Home > Uncategorized > Kyrgyzstan: NATO Partner On The Chinese Border

Kyrgyzstan: NATO Partner On The Chinese Border

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
September 17, 2013

Secretary General says NATO is open to expand cooperation with Kyrgyzstan


NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev on Tuesday (17 September 2013) that the Alliance is open to expand its cooperation with Kyrgyzstan, as well as providing support to democratic reforms. “Kyrgyzstan is a valuable partner for NATO,” the Secretary General said. “We appreciate your commitment to dialogue and cooperation and we appreciate your commitment to develop your country’s democratic institutions.”

Mr. Fogh Rasmussen said the Alliance could expand its cooperation with Kyrgyzstan into other areas where cooperation would make a real difference. “I am confident that we can be more ambitious in our cooperation, for example, in disaster response, logistics and defence reform,” he said. The Secretary General stressed that “cooperation is also based on shared values and democratic principles. These are the essence of the Partnership for Peace. We addressed this today and I encourage you, Mr. President, to strengthen democratic institutions and ensure protection of minorities and human rights.”


The Secretary General thanked President Atambayev for his country’s cooperation in helping to build security and stability in Afghanistan. Kyrgyzstan is helping NATO’s mission in Afghanistan by facilitating the transit of NATO equipment. It also participates in the NATO-Russia Council programme to train counter-narcotics officers from Afghanistan and across the region. “We all know that a stable and secure Afghanistan will help sustain a stable and secure region,” said Mr. Fogh Rasmussen.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. September 18, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    Kyrgyz is the most security-minded “police-State” because they have the largest world’s supply of nerve-Agent. Their state was the supply hub and became the depot for storage of nerve-Agents post 1991 dissolution of Soviet Regime.

    May be interesting to ask: “why does N.A.T.O. wait until Syria’s nerve agent proves despicable that the N.A.T.O. concurs to force their presence. Similarly what is Vladimir Putin’s response to be–and IDF, too?

    No one was allowed (1981) w.i. 5 or ten Kilometers of that military and state ‘fortress’…

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: