Home > Uncategorized > Broader Than Syria: U.S. Plans For Greater Middle East Dominance From Morocco To Pakistan

Broader Than Syria: U.S. Plans For Greater Middle East Dominance From Morocco To Pakistan

Voice of Russia
October 8, 2012

The US and its allies are wary of Syrian backfire
Boris Volkhonsky

====

[Recent] reports only demonstrate the double-minded policy the US is pursuing in the Middle East (in fact, everywhere). While trying to position itself as a “good cop” it encourages all kinds of proxies to do the dirty job of a “bad cop”.

The case of Syria…should be looked upon in a much broader context than just one particular country-case. It is an integral part of a broader assault in which the ultimate objective is not Syria or Bashar al-Assad, but Iran, which, in turn, is the last remaining obstacle in the region for the US to establish its dominance over the Great Middle East from Morocco to Pakistan.

====

On Saturday, the New York Times published a lengthy article dedicated to the ambiguous situation in which the Persian Gulf monarchies have found themselves in regard to their aid to Syrian rebels.

“For months,” states the paper, “Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been funneling money and small arms to Syria’s rebels but have refused to provide heavier weapons, like shoulder-fired missiles.”

One of the reasons they refrain from doing so is the fact that they have been discouraged by the United States, which fears the heavier weapons could end up in the hands of terrorists.

As a result, the story goes on, the rebels have just enough weapons to maintain a stalemate, the war grinds on and more jihadist militants join the fray every month.

Still, Saudis and Qataris do not abandon hope that they will persuade their trans-Atlantic mentors and the latter will finally give their approval to arming the Syrian rebels with heavier weapons, because this, according to Qatari state minister for foreign affairs Khalid al-Attiyah, “has to happen.”

Also on Saturday, the Associated Press reported that the US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who was visiting Peru, expressed his worries that the continued exchange of artillery fire between Syria and Turkey raises additional concerns that the conflict may escalate and spread to neighboring countries.

Indeed, both reports only demonstrate the double-minded policy the US is pursuing in the Middle East (in fact, everywhere). While trying to position itself as a “good cop” it encourages all kinds of proxies to do the dirty job of a “bad cop”.

The case of Syria, therefore, should be looked upon in a much broader context than just one particular country-case. It is an integral part of a broader assault in which the ultimate objective is not Syria or Bashar al-Assad, but Iran, which, in turn, is the last remaining obstacle in the region for the US to establish its dominance over the Great Middle East from Morocco to Pakistan.

Achieving this goal needs a lot of evasive maneuvering, and this is where Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and Israel come into the picture. Harnessing the four so distinctly different countries into one carriage of US Middle Eastern policy may seem a difficult task, but the common Iranian scarecrow helps a lot.

In fact, for the US there are several obstacles that do not allow it to openly support arming Syrian rebels with heavy weapons. One (the minor one) is the traditional intention of the modern Western governments to appear as humane and compliant with the “universal values” and principles of “human rights” as possible even when they launch the bloodiest aggression against those who allegedly do not observe those values and principles. But this, after all, can be disregarded.

What is more important is the fact that the direct US involvement in Syrian internal matters would become untimely at this particular moment. While the war in Afghanistan remains one of the biggest pains in the neck of the current administration and seriously mars the prospects of Barack Obama’s reelection, stepping into another venture in the volatile region would only add to the US public’s irritation. This is something that President Obama and his cronies cannot afford.

And the third consideration relates to the fact that most probably Washington strategists have begun to realize that the foes of their foes do not necessarily become their friends. The recent events in Libya where the Islamist rioters attacked the US embassy and killed Ambassador Chris Stevens is the most outstanding of such backfires.

The countries of the region which either go on insisting that Syrian rebels should be supplied with heavier weapons, or venture on direct military actions against the Syrian government. But while toying with the idea that they can “prevent the weapon from falling into the wrong hands” and may be able to control its future use, those countries should take into account only one possibility. If a major fire flares up, the neighbors now so recklessly fanning it will inevitably be affected themselves.

Boris Volkhonsky, senior research fellow, Russian Institute for Strategic Studies

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. rosemerry
    October 9, 2012 at 6:53 am

    The US solution to any problem is force, violence or locking people up in prisons.
    Is the world better off??????

  2. abbas ali
    October 9, 2012 at 11:06 am

    The worst of the problem is allowing the fanatics of Al Qaeda and their ilk to hold sway over Syria, and Iraq, then US Foreign Policy would not be worth a dime. The Taliban in Pakistan, and other insurgents in Afghanistan, plus the turmoil in Libya, Yemen, Bahrain and the government in Egypt will make a nightmare for them; besides, the people of Turkey and Jordan will also not keep quiet. One thing will be certain, Israel’s Zionist regime’s days are numbered, Nuclear weapons or no Nuclear weapons. They are the main instigators of these wars in the Middle East, well, their regime will not be around for long to cheer.

  3. Alex. Illi
    October 9, 2012 at 11:18 am

    They already feel the heat of the fire that they have stoked up, unbearably drawing closer to themselves. Fire is looming upon Al Thani, Erdogan, Al Saud, Nethanjahu, Hollande, Clinton and their like. They thought they could funnel it once more, direct and divert and eventually extinguish it, but now they fear that might have been a lightheaded mistake, owed to all-too-easy past ‘successes” and the hubris assuring them that they would be able to pull off the same tricks again and again, in ever more rapid succession.
    While the embers of the latest fires they laid are still smouldering near more dry kindling, they thought they could turn their back to spark off the next arson. Sometime they might find themselves engulfed by their own flames towering over them in the night.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: