Home > Uncategorized > Syria Strategy Looks Like A Bloody Repeat

Syria Strategy Looks Like A Bloody Repeat

Chronicle Herald
June 18, 2012

Syria strategy looks like bloody repeat
Scott Taylor

Now that a United Nations official has declared the situation in Syria to be a civil war, it is legitimate for the western media to refer to the anti-regime forces as rebels.

Up until this juncture, those Syrians participating in the armed uprising, which began in March, 2011, were categorized as “pro-democracy demonstrators” or simply civilians. In turn, the security forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad have been labelled as monsters, goons, thugs and baby-killers.

Since the outset, the western powers, led by the U.S. and a cheerleading Canada, have declared their objective to be regime change in Syria.

Thus far, Canada’s position has entailed the tightening of sanctions, expulsion of diplomats and Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird screaming, “Assad must go!” at the now-empty Syrian Embassy in Ottawa.

In the black-and-white world of propaganda, this demonization of the Assad regime requires a counter-balance — lionizing the brave rebel forces who dare oppose him.

One problem with that is the fact that after 15 months of violent revolt, there isn’t a single pre-eminent leader emerging to unite the Syrian opposition under a single banner.

Instead, it is becoming clear that the loose coalition of rebel forces is a fractious collection based on tribal-ethnic loyalties and religious divisions. As Assad represents a secular platform, many of his enemies are in fact Islamic fundamentalists.

While that fact should automatically give one pause for thought, thinking is for sissies when the war drums are pounding — and John Baird ain’t no sissy. “Assad must go!”

One would think it would be virtually impossible to portray Islamic fundamentalists in a favourable light, especially after Canada has seen 158 killed and close to 2,000 wounded or injured battling similar fanatics in Afghanistan over the past decade.

Rick Hillier, the former chief of defence staff, referred to such individuals as “scumbags and murderers.” He denounced their tactic of employing improvised explosive devices as “cowardly.”

Now, even as our NATO allies continue to take mounting casualties in Afghanistan, western reporters embedded with Syrian rebel forces are painting the Islamic fundamentalists as heroic freedom fighters.

Last week, a report by David Enders, of the American media outlet McClatchy Newspapers, revealed that the Syrian rebels are using explosively formed penetrators to knock out Assad’s armoured vehicles. It was noted that these same penetrators were the bane of U.S. forces during their occupation of neighbouring Iraq.

Again, this might make one contemplate the possibility that Assad is not beyond reason when he claims to be combating “foreign fighters bent on establishing an Islamic republic.”

After all, this is the same type of enemy the Americans repeatedly claimed to be fighting in Iraq, and it appears they are using the same tactics and weaponry.

That would complicate things though, so it is best to just bellow: “Assad must go!”

Enders also reported that the rebels are now receiving a large influx of ammunition and weapons, presumed to be flowing across the Turkish border. This fact was somewhat contentious, as the rebels wish to continue being portrayed as defenceless underdogs by the western media.

However, as Enders wrote, “the improved supply of weapons to the rebels is clearly evident, both to reporters travelling in rebel-held areas and in the rising death toll among Syrian security forces in clashes with the rebels.”

Now there is word that Russia may supply Assad with helicopter gunships so that his security forces might regain the upper hand.

This has prompted demands from the western powers for the UN to authorize a no-fly zone over Syria, which would allow NATO’s air force to tip the balance in favour of the rebels, as they did in Libya.

That strategy, of course, brings us to look at the ongoing violence and instability in Libya these days, where tribes and militias are still battling for control in the post-Gadhafi power vacuum.

One other suggestion put forward was to furnish the Syrian rebels with sophisticated ground-to-air missiles so they could defeat the Russian helicopters in the same way the Afghan mujahedeen defeated the Soviets in the 1980s.

Yeah. That couldn’t possibly backfire on us, could it?

Scott Taylor is editor of Esprit de Corps.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. rosemerry
    June 18, 2012 at 7:30 pm | #1

    John Baird, the ignorant, undiplomatic Zionist puppet?

  2. Michael
    June 18, 2012 at 8:41 pm | #2

    Executioners of “New World Order” have always used same SCENARIO:
    “The GOOD ( U.S. puppet or CIA enlisted turncoats) versus BAD:
    -in Croatia (Neo fascist puppet Tudjman), 1991-1995
    -in Bosnia (Saudi/Wahhabi puppet Neo-Islamist Izetbegovic), 1991-1995
    -in Serbian Province of Kosovo (KLA/ Al Qaida & CIA enabled Terrorists led by criminal H. Thachi) 1999 – present,
    -In Libya (Anti Gaddafi TNC CIA, Neo Islamists and Al Qaida Terrorists), 2011-present,
    -in Syria ( Neo-Islamists, CIA, Al Qaida, Saudi Arabia and Persian Golf financed TERRORISTS), 2011-present………..

  3. Kathleen
    June 19, 2012 at 12:45 am | #3

    I like the use of the black and white metaphor to describe the NATO intervention cover stories. It is good to paint in some shades of gray to get beyond the cover story. Anywhere from 3000 – 5000 has been quoted for the security forces killed in Syria. How to confirm the true number is another question, but one day it becomes historical fact. This source has it at “more than 2500.” http://blogs.aljazeera.net/liveblog/topic/syria-153

    The parallel to the province of Kosovo and Metohija is interesting to note. The KLA (hardly gentle protestors either) killed dozens of police officers in Kosovo, including FRY government aligned Albanians as well as civilian Albanians with no KLA interest.

    It is enough to make one wonder – what would happen in any given western country should “protestors” take similar actions, bear similar arms and commit similar atrocities, in terms of police response.

  4. AR
    June 19, 2012 at 3:04 pm | #4

    It is enough to make one wonder – what would happen in any given western country should “protestors” take similar actions, bear similar arms and commit similar atrocities, in terms of police response.

    These Western protestors would be demonized as terrorists or bomb-throwing radicals, and they would be summarily crushed by force using not only the police but also US national guard and even regular US army if necessary. The media would regurgitate the Western regime’s propaganda and the vast majority of the public would support its actions.

    There were be no UN sanctions, “peace” plans, or calls for NATO bombing or military intervention.

    Of course, such force has already been used against peaceful protestors in the West such as the recent NATO summitt in Chicago, the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, and the numerous “anti-globalization” protests since the 1990s.

    Such is the world of Western imperial double standards that we live in today.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 439 other followers

%d bloggers like this: