Home > Uncategorized > What’s Behind NATO Reaction To Downed Turkish Jet?

What’s Behind NATO Reaction To Downed Turkish Jet?

Voice of Russia
June 26, 2012

What’s behind NATO’s reaction to downed Turkish jet?
Igor Siletsky

Although NATO is not considering military action over the shooting down of a Turkish fighter jet in Syria, what happened is unacceptable and deserves condemnation, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after a NATO emergency meeting on Syria. His statement indicates NATO’s reluctance to use military force against Damascus.

On June 22, Syrian troops shot down a Turkish jet fighter. Syria insists that the plane violated its airspace and was destroyed over its territorial waters not far from the Latakia province. The pilots have not been found. Syrian commanders say they acted in full compliance with the law.

Turkey, which initially acknowledged that its F-4 fighter jet had crossed into Syrian airspace, now claims that it was in international airspace the moment the attack occurred.

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu admitted soon after the incident that the plane had crossed the Syrian border 15 minutes before the attack. Later, Ankara retracted this statement and took a tougher stance. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan recalled that Syrian helicopters had intruded into Turkish airspace on five occasions and that no retaliatory action followed. He made clear this would not be the case any more.

Some analysts think that the plane incident aimed at probing the combat readiness of the Syrian air defense forces.

On the other hand, it could be used as a pretext for a military operation against Syria. But NATO’s reaction to the incident makes the latter scenario unlikely.

Russian analyst Alexander Khramchikhin thinks that the latest hollow statement from Brussels is a sign that NATO is not planning any military intervention in Syria at least for the time being.

Political scientist Sergei Markov argues that intervention has actually started. Foreign mercenaries are fighting on the opposition’s side, and Syrian refugee camps in Turkey are being used to train armed opposition fighters.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. AR
    June 27, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    What’s behind the reaction of NATO (i.e. the American Empire and its stooges) is transparently obvious: the USA and NATO are predictably seizing upon this incident as a kind of Gulf of Tonkin-style war provocation to ratchet up their war of aggression against Syria.

    This is the way that most American wars of aggression always start: invent a pretext (like Al-Queda or Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction) or stage some provocation (Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Northwoods, Sept. 11th) in order to justify your military attack against a sovereign nation.

    Even the most jingoistic American fascist/patriot cannot deny this reality.

  2. Michael
    June 27, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    June 26, 2012: NATO resorted to semi-diplomacy in the light of Mr Putin’s visit to Israel, Occupied Palestinian Territories and Jordan. NATO’s statement however, ended with a veiled threat to Syria:
    “Next time you do the same, we will strike without warning!”
    In reality WAR of AGGRESSION is in place with U.S, Saudi, French and Qatari heavy armed mercenaries and spies softening Syria’s DEFENSES from the inside!
    U.S. media propaganda war has been going on for the last 15 months or so led by infamous busy bodies like Hitlery von Killington!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: