Home > Uncategorized > U.S. Dilemma In Encircling And Targeting China

U.S. Dilemma In Encircling And Targeting China

Global Times
July 17, 2012

Clinton trip highlights weak points of US return to Asia
By Liu Zongyi*

====

Countries like the Philippines and Vietnam attempt to grab islands and waters which don’t belong to them by riding the back of the tiger. They hope to get massive military assistance from the US, which the US can’t afford to provide.

India and Japan have their own strategic considerations. The US sees India, the biggest democracy in the world, as a mainstay of its Asia-Pacific strategy and a chess piece to balance China.

====

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a trip encircling China recently. From Japan to Mongolia then to Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, Clinton mainly focused on three things: backing Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines in disputes with China over maritime territorial sovereignty, balancing China’s economic influence in Asia by enhancing trade and economic ties with Southeast Asian countries, and promoting support for democracy and human rights as the core of US Asian strategy while attacking China’s development model.

Her every topic targeted China by insinuation. It seems the US is tightening its encirclement of China, but on the other hand we can see the weakness of the US “back to Asia” strategy.

The Obama administration’s “back to Asia” strategy covers political and military fields as well as trade and the economy. But the strategy seemingly is gradually losing its edge.

From the military perspective, in recent years the US has enhanced its deployment in the Asia-Pacific region and interfered in territorial disputes between China and relevant countries. The South China Sea disputes and the Diaoyu Islands dispute have been intensified as the US wedges in. But the US aims at checking China by taking advantage of these disputes rather than directly confronting China. Getting involved in an armed conflict with China is the least desirable option.

But things won’t happen as the US wants. Countries like the Philippines and Vietnam attempt to grab islands and waters which don’t belong to them by riding the back of the tiger. They hope to get massive military assistance from the US, which the US can’t afford to provide.

India and Japan have their own strategic considerations. The US sees India, the biggest democracy in the world, as a mainstay of its Asia-Pacific strategy and a chess piece to balance China. However, India has clearly demonstrated that its policy approach toward China should be a balance of competition and cooperation, which greatly frustrates the US.

On the Diaoyu Islands issue, the US claims the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan is applicable to the Diaoyu Islands. But it also states it won’t adopt any stand in the dispute. The US takes an ambiguous attitude and hopes to maintain tension between China and Japan. Meanwhile, it worries that extreme right-wing Japanese politicians might unscrupulously trigger an armed conflict.

As for most East Asian countries, they neither want to see instability caused by the US Asian strategy nor to choose sides between China and the US. All these suggest that the US is facing a dilemma.

Clinton’s Asian tour mainly focused on promoting trade and economic relations, catering to some Asian countries’ pleasure. Clinton visited Southeast Asian countries like Laos and Cambodia to enhance economic assistance to these countries. The US hopes to block the economic integration of East Asia and compete with China for economic influence. But if the US could really shift its competition focus with China from the political and military fields to the economic field, this would benefit regional stability and prosperity in East Asia.

Enhancing economic and trade ties could be taken as an insightful strategic choice, but value diplomacy has been outdated. The empty remarks on democracy by Clinton and attacks on China’s development model mirror the weak US economy and its stranded politics. Realizing democracy needs certain conditions. However, an undisputable fact is that many countries fell into chaos as the US imposed its democratic model on them.

Some countries become victims of populism after adopting the democratic system, like Mongolia, which is rich in natural resources while greatly lags behind economically.

Even developed Western countries are deeply mired in financial and economic crises because social and economic reform cannot be promoted due to factionalism.

China’s development model is not sound, but China is on the path of economic and social reform and development, which makes the Chinese model more attractive against the backdrop of the global economic crisis.

The US Asian strategy has its deficiencies and constraints from military, economic and ideological perspectives. More questions and doubts will be poured out on the sustainability of the US “back to Asia” strategy.

China advocates establishing a new type of relationship between China and the US in which the overall pattern cannot be influenced by specific problems. Clinton also stated that the US is willing to have constructive relations with China in a meeting with China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi in Phnom Penh, Cambodia recently. Avoiding conflicts is the first step. The Sino-US relationship should develop based on mutual respect, mutual promotion, and peaceful competition.

*The author is a research fellow of the Center for South Asia Studies at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Michael
    July 17, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    “Do not bite the hand that feeds you” and “Do not kill the goose that lays golden eggs” are applicable in Sino-U.S. relations, unless Hillarious trip to overly U.S. bombed Laos completely darkened already dark view of certain Secretary. That plus burqa in
    oppressive heat will have disastrous effects on this particular relationship!.

  2. rosemerry
    July 17, 2012 at 10:02 pm

    “Avoiding conflicts is the first step.” Of course, we have noticed this as the USA exerts full spectrum dominance, refuses any sort of negotiation, insults any country refusing to be a puppet, even changes names of geographic features to insult countries (the Persian Gulf becomes Arabian).

  3. Charles
    July 17, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    It is shameful.Our foriegn policy and our reputation has gone all the way to hell.We have a
    president that is a Nobel peace prize winner leading the largest assault on other counties
    since wwii.We are instigating and organizing conflicts continually while occupping areas we
    should not be in.Nobody trusts us any more so we threaten and intimidate.Our drive towards
    wwiii is almost complete.And the beneficiaries will be directly responsible for the deaths of
    thousands of our men and women for the benefit of bankers who have used our country for
    years to enrich themselves because our politicians have lost their way and money,the selling
    of their souls are more important than love of country,family, and GOD

  4. Michael
    July 17, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    Lets hope Mrs Clinton decides to come back to Laos really soon. Hopefully, she may decide to jog and vent that built up aggression and share it with one of many U.S. unexploded ordinances that to date handicap one of the poorest Nations in the World!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 505 other followers

%d bloggers like this: