Home > Uncategorized > “NATO By Now Includes Nearly Every European Nation”

“NATO By Now Includes Nearly Every European Nation”

Deutsche Welle
November 22, 2012

Who’s next to join the NATO alliance?

NATO by now includes nearly every European nation. Ten years since the last major expansion, four more countries in line to join. Russia, however, remains critical of the alliance’s continued expansion.

Ten years ago, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) agreed to accept seven central and eastern European countries and in 2004 those new members officially joined the alliance. At the 2002 summit in Prague then-NATO Secretary General Lord George Robertson pointed out that the new expansion was not to be understood as being directed against Russia or any other country.

“NATO has never been an exclusive organization” he said. “From 12 original countries, we’ve enlarged successively to 14, then to 15, to 16 and then in 1990 to 19. And NATO’s door is still open.”

In 1999, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary were the first three former Warsaw Pact members to join the alliance. By then, the Warsaw Pact had, like its leader the Soviet Union, disappeared. “Back in the early 1990s we would never have dreamed of one day becoming a NATO member,” Estonian Prime Minister Siim Kallas said at the Prague summit a decade ago.

The door remains open

Rasmussen said NATO’s door remains open The 2008 summit in Bucharest once again confirmed what Robertson had said in 2002 – that NATO’s door remained open. Only a few days ago, current Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said during a meeting with new Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili in Brussels that back in 2008, the alliance had agreed to offer NATO membership also to Georgia and Ukraine.

Newly elected Ivanishvili said Georgia would do everything required for…Russia and Georgia fought a brief war four years ago over a rebel province seeking independence from Tbilisi.

No say for Russia

Russia has been critical of all NATO expansion since 1990…

Russia does not have an actual say in that matter [NATO expansion to its border], said German parliamentarian Karl Lamers, currently president of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.

“The relationship between NATO and Russia is marked by dialogue and transparency, but Russia does not co-determine policy. Quite on the contrary: We’ve seen in the past that Russia has again and again complained against the expansion. I’m thinking in particular about Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,” Lamers told DW, adding that Russia’s objections did not halt the alliance’s expansion.

Ukraine no longer interested

In 2008, Ukraine was ambitious to join at some point. But since the election of pro-Russian Victor Yanukovych, the country has dropped its membership ambitions.

“Under the current president there’s no perspective for joining NATO,” Lamers explained.

But close cooperation would continue, Rasmussen said at the most recent official meeting with the Ukrainian government in spring 2012. Ukraine is, for instance, part of NATO led missions like the one in Afghanistan.

Three Balkan candidates

In spring 2009, Croatia and Albania had joined – long before a possible EU membership. The criteria for NATO are less strict than for the European Union, but prospective members do have to be stable democracies and have a civilian control over their military. Also, their military forces have to be somewhat on the level with standards of the alliance. Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Macedonia are currently working towards achieving those standards. When exactly they will join though remains unclear.

Macedonia has fulfilled the requirements for years. But as NATO member Greece objects to Macedonia’s name – as Greece has a province of the same name – and Athens has blocked membership for the former Yugoslav republic.

Ties to Serbia

Kosovo still has NATO troops stationed on it’s territory In 1999, NATO fought a war against Serbia…Relations between Belgrade and NATO are therefore still somewhat cool.

NATO also does not accept any members who would bring unresolved territorial disputes into the alliance. That means that first of all, Serbia would have to normalize its ties with Kosovo. Currently, Belgrade does not yet recognize Pristina’s independence and there still are NATO-led troops stationed in Kosovo.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. rosemerry
    November 23, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    NATO, as the main threat to any chance of world peace, should be abandoned at once. It is attempting to encircle China and Russia, pretending that they are some sort of threat. It accepts members just to grow in power and to ensure polarity and disagreements escalate in the world.

  2. November 24, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    all democratic nation should trust in russia and china, its authocratic and totalitarian govt never be trusted. What else you can do? is to prepare and get ready. For tomorrows success are belong to the people and nation who plan and prepared it NOW..

    • richardrozoff
      November 25, 2012 at 3:26 pm

      Let’s see what you intended to say: Russia and China are bad. Inherently bad.
      The U.S. and its vassals and tributaries are good. Intrinsically good.
      “Prepare and get ready” for war against Russia and China?
      That means world war – in the nuclear age.

  3. gary semenchuk
    November 27, 2012 at 1:47 am

    Why would Russia, Bielorussia and Ukraine suspect NATO? It has moved up to their borders and they are the only major European countries that are non-members. If NATO doesn’t attack them, then whom?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: