Home > Uncategorized > U.S. In the Thick of China-Japan Island Dispute

U.S. In the Thick of China-Japan Island Dispute

Beijing Review
September 24, 2012

Play fair

====

[T]he Pentagon chief reiterated U.S. commitments to Japan while meeting with Japanese officials, saying that the U.S.-Japan Mutual Cooperation and Security Treaty applied to the Diaoyu Islands, indicating that Washington has an obligation to fight alongside Tokyo if the territories in question are attacked.

[T]he U.S. military and strategic alliance with Japan has emboldened the latter to lay claims on a territory upon which it holds no sovereignty at all. The United States has thus taken a biased stance over the Sino-Japanese contention for decades.

====


USS George Washington nuclear-powered supercarrier, with homeport in Yokosuka, Japan

When two people quarrel over an old feud, how is a close friend of one of the parties involved likely to react? He may take the side of his friend, angering the other party and possibly leading to a bigger fight in the end. Or he can try to be a peacemaker, persuading the two to calm down and settle their differences in a more conciliatory and effective manner. Clearly, the latter is the right attitude to take.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta planned to play the role of mediator in the current territorial dispute between China and Japan. Before he paid a visit to China, he made an unexpected detour to Tokyo, where he remarked that the United States would not take sides on the issue of the Diaoyu Islands, but wished for China and Japan to exercise restraint and solve the dispute by diplomatic means. However, the Pentagon chief reiterated U.S. commitments to Japan while meeting with Japanese officials, saying that the U.S.-Japan Mutual Cooperation and Security Treaty applied to the Diaoyu Islands, indicating that Washington has an obligation to fight alongside Tokyo if the territories in question are attacked.

With Japanese authorities’ arbitrary move to “nationalize” China’s Diaoyu Islands, tensions between China and Japan have been rising, marked by a looming possibility of further clashes or even confrontations. China and Japan are major players in many global and regional economic and political issues, so peace and cooperation between the two countries will only help the Asia-Pacific region and the world at large. It would be in the best interest for the two nations, as well as the United States, to work toward preventing the crisis from escalating.

A growing number of Chinese citizens believe the United States has sowed the seeds of the feud between China and Japan. Its unilateral and illegal return of the jurisdiction over the islands to Japan, in violation of legal-binding global agreements, has resulted in de facto Japanese control of the islands. Furthermore, the U.S. military and strategic alliance with Japan has emboldened the latter to lay claims on a territory upon which it holds no sovereignty at all. The United States has thus taken a biased stance over the Sino-Japanese contention for decades. Chinese people across the world are watching to see whether it will again adopt a partial approach.

China is determined to safeguard its territorial sovereignty and will never make even the slightest concessions under any circumstances. To defuse the rising tensions in East Asia, Japanese authorities have no choice but to revoke the absurd and unjustifiable act of “buying” the Chinese territory.

During the past week, demonstrations have been staged in a number of Chinese cities to protest Japan’s territorial assertion. Some demonstrations have regrettably turned violent. These irrational expressions of anger must end, Japan must act responsibly and the United States should remain impartial, so that all sides can play fair.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. rosemerry
    September 24, 2012 at 6:02 am | #1

    Obviously the USA has not got enough wars, and takes the side of puppet Japan, which is the only nation devastated by nuclear bombs (by this same “fried” which now occupies Okinawa) to provoke China.

  2. Michael
    September 24, 2012 at 10:42 pm | #2

    As the story goes two men were discussing DEBT:
    “How do you handle your debt? the first man asked
    “It depends”, second man replied.
    “Depends on what?” first man asked again
    “Depends if it is OLD or NEW debt”
    “How?”
    “Well, I let new debt become old debt”
    And What do you do with old debt?”
    “I forget about it!”

    Estimated U. S. DEBT is around $ 16 000 000 000 000 at this time of which over
    $ 7 000 000 000 000 in combined debt and interest U.S. owe to CHINA. That is almost 50%.
    It would be much easier to forget the debt to China by orchestrating international crisis and
    blame China for it while never having any intention to pay it back anyway!

    In addition, killing the lender may be the option disguised as “U.S.-Japan Mutual Cooperation and Security Treaty”!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 438 other followers

%d bloggers like this: