Home > Uncategorized > South China Sea As The New Middle East

South China Sea As The New Middle East

Voice of Russia
April 17, 2012

South China Sea as the New Middle East
Boris Volkhonsky

On Monday, 7,000 U.S. and Philippine troops started military exercises in the South China Sea near the disputed Scarborough Shoal. The drill began only a week after an incident involving eight Chinese fishing vessels, Chinese and Filippino warships and coast guard vessels and a Chinese aircraft.

The standoff started when a Filippino warship stopped Chinese fishing vessels with an allegedly illegal haul of corals, giant clams and live sharks. But Chinese warships prevented the Filippino military from making any arrests. Despite talks between Chinese and Philippine diplomats held on Monday, the standoff has not been satisfactorily resolved yet.

Now, both the U.S. and the Philippine military claim that the current drill is in no way related to the standoff. The focus of the exercises will be on “improving security, counter-terrorism and humanitarian and disaster response,” Philippine military spokesman Major Emmanuel Garcia said. Also, both U.S. and Philippine officials stressed that China, which in the past has protested military exercises involving American forces near the contested region, was not an imaginary target in the drills.

In fact, the drill is an annual event planned a long time before. But there are some factors which prompt one to make a conclusion that this year’s exercise has a specific meaning and is – albeit indirectly – related to the Chinese–Philippine standoff.

It comes after the Barack Obama administration positively declared the South China Sea as an area of utmost importance for U.S. national interests. Already the U.S. has started allocation of its troops in adjacent regions. The first 200 marines have already arrived in Australia, and there are plans to deploy warships in Singapore.

The South China Sea is one of the world’s busiest sea lanes, and has lately become a stage for harsh territorial disputes between China on the one hand (which claims the maritime area of the South China Sea almost in its entirety) and other littoral countries, on the other. The bitterest disputes China has with Vietnam and the Philippines. The standoffs with these countries have become a common practice, and recently China issued a warning to other outside powers not to participate too actively in economic projects including oil drilling in the disputed zones. A factor adding to the existing tensions is that all China’s rivals are members of the ASEAN group and would prefer to deal with the territorial dispute in a multilateral format, while China prefers to deal with each country separately.

The U.S. policy of recent years has been that of engaging China’s rivals in the area. Against such a background, the important thing about the current maneuvers is that in the past the U.S.–Philippine exercises were held in other regions of the Philippines, namely in ones grappling with Muslim and communist insurgencies. The current drill is held close to the disputed maritime area and includes a mock retaking of an oil rig supposedly seized by terrorists.

The recent developments in the region, including the current drill, prompt many observers to note that tensions in the area are even higher than in the war-torn Middle East. There, the U.S. was drawn into two wars by the previous administration, and the present administration is trying to solve the problem of getting out of the calamity without losing face.

The strategic aim of containing China is becoming more and more a priority in U.S. foreign policy. At the moment, time is on China’s side – the U.S. will not dare risk any military standoff in the Asia Pacific until it is totally disentangled from the Middle East mess.

This does not exclude forming an alliance of littoral countries with their possible inclusion into an anti-Chinese front of countries like Japan, South Korea and (which is the U.S.’ golden dream) India. So, in future we may see more drills in the disputed waters conducted bilaterally and multilaterally.

Twenty years ago, Filippinos voted for a removal of all U.S. bases, including its biggest naval base in the Pacific at Subic Bay. It seems that U.S. strategists have come to the conclusion that it is time to return to a stage of national importance.

Boris Volkhonsky, senior research fellow, Russian Institute for Strategic Studies

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Michael
    April 17, 2012 at 11:43 pm

    Wolves always attack in pack!
    Should China and Russia be worried with recent U.S. led NATO increased military build up in the Pacific?
    The facts speak for themselves:
    Recent arrival of 200 marines in Darwin, Australian Northern Territory with lavish and constant military drills with South Korea and Japan, coupled with military aid to Indonesia and military maneuvers with The Philippines are “purely coincidental events”, right!?
    While North Korea represents double edged sword for both China and Russia it also means the First and Last “Line of DEFENSE”.
    At the same time pack of wolves made of South Korea, Japan, Indonesia and The Philippines represent the “FIRST LINE OF OFFENSE” for the U.S. led NATO!

  2. October 29, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    Don’t think, India is that kind of flexible, which USA thinks. Most of the Government promises from USA are not implemented especially in the case of Uranium for Electricity and promoting Pakistan Military Aid. The culprits for Terror attacks on Indian soil, are still travelling freely in Pakistan and meetings with Media. Being there is not a strong government in India, the flexibility of the government is a question mark.
    USA must stop their double standard, and must sincere with the largest democratic country, because we both believing and depending in peoples powers, not military powers.
    In the mean time, there are so many differences in between Middle east and pacific. The biggest example is Vietnam war. Any way there is some thing smelling in pacific. Japan and Philippines are reacting against Chinese shipping presence.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 498 other followers

%d bloggers like this: