Home > Uncategorized > NATO: What’s In A Name?

NATO: What’s In A Name?

Global Occupy News
June 25, 2012

NATO: What’s in a name?
By ‘Snake’ Arbusto

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has now expanded to include South America. And into countries with no Atlantic coast at all, let alone on the North Atlantic. Unless you count the Caribbean…

Rick Rozoff, in a post entitled “NATO Expands Military Network To All Continents,” reports on the recent Strategic Military Partnership Conference held in Zagreb and reveals that:

The South American nation(s) were not identified, but NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Admiral James Stavridis, recently identified El Salvador in Central America and Colombia in South America, respectively, as current and future NATO partners and troop contributors…

Of course, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are members of the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, a NATO partner. And Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Tunisia (and soon, possibly, Libya) are members of the Mediterranean Dialogue, also a NATO partner. None of them have an Atlantic coast either. And Admiral Stavridis, Rozoff reports, also told Congress in March that Brazil and India also were potential NATO partnership states. India?

Rozoff points out that the inclusion of South America marks the crossing of a new threshold for NATO: It now has members and partners on all six inhabited continents, accounting for over a third of the nations in the world.

NATO’s name is likely to become something of a PR handicap if it continues this expansion. We hereby launch a challenge to our many readers: come up with a new name to fit the existing acronym. A friend has already jokingly suggested “New American Terrorism Overseas,” but of course he was engaging in irony. We all know that NATO is an international organization, that its purpose is peace and the protection of civilian populations, and that it is not in the business of advancing the cause of US foreign policy and arms sales for US manufacturers…Though we have to admit that there is at least a hint of that in NATO’s language: As NATO has remarked of the Connected Forces Initiative, it is “aimed at ensuring that NATO retains and builds on the valuable gains of interoperability among Allies and partners as a result of NATO’s recent operations.”

Still, Rozoff’s article should be read by anyone who finds it curious that NATO even continues to exist, let alone expand. And everyone with a nervous system capable of engaging with the outside world should read his last paragraph:

The steady expansion of NATO military partnerships and operations around the world, which now include all populated continents, has no precedent in history. This is the first attempt to establish an international military alliance that is capable of and prepared to intervene in any nation and region it chooses to for the geopolitical benefit of its leading member states.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. June 25, 2012 at 2:43 pm

    NATO should be RATO

    • June 26, 2012 at 7:29 am

      No fair! I asked for a redefinition of the name, not a new acronym. Like New Allies Take Over, or Not A Treaty Organization, or No Armageddon ‘Til Ordered.
      Somebody should be able to top those, for God’s sake!

      Aw, okay, we give up. What’s RATO?

      • richardrozoff
        June 26, 2012 at 12:10 pm

        Years ago, given who its real powers are, I reworked the acronym as Nordic Aryan Teutonic Order.
        But there are more and better around, I’m sure.
        Kudos on your article of the other day.

      • June 27, 2012 at 2:28 pm

        RATO? You don’t know what’s RATO? Okay, I’ll tell you:
        Ridiculous Assholes Totally Obnoxious.

      • June 27, 2012 at 3:25 pm


      • June 27, 2012 at 6:35 pm

        Naturally Abhorrent Totalitarian Objectives

  2. greydogg
    June 25, 2012 at 4:48 pm

    Similarly, if you go to the IMF website and read their ‘about’ paragraph, you’ll find a similarly disturbing, inverted definition of who they are:

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 188 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world.

    But, the head of the IMF, the loathsome Christine Lagarde, recently stated that she felt more sorry for the children of Niger than the starving Greek children, because the Greeks don’t pay taxes. It’s hard to imagine that old bag making that statement with a straight face for a couple of reasons. First, Ms. Lagarde pays no taxes herself, on a very hefty salary. Secondly, what has the IMF done to relieve the suffering of the children of Niger? Not a damn thing.

  3. June 26, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    richardrozoff :
    Years ago, given who its real powers are, I reworked the acronym as Nordic Aryan Teutonic Order.
    But there are more and better around, I’m sure.
    Kudos on your article of the other day.

    My son just suggested “Now Advancing Towards Oblivion.” Not bad.
    Thanks for the compliment and thanks more than anything for your great work.

    • June 27, 2012 at 7:23 am

      I think a combo of Rick and Kathleen’s submissions work:
      Nefarious Aryan Terrorist Organization

      • June 27, 2012 at 1:39 pm

        Now Arming Terrorist Organizations

      • July 2, 2012 at 8:48 am

        A new entry just came in: Not Against Total Opportunism

  4. Kathleen
    June 26, 2012 at 11:47 pm

    Nefarious Airforce To Oligarchy
    Numbskull Armchair Terrorist Organization

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: