Aegis BMD-equipped ships in the Mediterranean Sea. The USS Monterey has been on mission there since March 2011. The construction of a radar station in Turkey and a base in Romania also belong to this phase. As for the third and fourth stages [the protection from intercontinental ballistic missiles], the need to deploy such systems in Northern Europe, among them the missile interceptor base in Poland, is not quite obvious to West European states,” he said.

The U.S. has a different view and pushes “not only the first two stages of the missile defense project but also the third and fourth stages of ballistic defense,” he said.

Washington and Warsaw put the cart before the horse with their agreement to deploy a missile interceptor base in Poland, Rogozin said. “The missile interceptor base in Poland is a part of the third and fourth phases of the deployment of the missile defense network in Europe aimed to intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles,” he said.

“The agreement of the United States and a number of East European countries presents the other European NATO members with a fait accompli. That is being done at the time when the diplomatic influence on states suspected of a wish to breach the non-proliferation regime has not been exercised fully. We are witnessing an attempt to accelerate the missile defense project and to put the cart before the horse, a large geopolitical horse,” Rogozin said.

“As for the Russian position at the negotiations, it is subject to evolution. That is what the craft of diplomacy is about – one finds solutions in the balance of possibilities, the junction of interests and the coincidence of views. First of all, NATO has its zone of responsibility and Russia has its zone. They must not clash. Secondly, we continue to insist on the signing of a legally binding treaty, which will lift Russia’s subjective concerns related to the missile defense plans of the United States,” Rogozin said.

====

Afghan Officials: NATO Forces Kill 19 Civilians

http://en.trend.az/regions/world/afghanistan/1937024.html

Trend News Agency
September 26, 2911

US-led forces kill 19 Afghan civilians

Afghan officials say at least 19 civilians have been killed during a military operation carried out by US-led forces in troubled eastern Afghanistan, Press TV reports.

The head of the provincial council of Afghanistan’s eastern province of Nuristan said on Monday that the deadly operation had been conducted by foreign forces last Wednesday.

Similar operations by US-led troops in the eastern provinces of Wardak, Logar and Paktia left at least 12 people dead and injured several others on Sunday.

In another deadly incident on Sunday, five Afghan people were killed in a US-led airstrike, the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said.

Hundreds of civilians have lost their lives in US-led airstrikes and ground operations in various parts of Afghanistan over the past few months, with Afghans becoming more and more outraged over the seemingly endless number of deadly assaults.

Civilian casualties caused by NATO attacks have been a major source of tension between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the US-led military alliance.

Afghans have held several protests against NATO over the issue of civilian casualties.

====

Afghan War: NATO Triples Size Of Air Base Near Iranian Border

http://www.aco.nato.int/shindand-air-base-rising-on-the-wings-of-national-efforts–international-support.aspx

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Allied Command Operations
September 26, 2011

Shindand Air Base rising on the wings of national efforts, international support

What provides the capability for combat forces to travel greater distances by acting as a conduit to the resupply of soldiers, ammunition, equipment and fuel? What system can move forces faster and farther than their own means can carry them? And what can destroy targets no longer in range of army and naval units? An air force, and in the Herat Province, Afghanistan, work is fervently underway to develop a premier air base to execute these missions.

“Shindand has come a long way over the past year, and will continue to develop immensely,” said Capt. Gregory Ward, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers officer in charge of engineering and advisor at Shindand.

The air base has already tripled its original size, becoming the second largest air installation in Afghanistan next to Bastion Field in Helmand Province. So far, eight miles of fence line has expanded the base by 2,900 acres to make room for new living and working areas for 3,000 personnel.

In July, Shindand also saw the opening of a strategic taxiway which allowed for simultaneous traffic of fixed-wing aircraft, greatly improving mission capabilities. And, this August, a 112,000 square meter rotary-wing apron was opened to park dozens of UH-60 Blackhawks, CH-47 Chinooks and AH-64 Apache helicopters. Growth does not stop there: a myriad of construction projects are currently in progress to support the burgeoning air base, its airmen and support personnel.

When it comes to training, NATO and Afghan forces have learned from history, and understand that it takes more than just the building of facilities and the providing of equipment to create an air force…

“We won’t finish building the Afghan air force until about 2016,” said Lt. Gen. William B. Caldwell, IV, NTM-A commander…

“From a sleepy forward operating base in the middle of nowhere, Shindand has grown into an air base that will support the Afghan National Army and Afghan Air Force for years to come,” said Captain Ward.

====

Pentagon Deploying 800 More Trainers To Afghanistan

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-commander-says-800-more-us-trainers-heading-to-afghanistan-by-march/2011/09/26/gIQAs8lPzK_story.html

Associated Press
September 26, 2011

US commander says 800 more US trainers heading to Afghanistan by March

WASHINGTON: The number of American military trainers in Afghanistan will increase by 800 by next March, a jump of nearly 25 percent in the U.S. commitment there, the top commander in charge of training said Monday.

Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, who heads NATO’s training mission in Afghanistan, told Pentagon reporters that even as the number of combat troops begins to drop, more trainers are needed…

Caldwell said NATO and the U.S. expect that it would cost up to $6 billion annually to support and train the Afghan forces after 2014…

====

U.S., NATO Withdrawal To Stabilize Afghanistan: Russian Official

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/27/56812870.html

Voice of Russia/Interfax
September 27, 2011

Western troop withdrawal will stabilize Afghanistan – Russian anti-drug chief

The withdrawal of Western coalition troops from Afghanistan will stabilize the situation in the country, chief of Russia’s federal drug control agency Viktor Ivanov has told reporters.

He said that the escalation of tension in Afghanistan is in direct proportion to the number of foreign troops deployed there.

Moscow is concerned over massive drug flows from Afghanistan to Russia.

Ninety percent of Afghan heroin is smuggled into the Russian territory, mostly through Kyrgyzstan.

Russia and Kyrgyzstan signed an agreement on cooperation to curb drug trafficking.

====

Pakistan Warns U.S. Against Unilateral Actions

http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/27-Sep-2011/America-warned-against-any-unilateral-action

The Nation
September 27, 2011

America warned against any unilateral action

ISLAMABAD – Amid heightened tension, the United States is making hectic diplomatic efforts to win back Pakistan’s crucial cooperation for secured NATO supplies as well as safe withdrawal of its overstretched troops from Afghanistan by 2014.

This has transpired after a flurry of interactions of senior US military officials and diplomats with Pakistani authorities ostensibly as a damage control exercise after some key US government functionaries launched efforts to make Pakistan a scapegoat largely to cover up its decade-long failure in Afghanistan.

In response to a question relating to the statement of US Senator Lindsey Graham that ‘all options are on table against Pakistan’, [US Embassy spokesperson Mark] Stroh said that this was in line with the statements of other US functionaries that Pakistan needs to take actions against those using its soil and attacking US forces in Afghanistan. “The US reserves the right to take action when its troops are targeted and attacked in Afghanistan,” the spokesperson said without naming Haqqani Network.

Although there was no Foreign Office input about the meeting, it was learnt that [ Foreign Secretary] Salman Bashir told the US envoy that any aggression or unilateral action against Pakistan would be disastrous for both the countries…

However, some sources were of the view that US has been seeking Pakistan’s cooperation in a meaningful engagement with some of the resistance groups in Afghanistan to ensure safe withdrawal of international troops.

This stems from the US fears that the rate of casualties of its troops would increase manifoldly in the course of withdrawal as the pace of insurgency in Afghanistan was on an gradual increase. These notions have been reinforced after the recent attacks on the US Embassy in Kabul as well as the local NATO Headquarters. Moreover, the US is seeking to ensure that NATO/ISAF logistic supplies through Pakistan remain unhindered till withdrawal of the international forces from Afghanistan by 2014.

====

Cuban Foreign Minister At United Nations: New U.S., NATO Military Doctrines More Aggressive Than Ever, Target Entire Planet

http://www.cadenagramonte.cu/english/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7254:cuban-fm-slams-most-recent-us-and-nato-doctrines&catid=2:cuba&Itemid=14

Radio Cadena Agramonet
September 26, 2011

Cuban FM Slams Most Recent US and NATO Doctrines

-Rodriguez said it was unacceptable that the UN remain impassive at such practice and warned over the danger that that the military intervention strategy in Libya could also be applied in other cases.
This new change of regime operations model shows that the current US and NATO military doctrines are ever more aggressive than the previous ones, and that the so called “Euro-Atlantic periphery” comprises the entire planet.

Havana, Cuba: “The current US and NATO military doctrines are ever more aggressive than the previous ones,” Cuban Minister for Foreign Affairs Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla denounced on Monday during the 66th session of the United Nations General Assembly.

The Cuban diplomat slammed the warlike policy imposed in the world by Washington and western powers through the so-called Atlantic Alliance, exemplified in the military intervention in Libya and the growing threat against Syria.

Rodriguez said that as early as February 21 of this year, Commander in Chief Fidel Castro “had warned that NATO was irremissibly preparing a war against Libya.”

He said that since then, “Cuba has been engaged indefatigably not in the defense of a government, but of a principle: the assassination of thousands of innocent people with the dubious objective of protecting other civilians is something unacceptable.”

“History has eloquently shown that peace can not be imposed either by war or by force,” Rodriguez went on to add.

He also noted that prior to the war against Tripoli, NATO imposed on the Security Council a dubious resolution supporting the attack.

Rodriguez said it was unacceptable that the UN remain impassive at such practice and warned over the danger that that the military intervention strategy in Libya could also be applied in other cases.

This new change of regime operations model shows that the current US and NATO military doctrines are ever more aggressive than the previous ones, and that the so called “Euro-Atlantic periphery” comprises the entire planet.

He cited the re-deployment of the Fourth Fleet, the installation of military bases and the sending of troops and military means to intervene anywhere in the region; the coup d’etat against Venezuela in 2002, followed by an oil coup; the sedition in Santa Cruz, Bolivia; the military coup in Honduras and the attempted coup in Ecuador fit perfectly well in the new strategy.

Meanwhile, Rodriguez defined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America and the merging Community of Latin American and Caribbean States as mechanisms of integration of the region.

In the face of a growing and universal threat of a war, a new distribution of the world and climate change, Rodriguez called on the South to act together as an indispensable condition to be safe.

Rodriguez also called on the General Assembly to avoid military action against Syria and accused the United States and Europe of waging wars to secure huge reserves of oil and water and confiscate financial assets in times of global economic and social crisis.

The Cuban foreign minister referred to the history of crimes of fascism against the Jewish and reiterated that Cuba only harbors fraternal feelings towards the Israeli people, while condemning the occupation on the part of Tel Aviv’s government of Palestinian territories.

“The General Assembly has the inescapable moral, political and legal obligation to ensure the recognition of an independent Palestinian State, with the boundaries established before 1967 and with East Jerusalem as its capital, as a full member of the United Nations Organization,” he stated and went to add: “It should do so with or without the approval of the Security Council, with or without the US veto, with or without new peace negotiations.”

Rodriguez urged President Barack Obama to make use of the power vested on him by the U.S. constitution to release the five Cuban antiterrorist fighters unfairly sentenced to harsh terms.

He recalled that Cuba condemned the 9/11 terrorist attacks and noted that meanwhile, Gerardo Hernandez, Rene Gonzalez, Antonio Guerrero, Ramon Labañino and Fernando Gonzalez were sentenced for having monitored Miami-based anti-Cuba groups.

“Once again, with all due respect, I urge President Obama to make use of his prerogatives to set them free as an act of justice or as a humanitarian gesture which will be highly appreciated by their children, wives, mothers, fathers and all of our people,” he said.

Likewise, he referred to the U.S. economic, financial and commercial blockade imposed against Cuba for nearly 50 years now, which has brought about losses valued at 975 billion dollars.

However, he reiterated the Cuban government’s willingness and interest in moving towards normalizing relations with Washington.

Rodriguez also referred to the current Cuban efforts to update the domestic economic model “so that our economy is more efficient and our socialism is better, in order to conquer all the justice and be able to fully preserve our independence.

====

Four NATO Soldiers, Seven Serbs Injured In Kosovo Clash

http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2011/09/27/4-nato-peacekeepers-wounded-in-kosovo-border-fight/

Voice of America News
September 27, 2011

4 NATO Peacekeepers Wounded in Kosovo Border Fight

Four NATO peacekeepers have been wounded in a fight at a Kosovo-Serbia border crossing after weeks of tensions in the region.

Seven Serbs were also hurt in Tuesday’s violence, which erupted when international forces began taking down Serb barricades at the disputed border point. Witnesses say NATO troops fired rubber bullets…at Kosovo Serbs, who threw stones toward the soldiers at the checkpoint.

Earlier this month, ethnic Serbs in northern Kosovo blocked roads leading to the border to protest a decision to put Kosovo customs officials at the crossing points in Brnjak and Jarinje.

Pristina, with the support of the [NATO] peacekeepers and the European Union, has moved to extend its government control in northern Kosovo. Ethnic Serbs in that area have refused to recognize Kosovo’s 2008 declaration of independence.

Belgrade considers Kosovo a part of Serbia and says it will not support the presence of Kosovo officials at the border crossings.

====

Kosovo: NATO Removes Roadblocks, Tear Gases Serbs, Who Erect New Roadblocks

http://www.adnkronos.com/IGN/Aki/English/Security/Kosovo-NATO-removes-roadblocks-Serbs-erect-new-ones-as-tensions-rise_312490657362.html

ADN Kronos International
September 27, 2011

Kosovo: NATO removes roadblocks, Serbs erect new ones as tensions rise

Belgrade: Nato forces stationed in Kosovo began removing barricades in northern Kosovo overnight and local Serbs erected new ones as tensions flared again Tuesday at one of two border crossings at the centre of a two-month-old dispute.

Nato’s KFOR force used teargas to disperse local Serbs holding a vigil at the roadblocks and arrested several people at the Jarinje border crossing with Serbia. One man had to be treated in hospital for his injuries, Serbian media reported.

The crisis broke out two months ago when Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian dominated government sent special police and customs officers to take over two border crossings with Serbia, Brnjak and Jarinje, amid a trade dispute.

Belgrade opposes Kosovo’s independence, declared by majority Albanians in 2008 and local Serbs, who form the majority of the population in the north, don’t recognise Pristina’s authority and object to Kosovo police and customs officers being placed at border crossings with Serbia.

A local Serb leader Branko Ninic said KFOR blocked all local roads in the north, cutting off several villages and making it impossible for people to reach work and children to go to school. Serbian television said the situation was tense with sirens sounding in the northern town of Leposavic early Tuesday and local Serbs massing at the disputed border crossings.

Ninic described KFOR’s action as “another provocation” ahead of a new round of European Union-sponsored talks between Belgrade and Pristina which were due to resume in Brussels on Tuesday.

Belgrade has accused KFOR and the EU mission in Kosovo (EULEX) of siding with majority Albanians and of overstepping its “status neutral mandate” as defined by the United Nations Security Council.

Pristina and Belgrade negotiators reached an agreement on customs seals to be used on border crossings with Serbia, but the two sides failed to reconcile their differing interpretations of who should control the crossings.

The crisis broke out in late July when Kosovo prime minister Hashim Thaci controversially sent special police to Kosovo take over two northern border crossings with Serbia from KFOR and European Union police.

Kosovo police seized the border crossings to enforce a ban on imports from Serbia. Kosovo’s government imposed the ban in July in retaliation for Serbia’s blocking of Kosovo imports.

Serbia is expecting to become an official candidate for EU membership in October, but EU officials have said it must first establish “good neighbourly relations” with Kosovo and resolve the crisis in the Serb-populated north.

Kosovo’s independence has been recognised by more than eighty countries, including the United States and 22 out of 27 EU members so far.

====

U.S. To Sell Iraq 18 F-16 Warplanes

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/27/56780481.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 27, 2011

Iraq to purchase F-16s

       
The Government of Iraq has signed a contract for the purchase of 18 multi-purpose F-16 fighters from the Americans who are supposed to leave their country before the end of this year.

The total cost of the transaction and the amount of money already paid for the combat aircraft has not been reported.

According to some reports, the amount of the Iraq contract is about $3 billion.

Negotiations between the U.S. and Iraq on the purchase of the F-16s have been ongoing for several years.

====

U.S. Drone Crashes In Somalia

http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2011/09/26/alleged-us-drone-crashes-in-somalia/

Voice of America News
September 26, 2011

Alleged US Drone Crashes in Somalia

An alleged U.S. spy drone has crashed in the Somali city of Kismayo, which is controlled by the militant group al-Shabab.

Witnesses in Kismayo told VOA that the unmanned drone crashed Sunday near the airport of the southern Somali city.

An al-Shabab website says the drone belongs to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It says the drone carried large cameras with long-distance lenses attached.

There are conflicting reports from witnesses and al-Shabab itself whether the drone was shot down or crashed on its own.

Last week, The Washington Post reported that the U.S. is expanding a drone surveillance program in east Africa and the Arabian peninsula to gather intelligence and attack al-Qaida-linked militants in Somalia and Yemen.

The report said the U.S. is building a new installation for the drones in Ethiopia and has already flown drones over both Somalia and Yemen from a base in Djibouti.

The U.S. has used drones to attack al-Shabab targets in Somalia in the past. The militant group is battling the Somali government and controls large sections of southern and central Somalia.

====

Drones Make War Too Easy

http://www.vindy.com/news/2011/sep/24/drones-make-war-too-easy/?newswatch

Youngstown Vindicator/McClatchy-Tribune
September 24, 2011

Drones make war too easy
By John B. Quigley

-If some other country were sending pilotless aircraft over Nebraska to shoot and kill people they regard as threats, the Nebraska citizenry might not be too happy.

COLUMBUS: Armed pilotless drone aircraft are the weapon of choice these days in our military forays into the Middle East.

President Obama approved use of drones in Libya last spring. He said they have “unique capabilities.” A target is identified through intelligence sources. The information is sent to the command center. Someone sitting in front of a computer screen fires a missile.

Drones can fly low. Gen. James Cartwright of the Joint Chiefs of Staff explained that for Libya, their “ability to get down lower” gave them better visibility, thereby getting a better bead on a target. And of course with no pilot the only risk is loss of the aircraft.

We are also now using drones in Yemen to target insurgents. In Pakistan we have been using them even longer.

But there is a downside. Drones, say critics, make war too easy. If a president doesn’t have to be concerned about putting our youth “in harm’s way,” it becomes much easier to go to war. Congress may lose control.

The information about the whereabouts of a “militant” may or may not be accurate. Last year the U.N. official responsible for tracking extrajudicial executions questioned the drone killings as arbitrary executions. When a drone attack occurs, typically the U.S. officials claim that those killed were “militants,” while local officials often claim that civilians were hit.

Killing without trial

Killing with drones means killing without a trial. But going back to the 1960s, the United States has signed on to human rights treaties that outlaw arbitrary killing. Drone killings skirt these safeguards. No indictment. No judge or jury. No defense.

But, says the Obama administration, in war one can kill without a trial. The drone killings are premised on the “militants” being participants in the “war on terror,” even though Obama avoids that Bush-era term.

If some other country were sending pilotless aircraft over Nebraska to shoot and kill people they regard as threats, the Nebraska citizenry might not be too happy. Negative reaction to our drone attacks has been strongest in Pakistan, where drones are regarded as a terror weapon. Residents of certain regions in Pakistan say they never know when a missile might fall on them out of the sky.

John B. Quigley is a professor of law at at Moritz College Law, Ohio State University. Distributed by MCT Information Services.

====

Israel: Top NATO/EUCOM Military Chief In Secretive Talks

http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=239676

Jerusalem Post
September 27, 2011

EUCOM chief visits Israel for talks with Gantz
By Yaakov Katz

-Next spring…the two armies will hold a massive ground forces exercise in spring of 2012 called “Austere Challenge,” which will seek to increase inter-operability between the IDF and the US Army.
The drill, which is unprecedented in its size, will include the establishment of US command posts in Israel and IDF command posts at EUCOM headquarters in Germany – with the ultimate goal of establishing joint task forces for the event of a future large-scale conflict in the Middle East.

Commander of the United States European Command (EUCOM) Admiral James Stavridis visited Israel on Monday for high-level talks with IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz.

Stavridis has visited Israel a number of times in recent years since Israel is under the jurisdiction of EUCOM, as opposed to the United States Central Command, which is responsible for American military operations throughout the Middle East.

The IDF and the US Embassy in Tel Aviv refused to comment on the visit, which for some reason was held under a media blackout. Stavridis met with a number of top IDF officers including OC Northern Command Maj.-Gen. Yair Golan and OC Southern Command Maj.-Gen. Tal Russo.

Stavridis’s visit came a month after Lt.-Gen. Mark Hertling, commander of the US Army in Europe, visited Israel. Talks with Stavridis were expected to focus on US-Israeli military cooperation, which includes a number of major military exercises that will be held over the coming year.

Next spring, for example, the two armies will hold a massive ground forces exercise in spring of 2012 called “Austere Challenge,” which will seek to increase inter-operability between the IDF and the US Army.

The drill, which is unprecedented in its size, will include the establishment of US command posts in Israel and IDF command posts at EUCOM headquarters in Germany – with the ultimate goal of establishing joint task forces for the event of a future large-scale conflict in the Middle East.

Shortly before Austere Challenge, scheduled for May, EUCOM and the IDF will also hold the Juniper Cobra missile defense exercise, which will include the Arrow 2 and Iron Dome systems as well as America’s THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) and the ship-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System. The exercise is expected to include the actual launching of interceptors from these systems.

====

U.S., Turkey Agree On Delivery Schedule For Predator Drones

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-257859-us-turkey-agree-on-delivery-schedule-for-predators.html

Zaman
September 25, 2011

US-Turkey agree on delivery schedule for Predators

Ankara: Turkey is expecting the delivery of Predators in June 2012, the Turkish defense minister said a day after the country’s prime minister announced that Turkey has agreed with the US on a deal involving the transfer of US-engineered unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that could prove crucial in combat…

“We have agreed in principle [on the delivery of Predators]. Negotiations will continue,” Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was quoted as saying by the Cihan news agency on Saturday in New York, where the Turkish leader was visiting on the occasion of the 66th session of the UN General Assembly. Erdoğan also noted that Turkey had offered to either purchase or lease the drones and that the two countries were still settling the details regarding the delivery of the Predators.

Following up on the agreement, Turkish Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz told reporters on Saturday that the drones to be received from the US would be delivered to the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) in June of next year, reported the Anatolia news agency.

“These [Predators] are UAVs with better qualities and features than the Herons,” Yılmaz said, and added that the Turkish-made Anka would also be ready for the TSK around the same time, as an alternative to Israeli-made Herons.

Turkey was disappointed by Israel’s failure to return six Herons it had sent to the country for maintenance, as it relies heavily on spy aircraft for surveillance missions that gather data on the activities of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) across the country’s borders in the Southeast.

Yılmaz did not give any details on the number of Predators the US would deliver to Turkey but acknowledged that Ankara had presented a request for the UAVs in line with the TSK’s needs. The minister added that the US and Turkey have been strategic partners and are cooperating in combating terrorism, which necessitated that both “support each other with no conditions or prejudice.”

====

Missiles, Cyprus: Top NATO Commander Arrives In Turkey From Israel

http://en.trend.az/regions/met/turkey/1937312.html

Trend News Agency
September 27, 2011

Senior NATO commander visits Turkey
A. Isgandarov

Baku: A senior NATO commander arrived in Ankara on Monday evening for a previously unannounced visit, the Turkish Foreign Ministry has said, Today’s Zaman reported.

James Stavridis, commander of the United States European Command (USEUCOM) and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), came to Ankara for a “routine visit,” Foreign Ministry officials said. He is due to have talks with Turkish officials on Tuesday, but there was no information regarding who he was schedule to meet with.

Stavridis arrived in Turkey right after talks in Israel. The NATO commander had talks with Israeli Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz and other top military officials, but there was no information about what was discussed in meetings there.

Turkish media speculated that Stavridis is expected to discuss the planned deployment of US radar on Turkish soil as part of a NATO-backed missile defense program…A row between Turkey and Greek Cyprus over gas and oil exploration rights in the Eastern Mediterranean and the future status of a NATO base in the western Turkish province of İzmir are also expected to be discussed in Stavridis’ talks in Ankara.

After Nicosia began working to develop the shelf near the shores of the island, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Ankara will explore for oil and gas in the exclusive economic zone of Northern Cyprus along with the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Erdogan and President Dervis Eroglu of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) signed in New York on Wednesday an agreement on the delineation of the continental shelf between two countries in the East Mediterranean.

====

Turkish F-16s Bomb Northern Iraq

http://en.trend.az/regions/met/turkey/1937161.html

Trend News Agency
September 27, 2011

Turkish Air forces strike Kandil Mountain
A. Tagiyeva

Baku: The Turkish Air Force struck blows on Monday night in the Kandil Mountain in northern Iraq, the Sabah newspaper reported.

F-16 aircraft bombed Kurdish separatist positions in the Kandil Mountain within two hours.

====

Bulgaria Provides Legionaries For NATO, EU Operations Abroad

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=132411

Sofia News Agency
September 26, 2011

Bulgarian Military Set to Complete NATO Interoperability Program

Bulgaria’s military is completing its program for interoperability with NATO forces, Defense Minister Gen. Anyu Angelov and Head of Defense Gen. Simeon Simeonov have announced.

Gen. Simeonov presented at a news conference Monday a report for the completion of the so-called “Program for the Accession of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria to NATO” and about Bulgaria’s cooperation with the Allied Joint Force Command based in Naples, Italy.

The Program in question has been implemented in order to increase the interoperability of the Bulgarian armed forces with those of Bulgaria’s NATO allies.

To mark the completion of the Program, the Commander of the Allied Joint Force Command Naples, US Admiral Samuel J. Locklear, will arrive in Bulgaria on Tuesday for the signing of a joint declaration with the Bulgarian Head of Defense, Gen. Simeonov.

“The Plan for the Development of the Armed Forces does not need to have substantial modifications at the moment. In early 2012, the Plan will be analyzed since there will be reorganization and restructuring of the military detachments of the Bulgarian Army,” the Defense Minister explained.

Angelov also revealed information about his participation in the latest informal meeting of EU Defense Ministers in Wroclaw, Poland.

He said the meeting was marked by the efforts of the Polish EU Presidency to find common ground among the various positions of the 27 EU member states in three areas: the planning and management of EU military operations withing the Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP); the future of EU missions abroad, and especially of the EUFOR Althea mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina; and the increase of the role of the so called EU battle groups.

The Polish EU Presidency has marked out the closer integration with respect to EU Common Security and Defense Policy as one of its major priorities.

====

Clinton, Georgian Counterpart Plan Further Development Of Strategic Partnership

http://en.trend.az/regions/scaucasus/georgia/1937007.html

Trend News Agency
September 26, 2011

US Secretary of State, Georgian FM discuss bilateral relations
N. Kirtskhalia

Tbilisi: The U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Georgian Foreign Minister Grigol Vashadze discussed in Washington Georgian-American relations.

According to the Georgian Foreign Ministry, the sides discussed the possibility of a Georgian-American meeting within the Charter on strategic partnership.

“The sides agreed to hold talks within the Charter with the participation of all four groups,” Georgian Foreign Ministry said.

Now a venue of the meeting within the Charter is being specified. If it is decided to hold such a meeting in Tbilisi, then Clinton’s visit to Georgia will be scheduled. Clinton will head the U.S. delegation.

Clinton and Vashadze discussed the further deepening of Georgian-American relations. The U.S. Secretary of State reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia.

====

U.S.-Polish Missile Deployment Agreement In Force

http://www.voanews.com/policy/editorials/europe/US—Polish-Missile-Defense-Agreement-In-Force–130571008.html

Voice of America News
September 24, 2011

U.S.-Polish Missile Defense Agreement In Force
Defensive system is designed to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles before they reach their targets

President Barack Obama announced approximately two years ago plans to pursue a new approach to missile defense in Europe – one that provides more comprehensive protection for NATO Allies and forces…

“To put it simply, our new missile defense architecture in Europe will provide stronger, smarter, and swifter defenses of American forces and America’s Allies,” said President Barack Obama on September 17, 2009. “It is more comprehensive than the previous program; it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost-effective; and it…enhances the protection of all our NATO Allies.”

In October 2009, Poland was the first country to commit, in principle, to host a land-based missile defense base on its territory. Poland was also first to conclude negotiations and sign a basing agreement in July 2010. Now with the Polish ratification process complete, the two countries issued a statement announcing that they are ready to take the next step…

“The United States and Poland are pleased to jointly announce that the Ballistic Missile Defense Agreement of 2008 and its Amending Protocol of 2010 on deployment of the land-based SM-3 system within Poland has entered into force, effective September 15, 2011.”

The Standard Missile-3, or SM-3 interceptor which will be deployed in Poland was originally mounted on U.S. naval ships. It is a…system designed to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles before they reach their targets. It is composed of a network of sensors for target detection and tracking; interceptors which will destroy incoming missiles by colliding with them; and a command and control system.

According to the joint statement, the U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense system will be deployed by 2018 at the Redzikowo Base.

“This base,” notes the statement, “represents a significant contribution by our two nations to a future NATO missile defense capability.”

====

New U.S. Air Force Missile To Disable Enemy Electronics

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/09/26/new-air-force-missile-could-disable-enemy-electronics/

InnovationNewsDaily.com
September 26, 2011

New Air Force Missile Could Disable Enemy Electronics

Modern armies rely on a wide range of electronics to help detect their enemies, coordinate their forces and aim their weapons. Today, knocking out those electronics requires sophisticated jamming aircraft, targeting the people using the electronics or the tech-frying side effects of a nuclear blast. But in the future, disabling enemy electronics may only take a single rocket totally harmless to humans, thanks to a new microwave missile developed by the U.S. Air Force.

The missile showed its ability to take aim at many targets and locations during a first flight test at the Utah Test and Training Range at Hill Air Force Base earlier this year. Upcoming tests could demonstrate its disabling power with high-power microwaves capable of burning out the electronics of even the most sophisticated air defenses, command and control centers, fighter jets and drones.

That first test of the Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project (CHAMP) was recently unveiled by Boeing and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory.

The three-year, $38 million program could deploy up to five prototype missiles, according to the Air Force solicitation issued in December 2008. A fully functional missile would have the capability to take out multiple targets and take multiple shots with high-power microwaves by itself.

The missiles might even help knock out swarms of enemy drones or manned aircraft before they ever get off the ground. It’s unclear if they could also target such aircraft in flight.

====

“Enemy Airfield”: Largest Dutch War Games In 15 Years

http://www.rnw.nl/english/bulletin/public-join-major-dutch-army-exercise

Radio Netherlands
September 26, 2011

Public to join in major Dutch army exercise

The Dutch armed forces are holding the largest military exercise in the Netherlands for 15 years.

Dubbed Falcon Autumn, the exercise will be taking place chiefly in the rural eastern province of Drenthe until 7 October.

Unusually, civilians will also be able to join in the exercise. They may be approached by military patrols, and participate at checkpoints in various locations where soldiers will be inspecting cars.

Falcon Autumn will involve 2500 military personnel, and 400 ground vehicles and attack ortransport helicopters. The climax will take place on Wednesday when a combined air and ground attack will be staged at motorsport racetrack playing the role of an enemy airfield.

It is the first operation in years to involve the entire Dutch airborne brigade, as at least one battalion has always been in action overseas.

====

Clinton, Georgian Foreign Minister Discuss NATO Integration

http://rustavi2.com/news/news_text.php?id_news=43251&pg=1&im=main&ct=0&wth=

Rustavi 2
September 27, 2011

Grigol Vashadze met with Hillary Clinton

Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia, Grigol Vashadze, met with the US Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton in Washington on Monday to discuss the issues of cooperation in the framework of the US-Georgia Partnership Charter.

The sides agreed that a omnibus meeting would be held soon but the venue of the meeting has not been specified. If the sides decide to hold the meeting in Tbilisi, apparently, US Secretary of State will visit Georgia.

`We discussed the issues tied with Georgia`s integration into the Euro-Atlantic structures, how our relations with NATO should develop and how shall we continue cooperation in the security sector with the United States,` Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergi Kapanadze said.

====

EU’s Eastern Partnership Conference Begins In Two Days

http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=155959

Azeri Press Agency
September 27, 2011

Eastern Partnership summit program was announced
Victoria Dementieva

Baku: The program of Eastern Partnership summit of heads of states and governments of EU countries and the Eastern Partnership countries, which will be held in Warsaw on September 29-30, was known.

APA reports that leaders of delegations will attend a dinner on September 29. Two plenary sessions will be held next day. The leaders of member countries and EU officials will discuss prospects of the Eastern Partnership.

The negotiations on signing association agreements with every country, visa facilitation will be highlighted during the summit. Then the summit’s final declaration will be adopted and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, EU President Herman Van Rompuy, Chairman of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso will hold joint press conference.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev was also invited to the summit.

====

Categories: Uncategorized

Audio Interview: Afghan Civilians Victims Of U.S. Night Raids

September 27, 2011 Leave a comment

Press TV
September 21, 2011

‘Afghan civilians often victims of US night raids’

Audio

Night raids conducted by U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan create the perception among Afghan civilians – who are the main victims of such raids – that foreign troops are “lawless, renegade forces that can perpetrate crimes at will,” anti-war activist Rick Rozoff says.

“Even though the identified or alleged targets are al-Qaeda or most likely Taliban fighters, the raids as often as not result in the death and wounding of innocent Afghan civilians,” Rozoff told Press TV’s U.S. Desk in an interview on Tuesday.

“So of course they are going to have a deleterious effect in terms of popular opposition to the presence of U.S. and other NATO troops in Afghanistan, who are going to be seen not only as occupation forces – which they are – but as lawless, renegade forces that can perpetrate crimes at will.”

“And the infamous night raids which are increasing in intensity as are the drone strikes across the border in Pakistan are an indication of the shift to what the Pentagon refers to as counterinsurgency rather than counterterrorist activities, a doctrine that has been elaborated by former ISAF commanders Stanley McChrystal and David Petraeus and now John R. Allen who is in charge of all the U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan,” Rozoff added.

Categories: Uncategorized

Xenophon: Socrates’ war sophistry; civil crimes are martial virtues

September 27, 2011 Leave a comment

Anti-war essays, poems, short stories and literary excerpts

Xenophon
From Memorabilia or Recollections of Socrates
Translated by H. G. Dakyns

I see (replied Euthydemus) you are afraid I cannot expound the works of righteousness! Why, bless me! of course I can, and the works of unrighteousness into the bargain, since there are not a few of that sort within reach of eye and ear every day.

Shall we then (proceeded Socrates) write the letter R on this side, and on that side the letter W; and then anything that appears to us to be the product of righteousness we will place to the R account, and anything which appears to be the product of wrong-doing and iniquity to the account of W?

By all means do so (he answered), if you think that it assists matters.

Accordingly Socrates drew the letters, as he had suggested, and continued.

Soc. Lying exists among men, does it not?

Euth. Certainly.

To which side of the account then shall we place it? (he asked).

Euth. Clearly on the side of wrong and injustice.

Soc. Deceit too is not uncommon?

Euth. By no means.

Soc. To which side shall we place deceit?

Euth. Deceit clearly on the side of wrong.

Soc. Well, and chicanery or mischief of any sort?

Euth. That too.

Soc. And the enslavement of free-born men?

Euth. That too.

Soc. And we cannot allow any of these to lie on the R side of the account, to the side of right and justice, can we, Euthydemus?

It would be monstrous (he replied).

Soc. Very good. But supposing a man to be elected general, and he succeeds in enslaving an unjust, wicked, and hostile state, are we to say that he is doing wrong?

Euth. By no means.

Soc. Shall we not admit that he is doing what is right?

Euth. Certainly.

Soc. Again, suppose he deceives the foe while at war with them?

Euth. That would be all fair and right also.

Soc. Or steals and pillages their property? would he not be doing what is right?

Euth. Certainly; when you began I thought you were limiting the question to the case of friends.

Soc. So then everything which we set down on the side of Wrong will now have to be placed to the credit of Right?

Euth. Apparently.

Categories: Uncategorized

Update on Libyan war/Stop NATO news: September 26, 2011

September 26, 2011 3 comments

====

Background On Haqqani Network

NATO Bombers “Soften Up” Libyan Cities For Ground Assaults

Libya: Nearly 24,000 NATO Air Missions, 9,000 Strike Sorties

Did NATO Attack Libya Because Of Oil?

Report: Russia, China, Iran Plan Counterweight To NATO Missile Shield

Missile Targets Afghan President’s Palace, Shooting At CIA Compound

Two NATO Soldiers Killed In Eastern Afghanistan

Afghan War: U.S. Boasts Of Success Belied By Debacle On The Ground

Top U.S. Senator: Consider Military Action Against Pakistan

Pakistani Commanders Prepare Response To U.S. Onslaught

Not Pakistan’s Job To Protect NATO Forces: Prime Minister

Pentagon In Virtual Declaration Of Hostilities Against Pakistan

Worst Case Scenario: U.S., NATO Troops Crossing Durand Line

U.S. Attack On Waziristan Will Be Met By United Response: Opposition

Foreign Minister: Kabul Attack Perpetrators Product Of CIA, Not Pakistan

Interior Minister: CIA, Not Pakistan, Created Haqqani Network

Haqqani Network: CIA Offshoot

Party Leader: NATO Backs Attacks, U.S. Bent On Breaking Up Pakistan

Has Pakistan Decided To Respond To Direct U.S. Attack?

Poland To Host European Partnership Conference

Russia Eyes Arctic Oil And Gas

====

Background On Haqqani Network

For history of the Haqqani Network as a component of the CIA’s Operation Cyclone in the 1980s and early 1990s, see:

NATO Expands Afghan War Into Pakistan

Afghanistan: Charlie Wilson And America’s 30-Year War

New War Rumors: U.S. Plans To Seize Pakistan’s Nuclear Arsenal

Christmas 2009: U.S., NATO To Expand New Millennium’s Longest War

====

NATO Bombers “Soften Up” Libyan Cities For Ground Assaults

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/nato-blasts-gaddafi-home-town/story-e6frfku0-1226146151358

Agence France-Presse
September 25, 2011

NATO blasts Gaddafi home town

NATO warplanes pounded Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte for the second straight day as new regime forces held back on the ground after a major push into the heart of the coastal city.

A day after entering Sirte in a surprise assault, National Transitional Council (NTC) fighters pulled back on the western side on Sunday, while east of Sirte others awaited their marching orders, AFP correspondents said.

Deadly fighting also raged in the oasis of Ghadames near the Algerian border in the west, a local official said, while further north, and south of Sirte, NTC forces gathered outside Bani Walid for a fresh assault on the town.

…NTC chief Mustafa Abdel Jalil said…”We were ordered to leave downtown Sirte because NATO has a mission to do there. We left after 7pm last night (Saturday),” he told AFP. Other fighters said the attack on Sirte will come on Monday.

NATO aircraft launched at least a dozen air strikes around Sirte on Sunday morning, an AFP correspondent said.

On Saturday, planes plastered 29 armed vehicles, a firing position, two command and control nodes and three ammunition storage facilities in the area, the alliance said in an operational update.

East of Sirte, fighters cleaned their weapons in preparation as dozens were ferried by pick-up trucks to the city gate.

“We have been told by our commanders to keep our guns ready. We expect fierce urban battle once we fully enter Sirte,” fighter Maatiz Saad told AFP.

Misrata Military Council spokesman Abdel Ibrahim said seven NTC fighters were killed and 145 wounded.

The assault on Ghadames, 600km southwest of Tripoli, came at dawn, killing at least five NTC fighters and wounding more than 30, said Muhandes Sirajeddin, deputy chief of the local council.

Heavy fighting also raged in Bani Walid…with NTC fighters coming under fire from inside the town, an AFP correspondent said.

====

Libya: Nearly 24,000 NATO Air Missions, 9,000 Strike Sorties

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2011_09/20110926_110926-oup-update.pdf

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 26, 2011

NATO and Libya
Allied Joint Force Command NAPLES, SHAPE, NATO HQ

Over the past 24 hours, NATO has conducted the following activities associated with Operation UNIFIED PROTECTOR:

Air Operations

Since the beginning of the NATO operation (31 March 2011, 06.00GMT) a total of 23,938 sorties, including 8,941 strike sorties, have been conducted.

Sorties conducted 25 SEPTEMBER: 104

Strike sorties conducted 25 SEPTEMBER: 42

====

Did NATO Attack Libya Because Of Oil?

http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Opinion+++Analysis/Did+Nato+members+attack+Libya+because+of+oil/-/539548/1242704/-/8fv3dlz/-/

Business Daily (Kenya)
September 26, 2011

Did Nato members attack Libya because of oil?
By Kamau Mbugwa*
 
   
Nato member states a have had their way in Libya. With China, the African Union and the United Nations having now recognised the Transitional National Council as the legitimate authority in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi has no chance of making a comeback.

While the Arab Spring revolution was locally driven in Tunisia and Egypt, the intervention in Libya by Nato has created a raging debate as to what exactly happened.

An argument has been advanced that Nato bombed its way into Libya because of its oil and did not care much about bringing democracy to the people. The fact that some of the rebels have had connections to al Qaeda fortifies this argument. Depending on whether Nato will move in to assist the NTC in stabilising the country and in creating an enabling environment for free and fair elections to take place, this argument cannot casually be dismissed. The fact that Syria (which has little oil resources) presented a similar situation but attracted no bombing from Nato further reinforces that thinking.

Some commentators have advanced another argument to the effect that Gaddafi had to be stopped because he was about to achieve his long-stated desire for a politically united Africa which Europe apparently would not like to see happening any time soon. This theory has other elements such as Gaddafi having finalised plans for creating an African bank, which would have put the World Bank and IMF out of business in Africa.

Further, that an African currency pegged to gold reserves rather than the dollar was underway, irked America into action against Gaddafi. This thinking is espoused mainly by those who have a romantic view of Gaddafi and those who believe that the West is never honest in its dealings.

The killing of black Africans who are perceived to have been hired by Gaddafi will alienate the ‘new’ Libya from Sub Saharan Africa. With the West increasingly losing investment opportunities to Asia, South America and Africa, the new Libyan leadership will soon understand Gaddafi’s wisdom in investing less and less in the West and more heavily in other regions and particularly in Black Africa.

If ethnic cleansing directed at black Africans continues under the leadership of the NTC, it will be easy to predict that sooner rather that later that the economy of Libya as well as its stability will be heading south.

*Mbugwa is an advocate of the High Court of Kenya.

====

Report: Russia, China, Iran Plan Counterweight To NATO Missile Shield

http://en.trend.az/regions/iran/1936522.html

Trend News Agency
September 26, 2011

Report: Iran, Russia, China mulling joint missile shield

Unofficial sources have announced that Iran, Russia, and China are currently holding talks on a proposal to establish a joint missile defense shield as a counterweight to a NATO defense shield, Mehr news agency reported.

The report, which was published in the Iranian daily newspaper Kayhan on Sunday, said that the sources cited two reasons why serious consultations have been held on the initiative.

First, all three states have come to the conclusion that U.S. officials’ assertion that their concern over the alleged missile and nuclear capabilities of Iran and North Korea is the reason for the decision to establish a NATO missile defense shield is just a pretext and the true objective of the shield is to threaten Russia and China.

In addition, now that the proposal to establish an early warning radar system in southeast Turkey, which is one component of the NATO missile defense shield, appears to be a done deal, the U.S. is now planning to establish other components of the new system in South Korea and Taiwan, which clearly shows that Washington is using the alleged threat from Iran and North Korea as a pretext to target China and Russia.

An informed expert believes China, which has not taken any action on the issue so far, is beginning to comprehend the level of danger posed by the new system, Mehr quoted the report as saying.

Russia’s analysis of the situation is similar to Iran’s view, which was expressed during Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev’s recent visit to Tehran.

Therefore, it seems the three countries have realized that the time has come to seriously start discussions on the plan.

Some sources say Dmitry Rogozin, the Russian envoy to NATO, who is scheduled to travel to Iran before the end of September, will probably hold operational discussions on the plan with Iranian officials.

According to RIA Novosti, Rogozin is going to discuss “strategic issues” in Tehran.

Military experts are of the opinion that since Iran, Russia, and China have made great progress in designing anti-aircraft defense systems, the construction of such a missile shield system will not be a difficult task for them.

====

Missile Targets Afghan President’s Palace, Shooting At CIA Compound

http://en.trend.az/regions/world/afghanistan/1936529.html

Trend News Agency
September 26, 2011

Missile targets Afghan president palace

A huge explosion has reportedly taken place near the presidential palace in Afghanistan’s capital city of Kabul, injuring at least three people, Press TV reported.

The incident occurred Sunday night when a missile was reportedly launched from an unidentified location, targeting the palace. The rocket attack was followed by gunfire, according to local reports.

Other wire reports, however, have quoted Afghan officials as saying that some shots were heard from a compound used by the main US spy network, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Kabul.

Afghan interior ministry spokesman Siddiq Siddiqui said the gunfire took place in Ariana Hotel compound which is part of the US embassy facility in Kabul.

A US official in Washington confirmed that there was an attack on a building used by American officials in Kabul. However, the CIA and the US embassy in Kabul have so far failed to comment on the incident.

The heavily secured building, only blocks away from the Afghan presidential palace, was occupied by the CIA in late 2001 following the US-led invasion of the Asian country, according to former US intelligence officials.

The attack came two weeks after Taliban militants fired rocket-propelled grenades and assault rifles at the US embassy and NATO headquarters in Kabul in a 19-hour siege of the buildings that left four civilians and two Afghan police officers dead.

====

Two NATO Soldiers Killed In Eastern Afghanistan

http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2011/09/26/2-isaf-soldiers-killed-bombings

Pajhwok Afghan News
September 26, 2011

2 ISAF soldiers killed in bombings
By Mohammad Farid Karimi

MAIDAN SHAHR: Two International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) soldiers were killed in seperate explosions in eastern Afghanistan, the alliance said on Monday.

In a statement, the ISAF said two its soldiers perished in two seperate improvised explosive device (IED) blasts, but it neither disclosed the victims’ nationalities nor the exact locations of the incidents.

A Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, claimed that eight US troops were killed and four others injured in a Taliban attack in the Syedabad district in central Maidan Wardak province.

Dr. Muslim, the Syedabad district chief, told Pajhwok Afghan News a US soldier was killed and three others were wounded in the Shiekhabad bazaar, where the Taliban targetted a US forces’ tank late on Sunday.

A tank was also destroyed, he said, adding one person had been detained in connection with the attack.

So far this year, 454 international troops, including 340 Americans, have been killed in Afghanistan. In 2010, the deadliest for ISAF, 711 foreign servicemembers were killed in the war-hit country.

====

Afghan War: U.S. Boasts Of Success Belied By Debacle On The Ground

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/26/56763414.html

Voice of Russia
September 26, 2011

American promises questioned in Afghanistan
Vladimir Gladkov

The Sunday shooting in Kabul reported by the BBC became another link in a chain of daring attacks in Afghanistan. An Afghan employee started shooting at a Kabul compound believed to be a CIA station, killing one US citizen and wounding another before being shot dead.

The shooting followed a series of recent insurgent assaults, including a siege of the US embassy and government buildings in Kabul and a suicide bomber’s attack at a NATO military base. Coming after the praise of the progress being made in a pursuit of stability in the region, the Kabul attack once again disproved the promises of American leaders. Considering the latest reports of human rights groups, giving Afghanistan’s own troops an extremely low assessment, America has a very small chance to get out of the region in the near future.

According to the BBC, the latest attack took place on Sunday night in the Ariana hotel, which is now believed to be a CIA compound. The reasons behind the shootings are unknown yet and there is no clear information whether the attacker was a Taliban recruit or if the violence started as a result of a personal dispute. The situation could easily have ended up much worse since the shooting started near the US embassy and almost provoked massive panic. A BBC source in the nearby Afghan presidential palace reports: “After the explosion was heard, an Afghan National Army (ANA) vehicle was passing. CIA-employed guards opened fire on the vehicle, thinking it had attacked them.” As a result, two ANA soldiers, one presidential guard and one CIA employee were injured.

The situation once again demonstrated that US commanders as well as Barack Obama himself should abandon the idea of even mentioning plans of troop withdrawal. The stability praised so much during the latest speeches of US leaders that has nothing to do with the current state.

“We have reversed the momentum of the insurgents”, said General John Allen, the commander of foreign military forces in Afghanistan, at a ceremony dedicated to the anniversary of 9/11. “On this sacred day of remembrance, I can say with confidence that, together, we’re on the path of success in Afghanistan.” This questionable claim was soon answered with a Taliban attack on a NATO military base in the eastern province of Wardak, when a suicide bomber drove a truck full of explosives into a compound wall, wounding nearly 77 NATO soldiers.

A few days ago Burhanuddin Rabbani, the chief of Afghanistan’s High Peace Council, was killed in a suicide bomb attack in Kabul.

The facts make it hard to take withdrawal promises serious. Meanwhile, another hope of America has also proved to be false. According to the plans of US commanders, after the withdrawal of NATO troops the role of law enforcement would be taken by the local militia. But the latest reports of the prominent human rights groups clearly demonstrate that the plan has completely failed.

====

Top U.S. Senator: Consider Military Action Against Pakistan

http://news.yahoo.com/senator-consider-military-action-against-pakistan-164625239.html

Associated Press
September 25, 2011

Senator: Consider military action against Pakistan

WASHINGTON: A Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee said Sunday that the U.S. should consider military action against Pakistan if it continues to support terrorist attacks against American troops in Afghanistan.

“The sovereign nation of Pakistan is engaging in hostile acts against the United States and our ally Afghanistan that must cease, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told “Fox News Sunday.”

He said if experts decided that the U.S. needs to “elevate its response,” he was confident there would be strong bipartisan support in Congress for such action.

“They’re killing American soldiers,” he said. “If they continue to embrace terrorism as a part of their national strategy, we’re going to have to put all options on the table, including defending our troops.”

====

Pakistani Commanders Prepare Response To U.S. Onslaught

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/09/us-might-opt-for-air-strikes-in-north-waziristan-warn-defence-experts/

Pakistan Today
September 26, 2011

US might opt for air strikes in Waziristan, warn experts
By Tahir Niaz

Corps commanders exploring options if US attempts attacks inside Pakistan; Ask civil, military leadership to present united front

-“Pakistan has to see whether the US wants to isolate it on the diplomatic front, capture its nukes, is preparing ground to impose economic sanctions against it, table an anti-Pakistan resolution in the UN or wants to launch a military action against it.”…Pakistan must view itself as vulnerable and prepare a concrete strategy to bear a US onslaught.

ISLAMABAD – Defence and security experts have forewarned the civilian and military leadership of Pakistan that the US might opt for air strikes in North Waziristan. However, they believe that the US would not take out a ground offensive inside Pakistan.

Commenting on Pak-US relations against the backdrop of mounting US pressure on the Pakistani government and allegations against the Pakistan Army, former ISI Chief, Lt. General (r) Javed Ashraf Qazi, said Pak-US tension was a serious issue for Pakistan. He said the US had mounted a baseless campaign against Pakistan, which was not without ulterior motives.

He said, “Pakistan has to see whether the US wants to isolate it on the diplomatic front, capture its nukes, is preparing ground to impose economic sanctions against it, table an anti-Pakistan resolution in the UN or wants to launch a military action against it,” he said. Qazi said Pakistan must view itself as vulnerable and prepare a concrete strategy to bear a US onslaught.

Asked how significant the two corps commanders meetings held last month were, Qazi said the forum discussed the situation and discussed a military field strategy to counter any US offensive. He warned the US might opt for air strikes in North Waziristan and take out selective helicopter operations inside Pakistani territory.

However, he said the US will not dare a ground offence inside Pakistan.

However, he said blocking NATO supplies would be an extreme step, which should be chosen if UN sanctions were imposed against it. Prominent security analyst Dr. Hassan Askari Rizvi said if the US continues its public denunciation, it will irreparably damage Pak-US relations and undermine US efforts to control terrorism in the region.

He said the two corps commander meetings this month suggested military officials were weary of the direct and blunt US campaign. He said the US might use their military might in North Waziristan and the corps commanders wanted to discuss the options available to Pakistan in such a situation. He said the US had two options but neither would ensure US success in the region.

However, he said, exercising these options will destroy Pak-US relations in all fields. He said a US attack on Pakistan will strengthen religious hardliners. On the question of blocking NATO supplies, Rizvi said Pakistan could opt for the strategy if the US decided to use military power inside Pakistan. Former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said the political and military leadership should evolve a joint strategy to face mounting US pressure on Pakistan.

====

Not Pakistan’s Job To Protect NATO Forces: Prime Minister

http://paktribune.com/news/Its-not-Pak-job-to-protect-Nato-forces-PM-Gilani-243878.html

Pakistan Tribune
September 25, 2011

It’s not Pak job to protect Nato forces: PM Gilani

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, vehemently denying US allegations, said Islamabad strongly rejects accusations of complicity with the Haqqani network or of a proxy war.

“The blame game is self-defeating as it will only benefit the enemies of peace. Only terrorists and militants will gain from any fissures and divisions. Pakistan’s credentials and sacrifices in the counter-terrorism campaign are impeccable and unquestionable,” the prime minister said in a policy statement made at a gathering of ambassadors, diplomats and donors on the occasion of a briefing on the flood situation in Pakistan here on Saturday.

He said the allegations portray confusion and policy disarray within the US establishment on the way forward in Afghanistan. Clearly, there is concern over the deterioration of the security situation in Afghanistan, he said.

The prime minister said Pakistan cannot be held responsible for the security of Nato/Isaf forces in Afghanistan.

“While there have been terrorist attacks in Kabul and Wardak, there have also been numerous attacks in Pakistan launched from sanctuaries and safe havens in Nooristan and Kunar in Afghanistan,” he said.

The prime minister said it was also the responsibility of the Afghan National Army, Nato and Isaf forces not to allow such cross-border militancy.

====

Pentagon In Virtual Declaration Of Hostilities Against Pakistan

http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Columns/24-Sep-2011/A-feckless-leadership-invites-aggression

The Nation
September 24, 2011

A feckless leadership invites aggression
By Inayatullah*

-According to one estimate, 30,000 civilians and 5,000 security forces have lost their lives. These numbers have exceeded the total American casualties in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And as against $15 billion or so reported to have been received from the USA, Pakistan’s losses during the period in question are reckoned to be more than $60 billion. Interestingly enough all along the American administration has been pressing Pakistan to “do more”.
It is, indeed, ironic that USA’s failure in Afghanistan is, to a considerable extent, attributed to Pakistan’s military for not doing enough, bringing to mind how Cambodia was scapegoated when Washington’s war in Vietnam had come to an ignominious end.
Presently, Pakistan is being targeted for the debacle in the neighbouring country.
-The latest statements of Panetta and Mullen are a virtual declaration of hostilities against Pakistan. Seldom is such a strong language used against a declared ally.

It all started with a selfish, egotistic and insecure military dictator’s abject surrender to a threat from a superpower.

Primarily for personal gain and strengthening the military’s hold on power in the country, he succumbed to do Uncle Sam’s bidding and agreed to place Pakistan’s resources at its disposal.

Airbases were handed over. Ground and airspace was open to NATO forces. The Pakistani army was ordered to break the time-tested policy of not militarily taking on the armed Pathan tribes in FATA. Thus, funds started trickling in for the services rendered. But while the dictate was readily complied with, no conditions or quid pro quo were secured in return for the commitments made.

Before he was pushed out, the general-president left the legacy of a political deal midwifed by Washington and London, which was based on a preposterous law that legitimised corruption and criminal offences committed by thousands of wayward politicians.

However, these politicians later assumed the reins of power at the federal level. With the passage of time they have proved to be the wily dictator’s worthy successors. In fact tainted, weak and vulnerable as they are, they let the overbearing superpower escalate pressure and unwholesome intervention on the country.

The unwarranted drone attacks increased enormously, despite unanimous resolutions passed by the Pakistani Parliament to stop the violation of the country’s sovereignty. These attacks have not only resulted in the killing of hundreds of civilians (along with a few Al-Qaeda leaders), but have also given rise to horrendous suicide bombings all over the country spreading terror and misery in all the four provinces.

The military operations in FATA and adjoining places have also taken a heavy toll on the displacement of civilians in the tribal areas. More than 100,000 Pakistani troops for the last seven or so years have remained engaged with the militants, forcing thousands of local inhabitants to leave their homes and hearths.

According to one estimate, 30,000 civilians and 5,000 security forces have lost their lives. These numbers have exceeded the total American casualties in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And as against $15 billion or so reported to have been received from the USA, Pakistan’s losses during the period in question are reckoned to be more than $60 billion. Interestingly enough all along the American administration has been pressing Pakistan to “do more”.

It is, indeed, ironic that USA’s failure in Afghanistan is, to a considerable extent, attributed to Pakistan’s military for not doing enough, bringing to mind how Cambodia was scapegoated when Washington’s war in Vietnam had come to an ignominious end.

Presently, Pakistan is being targeted for the debacle in the neighbouring country.

But some major questions are: With all the might of the NATO forces equipped as they are with state-of-the-art war military machinery, how come they have performed so poorly when it comes to taking care of the Taliban entering Afghanistan from Pakistan?

Why are there so few check posts on the Afghan side as compared to the number on the Pakistani side of the border?

Indeed, there are limits and constraints to capacity and national interests, which Pakistan has to keep in view while agreeing to extend operations as coerced by the US.

Instead of recognising Pakistan’s point of view, Washington has been hectoring Islamabad and threatening to take unilateral action on its soil.

After the Abbottabad strike, the possibility of such an operation has increased. The American media, Congressmen, the State Department and the Pentagon had been building up a case against the republic (Pakistan), accusing its military and intelligence services of complicity with the Haqqani group of Taliban considered to be residing in North Waziristan.

Pakistan denies any such complicity; the ISI has also been accused of backing up the Taliban in their activities in Afghanistan.

But little has been done by the federal government to engage the American administration and media to discuss the above mentioned contentious issues. Influential visitors have descended from Washington frequently to put pressure on our political and military rulers.

It virtually has been a one-way traffic. Some isolated visits by the COAS and DG ISI, but practically nothing has been done by our civilian leaders to engage their counterparts. There has been total absence of public diplomacy. This scribe in his columns has repeatedly highlighted this lapse with little response from Islamabad.

In the meantime, the anti-Pakistan lobby in Washington has been raising the temperature in the Congress, the Pentagon, the State Department and in the media in various ways. Any attack in Kabul is straightaway traced to the ISI. The latest statements of Panetta and Mullen are a virtual declaration of hostilities against Pakistan. Seldom is such a strong language used against a declared ally.

Unfortunately, our feckless leadership is utterly unprepared and till recently unconcerned with the ominous developments. So the whole burden of dealing with the threat has fallen on the GHQ. The Foreign Office’s denials and the discredited Interior Minister’s specious warning, as a reaction to sharp declarations by top American functionaries, carry little weight.

Pakistan presently is beset with natural disasters and internal strife, both mismanaged by an inept and profligate national government, also lacking spine and sagacity. The opposition is weak and fragmented. Will the foreign threat of an external attack stir up and bring it together? Why can’t our senior leaders led by Nawaz Sharif fly over to Washington and engage the authorities there to address the issues bedevilling US-Pakistan relations?

It is time Pakistan takes up these issues at the highest political level. Most instructive, in this context, is a report jointly prepared by the US Council on Foreign Relations and Aspen Institute India, which inter alia speaks about “possible contingencies” regarding the developments in Pakistan, including the possibility of the country’s nuclear complex “being” penetrated by terrorists. According to the study, Pakistan is facing a systemic decline. It asks India and the US to work jointly in dealing with the emerging situation in Afghanistan.

*The writer is an ex-federal secretary and ambassador, and political and international relations analyst.

====

Worst Case Scenario: U.S., NATO Troops Crossing Durand Line

http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Columns/26-Sep-2011/The-mother-of-all-follies

The Nation
September 26, 2011

The mother of all follies
Imran Malik*

The US and Pakistan have an intrinsic clash of strategic interests in the South-Central Asian Region (SCAR). They have managed to remain reluctant and unwilling allies thus far in the global war on terror, but now face the moment of truth.

The issue of the Haqqani Network (HN) has assumed decisive proportions in the wake of the Taliban attack on the US Embassy and NATO headquarters in Kabul recently. The US blamed Pakistan for waging a proxy war against it and the HN and the ISI for direct involvement in this attack. They seek vengeance and just retribution. Pakistan’s assertions to the contrary have predictably been rejected. Some analysts conclude that the US-Pakistan embroilment is escalating exponentially – from a veritably Low Intensity Conflict (LIC) to a Low Intensity War (LIW) and now potentially to a full-fledged one.

Operationally, the US has a number of options/combinations to tackle this situation. It could increase the frequency, ferocity, reach and spread of its deadly drone attacks. It could also carry out hot pursuit operations chasing down the supposed HN militants into Pakistan or try to snatch its top leader (like one of the senior Haqqanis) a la Osama bin Laden. It could also re-energise the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) to increase violent attacks from Kunar and Nooristan into Dir and Bajaur. It could also carry out blistering strategic bombings – cruise and ballistic missile strikes on the HN hideouts/installations – collateral damage be damned!

However, the worst case scenario would be if the US/NATO/ISAF/Afghan forces were to cross the Durand Line. Pakistan will contest this incursion with matching ferocity, violence, willpower and determination. It is further likely to squeeze and block USA’s critical logistics supplies and completely stop all intelligence sharing and counter-terrorism/military cooperation with it. Once both belligerents join the battle in earnest, ironically, a point of no return will be reached, a critical threshold will be breached and a decades-old relationship would come to a sorry and unpleasant end. The biggest irony would be that in this strategic equation, despite its losses in men and material, Pakistan would be erroneously perceived to be on the HN’s side; though it would solely be defending its own territorial integrity and sovereignty! And such a perception would have dire strategic implications for it.

Were the US and Pakistan forces to get embroiled with each other it would lead to a strategic mayhem. Would the other nations in the US-led coalition also attack Pakistan? Whether they dither or attack, would there be dire implications for their relations with the US, Pakistan and in their respective internal domestic politics? In case the engagement prolongs, then the US would need to draw additional troops from within Afghanistan inviting violent Al-Qaeda and Taliban attacks on those weakened positions. That will cause the withdrawal of US forces to be delayed beyond 2014. Could all this be a ploy for such a desired end state?

Could all this be deliberate? Were this adventure to misfire, (likely) Obama’s re-election bid will be irretrievably botched! Could this yet be a hidden agenda of some elements/factions within the US body politic/establishment?

The operational dividends of such a US adventure will be meagre. It might capture a few leaders (assuming they would still be around even after all these public ultimatums) and destroy some of their training and administrative infrastructure. They might also dissipate them to obviate their operations as a cohesive group, albeit temporarily, but would still not be able to exterminate them completely. The group may have already dispersed to concentrate again once the threat has receded.

The downside of such a strategic folly would be that Pakistan as an ally would be alienated and lost forever. The terrorists would get further radicalised, attracting more recruits to their cause! Pakistan would face the brunt of the militant backlash countrywide. The country’s economy will nosedive further and FATA would get more radicalised. The government will face existential challenges. The HN reprisals would be swift, ferocious, widespread and unforgiving; setting the AfPak region afire! A peaceful resolution of the Afghan conundrum will thus become more unattainable.

Pakistan and the US have difficult choices to make now. They can choose to defy and attack one another and end up committing mutual harakiri. Nothing would please the militants more, except to see the two ostensible allies take on one another rather than them. Alternatively, they could cool things down, carry out a rational assessment and come out with a win-win solution.

A joint US-Pak military option – perhaps, a classic hammer and anvil operation – can be ruled out. The saner choice would be for the US and Pakistan to create the desired strategic environment, offer the right inducements and encourage the HN to come to the negotiating table and help reach an acceptable-to-all solution. It gives the US (and its allies) a face-saving exit that they so desperately yearn for, saves Pakistan the trouble of carrying out further operations in the FATA, obviates the need for any cross-border operations by the US and its allies and, most importantly, helps find a peaceful solution to the Afghan imbroglio.

Leon Panetta’s many follies as CIA chief have led to this impasse and breakdown in the Pak-US ties. He continues in the same vein at the Pentagon. Better counsel should have prevailed. Such a misadventure will potentially sound the death knell for his President’s re-election bid, threaten the Gilani-Zardari government and inextricably and needlessly embroil the US-Pak forces on the battlefield. It is a patently lose-lose situation. It will only hasten the final split, ending this painfully unilateral under-achieving non-relationship with a bang!

If sanity does not return to this region soon, such a misadventure will tragically and most eminently become “the mother of all strategic follies”.

*The writer is a retired brigadier and former defence attaché in Australia and New Zealand.

====

U.S. Attack On Waziristan Will Be Met By United Response: Opposition

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C09%5C26%5Cstory_26-9-2011_pg7_12

Daily Times
September 26, 201

US attack on Waziristan will result in united response: Imran

* PTI chief says after coming to power, his party will liberate country from shackles of US, establish peace, harmony in Karachi and other cities of country

GUJRANWALA: If the US army attacked Waziristan, the whole nation would give a united response and counter it, and separation from the so-called US “war on terror” would end suicide attacks and jihad in Pakistan, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chairman Imran Khan said on Sunday.

Addressing a rally in connection with his “Remove rules and save country” campaign attended by 50,000 PTI activists and members at the Liaqat Park, Khan said that he had asked General (r) Pervez Musharraf to refrain from launching an army operation in Waziristan but he did so on the behest of the US and as a result we have lost 35,000 men. He blamed the “dollar-loving Pakistani rulers” for the mass killings of Pakistanis.

He said that the war on terror belongs to the US and not Pakistan, adding that the policies of the country were not in favour of national sovereignty, as a result of which American Army head Mike Mullen was issuing threats to our country today.

He asked President Asif Ali Zardari to inform the nation about his role under such crucial circumstances and said that our nation needed leaders and not ‘geedars’.

The PTI chief said that after coming to power, the PTI would liberate the country from the shackles of the US besides establishing peace and harmony in Karachi and other cities of the country. He said that the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), Pakistan People’s Party, Awami National Party all had armed wings in Karachi and it was only the PTI that was working peacefully in the port city and had the capacity to establish peace in the densely populated city of the country.

He said that the country had fallen prey to the recent floods and President Zardari had gone to Dubai for shopping.

He urged the people of Gujranwala not to vote for those leaders in the upcoming general elections who were subservient to US officials, adding that the country would soon experience a positive change, which will help Pakistan, stand on a firm footing besides strengthening its economy. Imran said that self-respecting Pakistanis garner respect from outside. He blamed the US for suicide attacks and terrorist activities on Pakistani soil.

The PTI chief said that the US was bombing the Afghan people, instead of fighting against the Taliban in the neighbouring country.

====

Foreign Minister: Kabul Attack Perpetrators Product Of CIA, Not Pakistan

http://en.rian.ru/world/20110926/167146550.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
September 26, 2011

Kabul attack militants product of CIA, not Pakistan – minister

Islamabad: The Haqqani group that the United States holds responsible for last week’s attack against the American embassy in Kabul was the CIA’s creation, Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said.

“If we talk about links, I am sure the CIA also has links with many terrorist organizations around the world, by which we mean intelligence links,” Khar said in an interview with al Jazeera.

“And this particular network, which [the United States] continues to talk about, is a network which was the blue-eyed boy of the CIA itself for many years.”

Scapegoating and blame games would not help and Pakistan wanted to be a partner of the United States, Khar said.

U.S. Adm Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, alleged last week that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency had backed the Haggani network in carrying out several attacks in Afghanistan.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik on Sunday rejected the allegations as “not based on facts”.

“Any intelligence agency would like to maintain contact with whatever opposition group, whatever terrorist organization for some positive outcome,” chief military spokesman Maj Gen Athar Abbas told CNN.

“Such contacts do not mean the ISI supports or endorses the organization,” he said.

====

Interior Minister: CIA, Not Pakistan, Created Haqqani Network

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C09%5C26%5Cstory_26-9-2011_pg7_9

Associated Press of Pakistan
September 26, 2011

CIA, not Pakistan, created Haqqani network: Malik

ISLAMABAD: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) created the Haqqani network and trained its members, not Pakistan, Federal Interior Minister Rehman Malik said on Sunday.

Talking to journalists at a ceremony held to laud the Islamabad police over the recovery of a huge cache of weapons, the interior minister said that the Haqqani network was present in Afghanistan and those claiming otherwise should give evidence of its presence in Pakistan.

To a question about the visit of a Chinese delegation, Malik said that several areas, including cooperation in the fight against terrorism, capacity building, drug smuggling and other issues would be discussed with the Chinese deputy prime minister and other officials.

====

Haqqani Network: CIA Offshoot

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C09%5C26%5Cstory_26-9-2011_pg7_22

Daily Times
September 26, 2011

Haqqani network, a US offshoot

LAHORE: The much-decried ‘Haqqani network’ that has put the state of Pakistan in hot waters, like many other ‘freedom fighter’ groups of Afghanistan, had close links with the US supreme intelligence agency, the CIA.

During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the network was like the Hikmatyar group [Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin], that developed links with the ‘outsiders’ to get support for establishing their military writ against the USSR, and CIA was the major financer of its activities in Afghanistan and its confidence level with the Americans raised to such a level that its head Maulvi Haqqani is thought to have even visited the White House to enjoy the hospitality of Ronald Reagan.

The American military and civil leadership today blaming the Pakistan government and country’s top intelligence organisation, ISI, for patronising, sharing and co-operating with the once blue-eyed darling of the US guys is considered to be the most fatal group for US and NATO forces ‘fighting’ in Afghanistan.

US military commanders believe that the “group is one of Afghanistan’s most experienced and sophisticated insurgent organisations” and “one of the biggest threats to NATO and United States forces…” Here is the brief introduction and history of its activities. The report is based on information gathered from different sources.

The group is still believed to be led by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani. Maulavi Haqqani is a former anti-Soviet resistance commander known for ruthless effectiveness as a fighter. His ties to Pakistan, and his base in and around Miranshah go as far back as his exile during the Republican government of Sardar Daud in early 1970s. He was initially associated with many mujahideen leaders that formed Hizb-e-Islami. When Hizb-e-Islami fractured in the late 1970s, Haqqani followed Younis Khalis rather than Hekmatyar, and became one of the most important commanders in the Hizb-e-Islami (Khalis) or HIK.

When Soviet forces invaded Afghanistan, Haqqani was in Pakistan with the other key mujahideen leaders. Haqqani later became a field commander in Maulavi Younis Khalis’s Hizb-e-Islami. He received significant support from the CIA and from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Directorate, and built up a sizable and competent militia force by the mid-1980s. Haqqani is believed to be influenced by radical Islamist principles drawn from the early Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which were prevalent among many of the religiously motivated Afghan mujahideen of that time. Maulvi Haqqani and his son Sirajuddin Haqqani run a number of madrassas and training camps in North Waziristan. Due to his father’s ill health, Sirajuddin Haqqani is reported to be in charge of the day-to-day operations of the movement.

The Haqqanis hail from the Zadran tribe, who are mostly based in Paktia and Khost provinces in the east of Afghanistan. “Their support base has always been in that area with a base in North Waziristan,” reads a report of the Institute for the Study of War.

The group proved its dominance in Khost area as the battles for Khost were fought in 1985-1987 by Haqqani men isolating the Soviet forces’ garrison at Khost early in the war, taking advantage of the fact that there was only one major road linking Khost with the rest of Afghanistan — the Khost-Gardez road that runs through the Satekandav Pass. In summer 1985, Haqqani gathered several thousand fighters and assaulted the city of Khost itself, overrunning Soviet forces’ outposts and requiring a significant Soviet counter-attack to save the city.

In 1987, the Soviet leadership decided to undertake a major effort to open the Khost-Gardez road long enough to get supplies in to the town and its garrison. Operation Magistral (Mainline), as it was called, was the major Soviet military effort of that year, overseen directly by Colonel General Boris Gromov, commander of Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Gromov made numerous attempts to negotiate with Haqqani and Zadran tribal elders to secure safe passage for supplies to Khost without fighting. It is not clear whether or not Haqqani himself participated in negotiations, but Zadran tribal elders certainly did and they drew out the discussions intentionally to allow time for their forces to react. Two weeks of hard fighting allowed the Soviet forces to secure the Satekandav Pass. The arrival of Soviet reinforcements and the elimination of a key insurgent base convinced Haqqani to withdraw his forces temporarily. The Soviets re-supplied the garrison and then withdrew from the area. By 1989, all Soviet forces had withdrawn from the country.

The available information reveals that the top leadership of the group consists of Jalaluddin Haqqani, Sirajuddin Haqqani, Badaruddin Haqqani – (younger brother of Sirajuddin), Sangeen Zadran, Nasiruddin Haqqani and others.

Different studies speak differently about the strength of this group as a report published in an American newspaper indicates that “they are thought to have about 4,000 to 12,000 Taliban under their command” while a 2011 report from the Combating Terrorism Centre places its strength roughly at 10,000-15,000.

The Haqqani network is considered to be the pioneer of suicide attacks in Afghanistan and tend to use mostly foreign bombers whereas the Taliban tend to rely on locals in attacks.

The following activities are being attributed to the group:

January 14, 2008: Kabul Serena Hotel attack, March 2008: Kidnapping of British journalist Sean Langan, April 27, 2008: Assassination attempts on Hamid Karzai. July 7, 2008: US intelligence blamed the network for 2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul. November 10, 2008: The Kidnapping of David Rohde, December 30, 2009: Camp Chapman May 18, 2010: Kabul bombing, February 19, 2011: Kabul Bank in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, June 28, 2011:

According to ISAF, elements of the Haqqani network provided “material support” in the 2011 attack on the Hotel Inter-Continental in Kabul. The Pentagon blamed the network for the September 10 attack. A massive truck bomb explodes outside combat outpost in Sayed Abad in Wardak province, killing five Afghans, including four civilians, and wounding 77 US soldiers. US Ambassador in Afghanistan Ryan Crocker blamed the Haqqani network for a September 12 attack on the US embassy and nearby NATO bases in Kabul. The attack lasted 19 hours and resulted in the deaths of four police officers and four civilians. At least 17 civilians and six NATO soldiers were injured. Three coalition soldiers were killed.

According to a July 2011 report published by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Centre, the network acts as a key facilitator of negotiations between the Pakistani government and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and as the “primary conduit” of many Pakistani Taliban fighters into Afghanistan.

According to US Special Envoy and Ambassador to Afghanistan (1989-1992) Peter Tomsen, the ISI has maintained its jihad era ties with Haqqanis.

====

Party Leader: NATO Backs Attacks, U.S. Bent On Breaking Up Pakistan

http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=69518&Cat=2

News International
September 26, 2011

US playing double game with Pakistan, says Muqam
Delawar Jan

PESHAWAR: Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) Provincial Chief Amir Muqam on Sunday said the US was playing a double game with Pakistan by negotiating with the Taliban itself and pressuring Pakistan for operations against them.

“The US is bent upon breaking Pakistan,” he said while speaking at the Peshawar city workers’ convention. “Attacks by militants from Afghanistan into Pakistan are being carried out with Nato’s support,” he alleged.

These attacks, he added, were intolerable He said the time had come to rid the nation of American slavery. The US, he added, was conspiring against the country and the army. “But they must know we the nation and the army are united and could ward off any threat,” he warned.

====

Has Pakistan Decided To Respond To Direct U.S. Attack?

http://paktribune.com/articles/Pakistan-Decided-to-respond-US-direct-Attack+-242788.html

Pakistan Tribune
September 26, 2011

Pakistan Decided to Respond to U.S. Direct Attack?
By Zaheerul Hassan

-General Athar Abbas acknowledged that the Pakistani intelligence…do have contacts with certain Taliban groups but don’t favour their activities. He also disclosed that certain other countries including America too have links with Haqqani and other groups. It is also added here that Haqqani and certain other groups have been created by CIA. During the 1980s, the CIA funneled arms and cash to the Haqqanis to counter Soviet forces…

The already strained Pak-U.S. relationship went further under a cloud when in mid-September, 2011 the American civil and military leadership made abrasive statements against the ISI and Pakistani security agencies. US military chief, Admiral Mike Mullen, accused the ISI of supporting the Haqqani network in carrying out an assault on the US embassy in Kabul on September 13, 2011. He further said that the Haqqani network is a powerful faction of the Taliban and a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s spy agency.

He also claimed that they have credible evidence about ISI involvement behind the June 28th attack against the Intercontinental Hotel in Kabul. During the last few days, CIA and ISI chiefs have also met each other to discuss the Haqqani Network and its presence in Pakistan. ISI Chief General Pasha strongly rejected the Americans’ allegations and denied supporting Haqqani against Americans. But, U.S. officials did not agree with the Islamabad stance and started urging Pakistan to take action.

In this connection, the U.S. defence secretary and top White House officials revealed that the U.S. believes Pakistan is “actively supporting the Haqqanis.” U.S. Officials warned that Pakistan is heading towards international isolation. “If it keeps going like this, it could end up like Syria – before the Arab spring.” President Zardari, Prime Minister Gilani, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar and the Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army strongly rejected the U.S. allegations on ISI and the Pakistan Army. Pakistan Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar lashed out at America for accusing the country’s powerful spy agency ISI of ties with terror groups, warning it risked losing Islamabad as its ally. “We have conveyed to the US that you will lose an ally.”

On September 25, 2011 an extraordinary meeting of corps commanders was held under the chairmanship of General Ashfaq Pervaiz Kayani in the GHQ. The general chaired this important meeting after cancelling his previous night’s departure to London. He was to address the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the Royal College of Defence Studies. According to an ISPR statement, a Special Corps Commanders Conference reviewed the prevailing security situation in the country.

Yesterday, US Central Command chief General James Mattis met the COAS at the General Headquarters.

General Kayani expressed grave concern over infiltration of militants from the Afghanistan side and made it clear that Pakistan would not tolerate any such incursions in the future. He asked General Mattis to make sure that the Afghan soil is not used against Pakistan.

The COAS also lodged a strong protest with Gen Mattis over the statements of US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and Admiral Mullen calling the statements contrary to ground realities.

While talking to the media, in a separate question, General Athar Abbas acknowledged that the Pakistani intelligence…do have contacts with certain Taliban groups but don’t favour their activities. He also disclosed that certain other countries including America too have links with Haqqani and other groups. It is also added here that Haqqani and certain other groups have been created by CIA. During the 1980s, the CIA funneled arms and cash to the Haqqanis to counter Soviet forces…

At the same time, American and NATO military forces physically remain unsuccessful in controlling the situation and continuously are facing defeats in fighting against Taliban. According to reliable estimates, Americans suffered heavy losses in terms of finances and loss of life in the war against terror like: (One) total cost of War in Iraq & Afghanistan since 2001 is $1,254,566,897,296, (two) Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (officially acknowledged) In America’s War on Iraq: 4,792 (three) Number of International Occupation Force Troops Slaughtered in Afghanistan: 2,718.

Therefore, before heading into the next U.S. presidential elections, the Obama administration has to start the implementation of Obama’s exit strategy since the administration needs to justify its failures in the war on terror to the general public. Thus, now American military leadership has planned to gamble on launching some physical attacks in North Waziristan against Pakistani interests and will. In fact, Obamas’ government is trying to use Pakistan as her scapegoat to hide her failures. Probably, a U.S. direct attack on Pakistan would prove a blunder and fatal for herself, since Islamabad’s top civil and military brass is not in a position to go for a “do more policy” particularly after the U.S. unilateral May 2, 2011 action in Abbottabad.

…270 drone attacks killed 2,601 persons in FATA since 2004.

Therefore, planning misadventure instead of acknowledging Pakistani sacrifices will further tarnish the U.S. image and ensure the ultimate failure of the U.S. in Asia…

American military pundits should also be mindful that Pakistan is a nuclear power and has also carried out tactical nuclear missile system tests successfully in its recent years. It has an organized, disciplined, well-trained force that is capable of striking with its full strength. In short, I would like to suggest to American leadership instead asking of “do more policy” rather should try to implement on a “roll back policy”. She must realize that Pakistan is a sovereign nuclear Islamic power that deserves to protect its interests around the globe and will never surrender to illogical US demands.

====

Poland To Host European Partnership Conference

http://en.trend.az/capital/business/1936752.html

Trend News Agency
September 26, 2011

Warsaw will host Eastern Partnership Conference

Baku: “The Eastern Partnership Conference: Towards a European Community of democracy, prosperity and a stronger civil society” will be held in Warsaw on Sept. 29, 2011.

More than 200 participants are expected to attend the international conference about the EU’s relations with its Eastern partners, including prominent representatives of EU institutions, EU member states and partner countries. Radosław Sikorski (Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland), Jerzy Buzek (President of the European Parliament), Stefan Fule (European Commissioner for Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy), David Bakradze (Chairman of the Parliament of Georgia) and Nick Clegg (Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) have confirmed their intent to attend. Others planning to attend include civil society representatives, experts on the region and 30 EaP Civil Society Forum representatives from partner countries.

Trend News Agency provides information support to the conference.

The aim of the conference is to develop recommendations for the inclusion of civil society activities in the Eastern Partnership. It is an accompanying event to the Polish EU Presidency and the Eastern Partnership summit (scheduled for Sept. 30, 2011). It is organised by the Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW, www.osw.waw.pl), the EaP Civil Society Forum (www.eap-csf.eu) and the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM, www.pism.pl) The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland is a conference partner. The conference is co-funded by the European Union.

The Eastern Partnership was launched at the initiative of Poland and Sweden at the summit in Prague in May 2009. Its goal is to deepen political cooperation and economic integration of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine with the European Union.

====

Russia Eyes Arctic Oil And Gas

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/09/25/56714048.html

Voice of Russia
September 25, 2011

Russia eyes Arctic oil, gas

       
While considering renewable energy, Russia continues to heavily rely on oil and natural gas. Its Barents Sea border agreement with Norway boosts its reserves by 5 billion tons, in terms of standard fuel equivalent. This brings its oil and gas reserves offshore to the level of those on land. The country should enjoy a plentiful supply of oil and gas for about 150 years.

Environment and Resources Minister Yuri Trutnev was speaking about this at a media forum of the United Russia party in Moscow on Sunday. He said that in 2013 Russia will approach the UN for securing exclusive economic rights to more chunks of the Arctic Shelf.

====

Categories: Uncategorized
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers