Home > Uncategorized > U.S. Carrier Strike Groups Converge Off Iranian Coast

U.S. Carrier Strike Groups Converge Off Iranian Coast

Voice of Russia
March 13, 2012

‘The Enterprise’ heads east
Igor Siletsky

====

US aircraft carriers Carl Vinson and Abraham Lincoln are already stationed in the Arabian Sea, close to the Iranian coast. The Enterprise is due to join them on the 20th of March. The Enterprise is accompanied by three destroyers carrying cruise missiles and other ships. According to military analysts’ calculations, in total 500 missiles are aimed at Iran from the sea.

The Pentagon has declared that it developed a ‘super-weapon’ capable of hitting Iran, which is a powerful bomb weighing 14 tons and capable of busting bunkers located 65m underground.

====


USS Enterprise Strike Group


USS Carl Vinson Battle Group


USS Abraham Lincoln

Groups of US aircraft carriers are said to have been gathering along the Iranian coast. The largest US aircraft carrier, USS Enterprise, has left its base in Norfolk and is on its way to the Indian Ocean and further to the Iranian coast. Observers believe that in this way Washington is demonstrating the seriousness of its intentions, not so much to Tehran as to the countries that do not support anti-Iranian sanctions.

The West and Israel are convinced that Iran is actively developing nuclear weapons. Tehran’s declarations to the effect that its nuclear programme is peaceful in nature do not sound plausible to them. The economic pressure on the Iranian government keeps growing: UN, US and EU sanctions have been imposed on Iran. The latest step in this direction was the introduction of an embargo on Iranian oil imports. As we know, Tehran’s response was suspending oil deliveries to France and Germany.

Now, in the Western allies’ viewpoint, it is time to begin military pressure. US aircraft carriers Carl Vinson and Abraham Lincoln are already stationed in the Arabian Sea, close to the Iranian coast. The Enterprise is due to join them on the 20th of March. The Enterprise is accompanied by three destroyers carrying cruise missiles and other ships. According to military analysts’ calculations, in total 500 missiles are aimed at Iran from the sea.

The movements of US ships were forestalled by political declarations.

Washington is reassuring Israel with promises of support. The Pentagon has declared that it developed a ‘super-weapon’ capable of hitting Iran, which is a powerful bomb weighing 14 tons and capable of busting bunkers located 65m underground.

Earlier in March, the Israeli prime minister met with the US president. According to Western media, Barack Obama has managed to persuade Benjamin Netanyahu to refrain from attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities at least until September and maybe even longer because, owing to the presidential election which is due to take place in the US in November, it is the wrong time for the White House to get involved in new military ventures. Despite this, military forces are gathering around Iran. It is likely that the aim of this move is not only to try to put pressure on Tehran but also on the countries that have not joined the anti-Iranian sanctions, expert of the Russian Institute of Strategic Research Azhdar Kurtov believes.

“In all probability, the Americans are still hoping against hope that the economic sanctions will bear fruit. So far, India and Japan, major users of Iranian oil, have not joined the sanctions, so the appearance of a US aircraft carrier may be meant to show the waverers that the US means business.”

Meanwhile, Israel has stressed that attacks against Iran have been put off but not taken off the agenda. Tel Aviv is brushing aside the arguments that such a military operation would be dangerous for the entire Middle Eastern region, which is unfortunate because the consequences of a military attack against Iran are bound to spread far beyond the Middle Eastern frontiers, an expert at the Centre for International Security Pyotr Topychkanov says.

“Not only the Iranian nuclear infrastructure but also its military facilities would have to be attacked, in order to suppress the Iranian air defence. This means that it would amount to more than a single attack, it would be a full-blown military conflict. Iran would not be able to actively repel a US military action and would have to take alternative steps. As a result, the accusations put forward by radical US politicians that Iran is a sponsor of international terrorism could become a reality.”

There is an alternative to this scenario. Political scientist Stanislav Tarasov stresses that the main thing now is to end the international isolation of Iran. Tehran should be given the opportunity to continue working on the ‘peaceful atom’, provided its nuclear programme is fully transparent. Incidentally, the Iranian government has no objections to this policy and is prepared to meet with the group of six international intermediaries in Istanbul in March.

About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. rosemerry
    March 13, 2012 at 8:04 pm

    “The West and Israel are convinced that Iran is actively developing nuclear weapons.”
    This is NOT true, and the casual way Russia is discussing this coming war crime is unsettling. Russia and other UNSC members must bring some sanity to this Zionist fantasy of bombing a nonthreatening sovereign country ten times it size and expecting no retaliation. All these aircraft carriers and other threats are already war crimes.

    • richardrozoff
      March 14, 2012 at 2:17 pm

      You’re correct. The line should have read something to the effect that “The West and Israel claim that Iran” or, this would be a history-making piece of candor,”The West and Israel claim to believe that Iran…”

  2. March 30, 2012 at 10:43 pm

    “The West and Israel are convinced that Iran is actively developing nuclear weapons.”
    Well, the original article is in Russian. And it actually says something closer to “The West and Israel claim that Iran…” Translation metamorphosis, sorry about that
    Igor Siletsky

  3. Ted
    November 25, 2012 at 8:34 am

    Stop NATO? Ha. Instead, let’s focus on the dictator Putin – who is a murderer (he was head of KGB and his record rising to the top is well-known), who this past month (November) has effectively now made himself as powerful as Stalin. His goal is a massive arms build-up – for what possible purpose? NATO will never attack Russia – it is a defensive alliance. There is absolutely no security threat from NATO to the Russian Federation, and all the propaganda in the world won’t change that. Is the traditional enemy China a threat? Perhaps in a roundabout way, but China wants Taiwan and to expand their presence in the Pac-Rim, not Siberia. I am so sorry for the Russian people – that brief moment of freedom is now gone.

    • richardrozoff
      November 25, 2012 at 3:23 pm

      Boris Yeltsin was Washington’s man in Moscow and he handpicked Vladimir Putin as his successor.
      Putin has not been involved in killing anyone other than armed separatists in Chechnya and Dagestan – on Russian territory – and a small amount of Georgian troops after the invasion of South Ossetia in 2008.
      If you’re looking for murderers, and mass murderers at that, try looking in Washington, London and Paris.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: