Home > Uncategorized > Washington Wants Pentagon And NATO To Have Carte Blanche In Syria

Washington Wants Pentagon And NATO To Have Carte Blanche In Syria

Voice of Russia
September 19, 2012

The Friends of Syria: whose foes are they?
Pyotr Iskanderov

====

Washington wants the [UN] envoy to have no influence on military and political issues in Syria, giving the US and NATO a carte blanche.

So, the West claims that all it wants is to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in Syria and enhance democracy there, but the very nature of the anti-Assad coalition puts in doubt these good intentions.

====

The Friends of Syria group is to meet in the Netherlands Thursday. This group of countries and bodies supports Syria’s opposition in its struggle to oust President Bashar al-Assad.

The session will be held amid escalating conflict in the country and a new UN envoy for Syria, ex-Algeria’s Foreign Minister, Lakhdar Brahimi, taking up his office.

Our political observer Pyotr Iskenderov comments on the situation.

The Friends of Syria was initiated by France’s leader Nicolas Sarkozy who openly spoke about his intention to apply the Libyan scenario to Damascus. Before striking Libya, NATO gathered a collection of countries and organizations to ensure support of its actions. Then, France, the UK and the US were strongly backed by the Arab League, mainly Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Those who masterminded the operation knew that if it had been initiated by Arab countries, this would have sparked a conflict between the West and the Muslim world.

The administration of Barack Obama contrasted to George W. Bush is pursuing a more exquisite foreign policy. It keeps emphasizing that after withdrawing its troops from Iraq, all it cares about is Afghanistan. In other hot spots, like Libya or Syria, the US prefers to operate through its allies, mainly France, the UK or the Arab League, being behind the operation.

This worked in Libya and could well work with Syria but it’s more complicated to mount military interference in Damascus than in Libya back in 2011. This time there is no UN Security Council resolution which has at least an subtext allowing an operation. In the case of Libya it was a no-fly zone imposed by the UN, but this time Russia and China vetoed UN resolutions against Syria. So, the move was taken at creating a broad though quite vague coalition of countries, activists and bodies to internationally legitimize pressure put on Damascus.

Recently, Syria has attempted to reinforce ties with other international unions, less broad but more diverse. In the run-up to the Netherlands meeting, a contact group on Syria met in Cairo. It features Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey which treat Assad’s regime differently and are all key players in the region.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi proposed to send the group’s own observers to seek a peaceful resolution of the conflict without foreign intervention.

It was quite timely, as in August the UN and the West decided to withdraw its observers from Syria.

However, the West obviously will do its best to prevent countries which it doesn’t control from monitoring the situation in Syria.

As some UN leaks reveal, delegates from the West were the ones skeptical about the necessity of a UN envoy at all.

Richard Gowan of New York University stated:

“I doubt that any U.N. envoy can really prevent the current conflict from getting worse, although the U.N. has an absolute obligation to keep up efforts to get humanitarian aid into the country alongside the Red Cross and Red Crescent.”

This means that Washington wants the envoy to have no influence on military and political issues in Syria, giving the US and NATO a carte blanche.

So, the West claims that all it wants is to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in Syria and enhance democracy there, but the very nature of the anti-Assad coalition puts in doubt these good intentions.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Michael
    September 19, 2012 at 10:07 pm | #1

    “Washington wants Pentagon and NATO to have Carte Blanche in Syria.”
    That is of no surprise to anyone:
    New maps of the Middle East have been drawn to enlarge and reward loyal stooges:

    1.Turkey that would eliminate ALL Kurdish ethnic lands from seeking statehood, annexing, Northern and N-E Syria, Northern and N-E Iraq and N-W Iran,

    2.Israel annexing parts of the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula, Syrian Golan Heights and additional parts of S-W Syria, while incorporating occupied Palestinian West Bank territories into Israel “proper”,

    3.Azerbaijan by annexing Armenian Nagorno-Karabakh enclave and Azerbaijan Province in Northern Iran,

    4.Georgia by annexing Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia having de facto forceful return to “Mother Georgia” or cruel “Father Saakashvili”;

    For this plan to succeed, NATO led by Pentagon needs “carte blanche” citing security concerns, R2P, fear of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, human rights protection and MANY, MANY BOMBS to bomb the whole Region into Bloody “freedom & democracy”
    Neo-Colonial and Imperial style!

  2. Charles
    September 20, 2012 at 12:42 am | #2

    We are watching the beginning of the end.I have been shouting, along with others that humanity will not,can not survive a thermonuclear war..It amazes me that with all the intelligence in mankind ,that for the entire time of our existence we can not get pass this level of self destruction.There will be no room for an after thought this time around.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 438 other followers

%d bloggers like this: