Drone Strikes “Barbarous, Unjust and Counter-Productive”
October 3, 2012
“Drone attacks in violation of international laws’
* US peace team member terms drones ‘personal execution device’ of US president
* Group aims at making all possible efforts to stop US government from illegal use of force
By Tanveer Ahmed
People in the United States and across the globe have to be told that the policy and the steps undertaken by the US and NATO were “barbarous, unjust and counter-productive”.
[T]he central vision of US offensive policy, as clearly manifested in drone strategy, was to kill others without risking the lives of their own soldiers.
ISLAMABAD: Speakers and participants at a seminar on Tuesday agreed with a delegation of US anti-war activists visiting Pakistan at the Institute of Policy Studies that the US drone strikes in Pakistan were a clear violation of international laws, human rights and depict an absence of conscience among the strategy leaders in both the US and Pakistan.
Mary Ann Wright, member of the delegation and former US Army colonel and diplomat, termed drones the “personal execution device” of the US president and said that President Obama was directly responsible for the US drone operations in any part of the world, which were sanctioned by him every week.
She said that drone strikes were in violation of international laws, even the US constitution and laws itself, and all the concepts of the conduct of war formed in the wake of the World War II.
“Unfortunately, our president has chosen the role of chief executioner in United States”, she deplored.
Urging a greater coalition of peace activists at the global level against drones and the so-called war on terror, Wright said that there were still people in the US Army who abhor the US policies and strategies and a public movement would give such persons the courage to speak up.
The head of the US peace delegation, Medea Benjamin, said that their group aimed at making all possible efforts to stop the US government from the illegal use of force. People in the United States and across the globe have to be told that the policy and the steps undertaken by the US and NATO were “barbarous, unjust and counter-productive”. She said that they were considering a hunger strike in front of the US embassy in Pakistan to bring the atrocities to the limelight.
Seminar participants observed that once it has become clear that the political and military establishments in Pakistan and the US were “barren of conscience” with respect to the loss of lives and civil liberties in FATA, the people will have to stand up to express their concerns in every legitimately possible way to force the authorities to act sanely.
It was highlighted that while the movements for peace in the US have been vocal and bold, it is high time that the people of Pakistan too should raise their voices. The people in tribal areas were left at the mercy of militaries who know nothing but to bombard. Tribal people do not and did not have any say in whatever has happened or was happening to them, through them or in their name.
Concluding the session, IPS associate and former secretary of foreign affairs Akram Zaki said that the mission and objective of peace activities should definitely focus on drones, but in a wider canvas should aim at the elimination of the war in Afghanistan.
He noted that the central vision of US offensive policy, as clearly manifested in drone strategy, was to kill others without risking the lives of their own soldiers. Zaki was of the view that the freedom of media in the US was a myth, just like the introduction of democracy in the Third World. He said that the national security doctrine in the US did not allow media to report freely on the US atrocities in the so-called war on terror and its drone operations that have killed and maimed thousands of innocent people. He deplored that when drone operations were initiated in Pakistan it was in connivance with the then-government, and unfortunately the present democratic government was also toeing the same line.